Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: Morturday Previous entry: Ann Richards: He-Man Woman Hater

The Unbeatable Banzuke: Senate

Congress

I’ve been doing this long enough to remember back when filibustering was a tactic designed to obstruct the proper business of the Senate, a controversial Democratic practice that raised serious constitutional questions.

Luckily, we’ve evolved to the point where it’s everyone’s fault.

The Senate went home yesterday for the Fourth of July holiday to face voters, having failed repeatedly to address critical economic issues from skyrocketing gas prices to climate change to the nation’s housing crisis.

Leaders in both parties have vowed to tackle those problems. Yet the Senate has been unable to move forward even when there is broad agreement about what to do.

[...]

With each side using the Senate’s byzantine rules to gain advantage, work in the upper chamber, always balky, has ground to a halt.

What sort of maneuvers have each side used?

  • Republican senators have filibustered to keep a Medicare bill from going forward.
  • Harry Reid has prohibited 13 Republican amendments*...while Republican Senator John Ensign has thrown an amendment on the housing bill that’s crippled the bill’s passage.
  • The Republican minority leader has forced a 452-page bill to be read aloud, delaying a vote on the bill for days, even weeks.

As you can see, this is a heavily bipartisan problem that’s everyone’s fault.  No sense assigning blame to any one side over the other here.

*UPDATE: Reid’s blocking amendments like Ensign’s that are designed to purposefully stop legislation in its tracks.  In other words, he’s not holding up legislation, he’s trying to push it through.

 

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Jesse Taylor on 10:22 AM • (23) Comments

Actually all these bills are incredibly poor and I’m thankful that they didn’t pass.  If the Dems had better leadership with better bills then I may be upset.

Comment #1: JesusCrispy  on  06/28  at  11:22 AM

WHAT!!!! You mean our reps in Washington are wasting our hard earned tax dollars to accomplish nothing.

Comment #2: Jason  on  06/28  at  11:32 AM

Well, who was complaining about the filibusters three summers ago?

I don’t want to hear them complain anymore.  If our government is going to get anything done for us, we are going to have to vote the conservatives out of office.

Comment #3: Jovan1984  on  06/28  at  11:37 AM

I’ve said it before, I’ll say it again:  The right wing and left wing of our government are two wings on the same bird flying in the wrong direction.

Comment #4: Alab  on  06/28  at  11:38 AM

Voting Conservatives out of office isn’t going to solve anything, nor is voting out Liberals. We just need to find some honest politicians to vote fo….....oh wait, there aren’t any. DAMN!

Really though that’s the problem. We’re to worried about being Conservatives and Liberals to do anything constructive. We’d rather sit back and call each other names than accomplish anything. It’s easier to sit back and blame the other side.

Don’t get me wrong, I think we should vote for those that best represent our personal beliefs but I think those politicians are few and far between. Take our presidential candidates for example: Obama is the agent of change, how? Good question.  And McCain, well he’s to busy being a MAVERICK to focus on much else. Oh if we could only have JFK vs Reagan.

Comment #5: Jason  on  06/28  at  12:00 PM

Alab/Jason…it’s not “both sides”.  It’s uniformly Republican.

Comment #6: Jesse Taylor  on  06/28  at  02:42 PM

Jesse, don’t you mean “a controversial Democrat party practice”? Those dastards!

Comment #7: Ross Lincoln  on  06/28  at  02:44 PM

But also, what Jesse says re: “Both sides.”

Comment #8: Ross Lincoln  on  06/28  at  02:45 PM

How can it be “uniformly Republican” when “this is a heavily bipartisan problem that’s everyone’s fault”.

Comment #9: jed  on  06/28  at  02:46 PM

The same way I can say that Joey Lawrence is doing well for himself hosting Master of Dance despite the tears in his eyes every time a commercial comes on. 

Sarcasm.

Reid’s blocking Republican amendments that are designed to cripple legislation, just like the one I referenced.

Comment #10: Jesse Taylor  on  06/28  at  02:52 PM

You also wrote:

“we’ve evolved to the point where it’s everyone’s fault.”

and

“No sense assigning blame to any one side over the other here.”

but now you say it is “uniformly Republican”?

PS: I have no idea who Joey Lawrence is.

Comment #11: jed  on  06/28  at  02:58 PM

What the fuck is up with all the people who get an epic fail at sarcasm today? Nancy on the last post, and jed on this one. Did you guys sleep through the ‘90s, or something?

Comment #12: Dan, Grand High Emperor of Bananas Foster  on  06/28  at  03:09 PM

What sarcasm? And what do the 90s have to do with it?

Comment #13: jed  on  06/28  at  03:11 PM

Wait, are you saying that whole write-up was supposed to be sarcasm? I guess that makes anything Imus says sarcasm as well.

Comment #14: jed  on  06/28  at  03:15 PM

See, when I something is X, and then show a list of evidence that shows the opposite of X to be true, it can be inferred that one of those two things is likely an ironic commentary on the other.

Next time I’ll make sure to toss in some cursewords.

Comment #15: Jesse Taylor  on  06/28  at  03:31 PM

Thank you for proving my point for me, jed. If you don’t like being made fun of for not getting the joke, stop being a clueless git.

And since you brought it up, I’d like to supplement Jesse’s rather succinct explanation of why sarcasm works. What Don Imus does as a matter of habit is exactly the opposite of what Jesse has just explicated. Imus just says X without bothering to set up not-X. That is why what he does is not sarcasm.

Comment #16: Dan, Grand High Emperor of Bananas Foster  on  06/28  at  03:37 PM

Hey, reading the bills shouldn’t be a stalling tactic, but the standard.  There’s something wrong with a 432 page bill.

Comment #17: Aaron Denney  on  06/28  at  06:37 PM

I’m thinking that reading the bills would be a good thing.  Remember the Patriot Act?

Comment #18: Kyra  on  06/28  at  06:53 PM

Why make it out to be “fault”?

The filibuster serves the purpose of slowing down change - it’s an institutional mechanism wholly in the spirit of Madisonian democracy.

Currently, it’s all the GOP has to thwart the ill-conceived steamroller of leftist Democratic policy.

Thankfully, it looks so far that the GOP will maintain at least 41 seats in November, so expect more of this great historic tradition of protecting minority rights in a system of majority rule.

Comment #19: Americaneocon  on  06/28  at  07:06 PM

Why make it out to be “fault”?

The filibuster serves the purpose of slowing down change - it’s an institutional mechanism wholly in the spirit of Madisonian democracy.

Currently, it’s all the GOP has to thwart the ill-conceived steamroller of leftist Democratic policy.

They’re stopping bills 80+ members of the chamber agree with.

Comment #20: Jesse Taylor  on  06/28  at  07:35 PM

The filibuster serves the purpose of slowing down change - it’s an institutional mechanism wholly in the spirit of Madisonian democracy.

Funny how the Rethugs didn’t think so highly of the filibuster when they were in the majority.

Comment #21: cohumulone  on  06/28  at  08:30 PM

The Republicans broke the record for most filibusters in a session (which are two years) in one year. Pretty impressive. One of the problems is that newspapers don’t even use the term that much anymore (I’m surpised they mentioned it in this article), so people might not know how obstructionist the Republicans are being.

Comment #22: JohnL  on  06/28  at  08:31 PM

Has so much time gone by that everyone’s forgotten all the talk about the nuclear option? It’s only been three years, for fuck’s sake.

Comment #23: Auguste  on  06/29  at  02:37 AM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.