Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: Amazon Fail: A Follow-Up Previous entry: Follow-Up: National Car Rental Responds To Harassment And Threats Story Of Sarah Vestal

Unicorn Nuts…On Your Face

imageIt strikes me that Michelle Malkin’s problem isn’t that DHS is accurately describing rightwing extremist tactics, but that she’s obviously worried that those things apply to her.

(Here’s the actual report.)

This gets to the basic issue with the whole Tea Party movement.  It’s a group of fucknuts joining other groups of marginally related fucknuts to protest something or other, in a hugely fucknutty way.  The point of the Tea Party movement, besides the largest thrusting of testicles to America’s collective face since the Soviets launched Sputnik, is to protest…well, basically the entire functioning of the government with no alternative plan or goal whatsoever.  The stated purpose of the protests is “protest against out of control government spending”, which, while something, is also terribly and uselessly vague.  It’s easy to lump in the gun nut survivalists and the Paulies and any number of other wackos because a mission to do stuff (and things!) tends to welcome in anyone who has similar feelings about the top-level definition of “stuff”.  When you have a bunch of angry people welcoming a bunch of other angry people with no core principles or mission, it’s hard to get pissy when you all of a sudden find yourself standing beside Clem the White Supremacist Marksman with your “NO PORKULUS” sign.

Even teabagging advocates have no fucking idea what it is they’re endorsing, all they know is that Reagan fought against high taxes, and this feels like that, so it would be totally awesome if this created a similar result of massive deficit spending and a large tax hike that Reagan…

...Oh, fuck. 

Tea Partiers are hoping that if they mimic the energy of anti-war protests and the savvy of Obama’s new media operation, that at some point an actual movement will spawn.  Getting together a bunch of pissed off middle-aged white people with no clue about how the tax system works in public areas will generate a coherent agenda designed to combat the stimulus; if it gets enough media coverage, they will DOMINATE THE AGENDA.

It’s like taping a horn to a horse and waiting for it to alight on a magic cloud of stardust and pixies. 

 

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Jesse Taylor on 04:31 PM • (61) Comments

Protest!
?
Conservative Utopia!

Seriously, latch on to reality.  Nobody’s taxes have gone up.  You look stooopid in your faux Revolutionary garb.  They’re (we’re) laughing at you.  May a pit bull tea bag you (male) morons.

Comment #1: Magis  on  04/14  at  04:41 PM

Well, they have a Dick Armey supporting them.

Comment #2: rea  on  04/14  at  04:46 PM

It’s the Field of Dreams method of building a political movement: build the agenda first and the followers will come. Especially if your agenda is vague enough (“We don’t like taxes!”), it will naturally attract all sorts of people who will find that agenda of personal interest. Some of them might even be magical baseball players!

Comment #3: Keith  on  04/14  at  04:46 PM

Wait, they’re still going on about this Tea Party business? I stopped following that news thread weeks ago, when the “movement” was exposed as an astroturf campaign bankrolled by various wingnut welfare enterprises of the Koch family.

It looks like Idiot America is still alive and kicking (and whingeing like babies). What a bunch of suckers.

Comment #4: Gracchus.  on  04/14  at  04:59 PM

Remember - they surround us. 

.
.
.

In their fantasy world.

I think the buzzword for tomorrow’s teabagging is going to be FAIL.

Comment #5: jerry_101  on  04/14  at  05:19 PM

Even teabagging advocates have no fucking idea what it is they’re endorsing, all they know is that Reagan fought against high taxes, and this feels like that, so it would be totally awesome if this created a similar result of massive deficit spending and a large tax hike that Reagan…

...Oh, fuck.

Here’s the extreme irony…  they are protesting this massive Obama tax hike which doesn’t exist.  First off, Obama has yet to raise federal income taxes on ANYONE.  As of today, the Obama tax rate in 2009 is actually LOWER than the Bush tax rate was in 2008, since Obama gave a tax break to 95% of the country, and the top 5% still has the same rate today that they had last year.

When the Bush tax cuts do expire in December 2010, the top marginal rate for those making over $250K will increase by a whopping 4%, back to the level they were at during that oppresive Clinton regime when we didn’t have any economic prosperity whatsoever.

And even then… the Obama tax rate will STILL be lower than what the tax rate was during most of Ronald Reagan’s presidency.

Which obviously means that this Reagan person was obviously an imposter, a secret KGB communist dictator who infiltrated our country in 1980 with his Maoist ways.

But what makes it the funniest of all… if I had to guess, more than 90% of the fucknozzles attending these teabagging events will never see their federal income taxes raised under Obama, because I really don’t believe that most of these folks are in the $250K+ tax bracket.

So what exactly are they protesting?  Massive deficit spending?  Where have they been for the past 8 years?  Or for that matter, throughout the entire presidencies of any of our last 3 Republican presidents?

Comment #6: DTG in STL  on  04/14  at  05:20 PM

I, for one, welcome our hairy, wrinkly, and lumpy friends in the newly formed American Scrotulican Party!

Some balls are held for charity
And some for fancy dress
But when they’re held for pleasure
They’re the balls that I like best
My balls are always bouncing
To the <strike>left</strike> right and to the right
It’s my belief that my big balls
Should be <strike>held</strike> sucked every night

We’ve got big balls
We’ve got big balls
We’ve got big balls
Dirty big balls
He’s got big balls
She’s got big balls
(But we’ve got the biggest balls of them all)

— with apologies to Angus Young, Malcolm Young, and the late great Bon Scott…

Comment #7: MikeEss  on  04/14  at  05:22 PM

Malkin: “In Obama Land, there are no coincidences.”

Yeah, they are talking about her. Not that she’s going to blow someone up, but, someone hooked into the same rhetoric stream who just lost his job and then his family cuz he was kinda an asshole in the first place and now he can’t even bring home the bacon?

They also say that these certain recruiters will further radicalize such folks.

Comment #8: humanadverb  on  04/14  at  05:41 PM

Here’s the extreme irony… they are protesting this massive Obama tax hike which doesn’t exist.

Well, of course it exists!  He’s a Democrat, isn’t he?  Democrat = tax increase (even when, like under Clinton and Obama, taxes are lowered) while Republican = tax reduction (even when, like under Reagan and Bush I, taxes are raised).  So even if your taxes are going down mathematically, the increasing socialism means that in reality they’re going up!

/wingnut

Comment #9: Mnemosyne  on  04/14  at  06:10 PM

Well, hrumpf.  I paid my taxes today.  I didn’t enjoy it one little bit.  I don’t like taxes.  Mayhaps I shall shall put on some stupid clothing and miss a day’s work to go engage in <strike>scrotal</strike> Limbaugh worship.  That’ll make everything better!

Who knows, maybe the brown people will go back to…wherever.  Maybe I’ll get to move out of this basement.  Maybe a Conservative® will be made president-for-life.  Now if I close my eyes real hard….

Comment #10: Magis  on  04/14  at  06:13 PM

Oh my head.  The commenters over there make me want to vomit.

So full of hate against NOTHING.  How the hell is Obama destroying the country—and you cannot include anything that was fine and dandy when done by W’s gang of crooks?

The whining about DHS looking at the right wing, when THEY’RE THE ASSHOLES WHO BLOW UP ABORTION CENTERS AND FEDERAL BUILDINGS.  Code Pink never killed anyone.  Calling for War Crimes trials doesn’t kill anyone.

It most certainly is about race, since there’s NOTHING ELSE THERE.  Obama hasn’t raised taxes yet; he’s lowered them and is letting the Bush Tax Cuts run out in their own time.  Fucking Estate Tax even got passed up again.

Comment #11: Caren-Sun-blocking Creator of Animorphic Pancakes  on  04/14  at  06:23 PM

Oh, I left off the best part—>how this astroturf is showing how a majority of Americans are aware of how EVIL Obama is and how much they hate him and his antiAmerican policies.

Dudes, you are still the 29%ers.  Two-thirds of the country elected Obama and are happy with him as President.

You lost.  Your view of what America should be has been rejected.  Time to sit down and shut up.

Comment #12: Caren-Sun-blocking Creator of Animorphic Pancakes  on  04/14  at  06:25 PM

But what makes it the funniest of all… if I had to guess, more than 90% of the fucknozzles attending these teabagging events will never see their federal income taxes raised under Obama, because I really don’t believe that most of these folks are in the $250K+ tax bracket.

So what exactly are they protesting?

Scary negro muslim President.

They’d protest a law against putting your dick in a blender if it was pushed by a Democrat.  It’s not supposed to make sense.

And, to be fair, the Regan analogy isn’t honest.  Regan cut something like 30% off the top marginal tax rates.  He then raised the payroll tax while he was harvesting money from Social Security to pay for his drastic uptick in military spending.  For the rich, Regan was a godsend.  Likewise, Bush has been a freak’n miracle working, convincing people that a 15% tax rate on capital gains is in any way “fair”.  They worked their asses off to drag that tax rate down.  Telling the rich that it’s just a 4% hike (I mean, 4% of a billion dollar / year income is still $40 million - that’s a lot of money!) and it still doesn’t put them as high as they’d been under Regan isn’t comforting to folks who’ve been fighting hard as hell to drag the Corporate Tax Rate down another 10% and slash marginal tax rates even further.

It’s no mystery why they’re kicking and screaming like spoiled children.

Comment #13: Zifnab  on  04/14  at  06:49 PM

He then raised the payroll tax while he was harvesting money from Social Security to pay for his drastic uptick in military spending.

No.  While it’s true the government has been raiding the SS trust fund to disguise debt, that wasn’t the reason Reagan and congressional Democrats raised the payroll tax.  That was done to keep the Social Security trust from going bankrupt in the ‘80s.

Comment #14: keshmeshi  on  04/14  at  07:00 PM

Somebody asked to explain this whole tea party thing and exactly what the protesters were protesting.  Despite being pretty well informed politically and reading extensively on this subject, I was unable to form a coherent answer.  After stumbling around a bit, I said that what they were protesting is that Obama is president.  Upon reflection, I think that pretty well sums it up.

Comment #15: BadKitty  on  04/14  at  07:02 PM

My apologies to Zifnab.  You are faster with your typing skills.

So, yeah, what s/he said.

Comment #16: BadKitty  on  04/14  at  07:04 PM

They’d protest a law against putting your dick in a blender if it was pushed by a Democrat.

Let’s be fair - at this point, I’d protest a law forbidding them from putting their dicks in blenders too.

Comment #17: Phoenician in a time of Romans  on  04/14  at  07:05 PM

And, to be fair, the Reagan analogy isn’t honest.  Regan cut something like 30% off the top marginal tax rates.

Which is why I said during “most of Reagan’s presidency”.

The Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981 dropped the top marginal rate from 70% down to 50%.

The Tax Reform Act of 1986 then dropped the top marginal rate from 50% down to 28%.

So while yes, it’s true that Reagan cut taxes massively for the rich, and in the end, the top rate was lower than what it is currently or will be in 2010, for the first 6 years of Reagan’s presidency, the top rate was higher than what it will be when Obama lets the Bush tax cuts expire next year.  So my point was correct - that the rich will still be paying less in taxes under Obama than they did throughout most of Reagan’s presidency.

Comment #18: DTG in STL  on  04/14  at  07:14 PM

Telling the rich that it’s just a 4% hike (I mean, 4% of a billion dollar / year income is still $40 million - that’s a lot of money!) and it still doesn’t put them as high as they’d been under Regan isn’t comforting to folks who’ve been fighting hard as hell to drag the Corporate Tax Rate down another 10% and slash marginal tax rates even further.

It’s no mystery why they’re kicking and screaming like spoiled children.

The problem with that is… when you see the videos of the teabagging losers collectively whining tomorrow, you won’t be seeing people with billion dollar incomes who are gonna have to pay an extra $40MM in taxes in a few years.

You won’t even be seeing very many people with $250K incomes who are gonna be paying slightly higher taxes.

You’ll be seeing a lot of folks who are very likely beneficiaries of Obama’s tax policy - people who will literally be paying less in taxes under Obama than they did under Bush.

Which makes it all the more painfully clear what they’re really protesting about - Scary negro muslim President.

Comment #19: DTG in STL  on  04/14  at  07:22 PM

They have no program and no ideas and are trying to cover it up by screaming louder. They’re basically the Dangerous Brothers. Start watching at 2:00- this is how I see the Republican party. The desperation is frigging hilarious.

Comment #20: tb  on  04/14  at  07:57 PM

Here’s the extreme irony… they are protesting this massive Obama tax hike which doesn’t exist.  First off, Obama has yet to raise federal income taxes on ANYONE.  As of today, the Obama tax rate in 2009 is actually LOWER than the Bush tax rate was in 2008, since Obama gave a tax break to 95% of the country, and the top 5% still has the same rate today that they had last year.

Right on.  My wife and I both make 85K+ and our take home pay has increased noticeably since last month.  I’m sure most of these Teabaggers have seen their take home pay increase too, so what they fuck are they whining about?  They’re probably also upset that the American ship captain was rescued by the Navy SEALS, because it would have given them something else to bash Obama with had the captain been killed.

Comment #21: Tommykey  on  04/14  at  08:01 PM

Oh my fucking God, now Glenn Beck is openly petitioning states to consider secession:

You can’t convince me that the Founding Fathers wouldn’t allow you to secede.

The Constitution is not a suicide pact, and if a state says: ‘I don’t want to go there, because that’s suicide, they have a right to back out. They have a right — people have a right to not commit economic suicide…

...Texas says go to hell, Washington, which by the way has been said before. I believe it was Davey Crocket…it’s about time that somebody says that again.”

Seriously, this is a man who just needs to have a massive heart attack and die for the good of the country.  We can proudly thank this asshole when the next Timothy McVeigh decides to pursue infamy.

Comment #22: DTG in STL  on  04/14  at  08:43 PM

It’s like taping a horn to a horse and waiting for it to alight on a magic cloud of stardust and pixies.

That’ll happen, right?

.

.

The pixies and stardust, right?

.

Right??

:(

Comment #23: teac  on  04/14  at  08:53 PM

“You can’t convince me that the Founding Fathers wouldn’t allow you to secede.”

You know, I seem to remember we fought a war over that question.  What was it called again?

Comment #24: Mnemosyne  on  04/14  at  08:55 PM

did we not fight a war over that very issue?

States cannot secede.  We probably should have let the South go, but we didn’t: we kicked their asses and burned their towns to the ground.

We can do it again.  Just b/c liberals/progressives think we should talk about things first, doesn’t mean we won’t kill you if not given any other option.

Comment #25: Caren-Sun-blocking Creator of Animorphic Pancakes  on  04/14  at  08:58 PM

I really have no patience with the Teabaggers. I want to ask each and every one of them what they are protesting. Specifically, what do you have in common with those who dumped the tea into Boston Harbor? Do you live in DC or another US territory where you must pay taxes but get no senators with votes, just a shadow senator? Do you get a delegate to Congress who can’t cast a vote? I didn’t think so. You do not have taxation without representation. Are you queer? Do you have to pay extra taxes on your partner’s health insurance if you can get it at all? Are your surgical and medical needs not covered because of your status crime of being transsexual? No? Bzzt. You lose. Go home and take your damn tea with you so someone working for minimum wage doesn’t have to pick up your litter.

Comment #26: one jewish dyke  on  04/14  at  08:59 PM

You can’t convince me that the Founding Fathers wouldn’t allow you to secede.

Didn’t Jefferson support the right to secession?  Anyway, Jefferson != all the Founding Fathers.  It also figures that Beck can’t cite a specific source in the Constitution allowing for secession.  If the right to secede mattered so much to the Framers, you’d think they’d set up a specific nonviolent means of doing so, like 67 percent of the state legislature voting for it = you get to secede!

Comment #27: keshmeshi  on  04/14  at  09:09 PM

Malkin: “In Obama Land, there are no coincidences.”

That’s because Blackazoid is in total control of the Free World baby ... and don’t you forget it!

Comment #28: Ms Kate  on  04/14  at  09:09 PM

I wonder if these same people are the target of an ad I heard this morning.  In the radio ad, the interviewer is snidely asking questions of a man who just received the tiniest tax refund in history ... $0.01 ... asking him why he thinks it is cause to celebrate at (a fast food joint).

And here I’m thinking: $0.01 refund?  That ... is ... so ... WIN!  I mean, hey ... the government didn’t hold on to more than a penny more than you really owed in taxes for much of the year, and you didn’t owe anything or any penalties either!  That would be excellent!  He got to use his money all year and the government didn’t.

See what I mean?

Comment #29: Ms Kate  on  04/14  at  09:13 PM

Thanks for explaining it so succinctly.

I been reading about it on different blogs - thinking…... so a bunch of Americans are going to buy heaps of tea bags and run down and throw them in the nearest bit of water.

All I could think was what a waste of tea!
Who was going to clean up the mess ?
Won’t they all feel a bit silly?

Comment #30: tricky  on  04/14  at  09:20 PM

keshmeshi:

nuh-uh on the trust fund going bankrupt in the 80s. In the 80s they could see pretty clearly that the trust fund would go belly up when boomers started to retire, so they increased the rates to put away a big stash that would cover boomer retirement. That’s the money that Bush and Cheney were effectively raiding. (Because the “surplus” collections were on budget when they really should have been a completely separate account.) Without the excess social security contributions, deficits through the Bush administration (and Clinton’s) would have looked rather worse.

Fundamental lesson: don’t let republicans have the keys to the car or the liquor cabinet.

Comment #31: paul  on  04/14  at  09:20 PM

“We can do it again.  Just b/c liberals/progressives think we should talk about things first, doesn’t mean we won’t kill you if not given any other option.”


Wait, wait, WAIT!  I just moved to Northern Va for work two years ago and I kind of like it here, even if the state capital is crazy, and we went blue in the last election, and I’m really a New Yorker, and


please don’t kill me.

Comment #32: Heo Cwaeth  on  04/14  at  10:17 PM

You can’t convince me that the Founding Fathers wouldn’t allow you to secede.

Ah, the old “All the Founders were Jeffersonian” trope.

Maybe Jefferson believed secession was legal, but Hamilton and Washington sure as shit didn’t. Their side won out in a big-ass war some eighty odd years later as we all know.

Comment #33: Ben D.  on  04/14  at  10:17 PM

Oh, and Glenn?

Do you remember what happened when a bunch of wingnuts in western Pennsylvania tried to protest taxation with representation? Washington rode out at the head of the army with his Secretary of the Treasury to enforce the law of the land.

Comment #34: Ben D.  on  04/14  at  10:20 PM

I really want to go to the one by me tomorrow, with a big “Save The Rich” sign or even banner.  But I just know that the usual suspects, like Gathering of Eagles are going to be at the one near me, and I am so sick of those animals after years of them following us around at peace demonstrations.  “Do you want to suck my dick?”  “What kind of underwear are you wearing?”  “I should shoot you in the face”.  I think I’m too tired of it right now.

Comment #35: Lady Vader  on  04/14  at  10:22 PM

Apparantly General Beck isn’t a very good historian.

He was right when he said that Davey Crockett participated in the fight for Texas’ secession.

Problem is, he was wrong about which country Texas was seceding from in Crockett’s day… Mexico.

Crockett died in 1836 at the Battle of the Alamo in the Texas Revolution - a quarter century before the Southern states’ secession that led to the Civil War.

Comment #36: DTG in STL  on  04/14  at  10:23 PM

I really want to go to the one by me tomorrow, with a big “Save The Rich” sign or even banner.  But I just know that the usual suspects, like Gathering of Eagles are going to be at the one near me, and I am so sick of those animals after years of them following us around at peace demonstrations.  “Do you want to suck my dick?” “What kind of underwear are you wearing?” “I should shoot you in the face”.  I think I’m too tired of it right now.

I know some folks here who made a huge sign and are going to attach it to the side of a van that reads: “Shouldn’t you people be working?  How can you protest taxes when you’re obviously not paying any?  Get a job, losers!!!”

They also plan to throw a shitload of acorns into the crowd as they drive by the protest site.

Comment #37: DTG in STL  on  04/14  at  10:31 PM

Oh I love that DTG!  I wish I could watch it.  That’s excellent!

Comment #38: Lady Vader  on  04/14  at  10:48 PM

You can’t convince me that the Founding Fathers wouldn’t allow you to secede.

Beck sounds like one of those Christian fundamentalists who says that you can’t convince him that the Earth is over 4 billion years old because it goes against the Bible.

Comment #39: Tommykey  on  04/15  at  12:07 AM

It looks like Texas is ready to take him up on this.

Comment #40: tb  on  04/15  at  12:21 AM

Aaaaaaannnnnnd…..

It appears that Rick Perry, Governor of Texas, has taken up Glenn Beck’s proposal and just declared that the state of Texas is a sovereign entity.

Seriously.

I believe the federal government has become oppressive. It’s become oppressive in its size, its intrusion in the lives of its citizens, and its interference with the affaris of our state.

Texans need to ask themselves a question. Do they side with those in Washington who are pursuing this unprecendented expansion of power, or do they believe in individual rights and responsibilities laid down in our foundational documents.

Where’re you gonna’ stand? With an ever-growing Washington bureaucracy, or are you going to stand with the people of this state who understand the importance of state’s rights.

Texans need to stand up. They need to be heard, because the state of affairs that we find ourselves in cannot continue indefinitely…

...We think it’s time to draw the line in the sand and tell Washington that no longer are we going to accept their oppressive hand in the state of Texas. That’s what this press conference, that’s what these Texans are standing up for. There is a point in time where you stand up and say enough is enough, and I think Americans, and Texans especially have reached that point.

Umm… did that lunatic just declare that the State of Texas will no longer subject itself to the authority of the Unites States of America?

Treason?

Anyone?

Comment #41: DTG in STL  on  04/15  at  12:27 AM

Umm… did that lunatic just declare that the State of Texas will no longer subject itself to the authority of the Unites States of America?

Because the best possible time to declare your independence from the federal government is when drug lords and the Mexican government are battling it out on the other side of the river from you.

Comment #42: Mnemosyne  on  04/15  at  01:10 AM

They’d protest a law against putting your dick in a blender if it was pushed by a Democrat.

They’ll pry my blender from my cold, dead dick.

Comment #43: Captain Bathrobe  on  04/15  at  02:38 AM

the Texas resolution is stating that the 10th amendment guarantees that anything that is not officially granted as a power to the federal government is either a State power or a People power; they then go on to state that the federal government has for some unspecified number of past years been in violation of the 10th amendment, that it is continuing not only the past violations but adding more, and that Texas therefor no longer has to pay any attention to anything the government says that is not covered by the 10th amendment.

the thing is… it *seems* as if the drafters of this resolution are stopping at the 10th amendment. maybe i’m just being paranoid, but i am *REALLY* getting the impression that anything after the 10th amendment is considered to not be “legal” here.

and… um… yeah. it looks like secession.

Amanda, i have couch space (here in Ohio) if you need it smile

Comment #44: denelian  on  04/15  at  03:35 AM

Hee hee… looks like their Wikipedia page has been vandalized:

The Tea Party protests are a series of nationally coordinated festivals sponsored by the Fox News Channel in which deranged conservative wingnuts convene to collectively dip their testicles into each other’s faces.

I’m sure it will probably be cleaned up by tomorrow, but it looks like someone’s fucking with them…

Comment #45: DTG in STL  on  04/15  at  04:25 AM

I’m waiting for Wikipedia to post estimate of numbers.  I want to add a piece contrasting that to teh Feb 15 2003 anti-War protests.  I somehow suspect it will be smaller…

Comment #46: Phoenician in a time of Romans  on  04/15  at  05:20 AM

Here’s the extreme irony… they are protesting this massive Obama tax hike which doesn’t exist.  First off, Obama has yet to raise federal income taxes on ANYONE.  As of today, the Obama tax rate in 2009 is actually LOWER than the Bush tax rate was in 2008, since Obama gave a tax break to 95% of the country, and the top 5% still has the same rate today that they had last year.

But chocolate rations are UP! Big Brother said so!

Comment #47: Dunc  on  04/15  at  06:34 AM

TX resolution here:

http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/tlodocs/81R/billtext/html/HC00050I.htm

denelian, my read is that it doesn’t attempt to void US Constitution amendments after the 10th, but asserts TX legislative supremacy over the US Congress.  See this part:

</i>RESOLVED, That all compulsory federal legislation that directs states to comply under threat of civil or criminal penalties or sanctions or that requires states to pass legislation or lose federal funding be prohibited or repealed;</i>

So, this could easily include basically any federal mandate that requires action by state governments, including regulation of the environment, education, labor rights, voting rights, civil rights, transportation, finance, you name it.

How long would the Voting Rights Act remain law in TX?  How long would TX retain any social welfare programs?  How long before it reinstates prayer in schools?  How long would Texans continue to pay federal taxes?

Even if it does retain recognition of the US Constitution as supreme law, it looks to me like it asserts the right of the states to basically nullify federal law.  The nullification debate of the early 19th century was the precursor to secession.

Of course, I’m pretty sure Congress is under no obligation to recognize the resolution even if it’s passed, or comply with its demands, despite the resolution’s direction to the TX delegation to enter it into the Congressional Record.  It’s just the TX legislature’s expression of an opinion, as far as I can tell.

It’s nucking futs, any way you look at it.

Didn’t someone here recently predict that the next real target of the current right wouldn’t be Roe v Wade, but Marbury v Madison?

I am looking forward to another secession thread, those are always fun.

Comment #48: Chocolate Covered Cotton  on  04/15  at  06:52 AM

I am looking forward to another secession thread, those are always fun.
RobW, Sushi No Gakusei on 04/15 at 01:52 AM

“It’s all fun and games until someone loses an eye.”
—Xander “One-Eye” Harris, Buffy the Vampire Slayer.

Comment #49: Mark Foxwell  on  04/15  at  08:29 AM

I don’t know much about the guy (other than the fact that he has a reputation as a kooky oddball), but apparantly Kinky Friedman is prepping for another run for governor of Texas... as a Democrat.

Richard “Kinky” Friedman, the iconoclastic musician who won 12 percent of the vote as an independent candidate for the Texas governorship in 2006, is laying the groundwork to run for the governorship next year as a Democratic candidate.

In a letter on his Web site that was addressed to “fellow Texans,” Friedman said he could stitch together a winning coalition of Democratic and independent voters to wrest from Republican control an office that a Democrat last won in 1990.

“I intend to run a serious campaign, one that grows the party,” Friedman said. “I intend to visit and listen to the voices of neglected communities, small towns, suburbs, and rural areas, often where Democrats have lately feared to tread.”

A few questions for the Texans…

1) Where does Kinky stand on the social issues?  I doubt he’s an ultra progressive, but is he at least more progressive than Perry or Hutchinson?

2) Could he actually win as a Democrat against either Perry or Hutchinson?

Comment #50: DTG in STL  on  04/15  at  09:05 AM

All the feds would have to do if Perry went through with that threat is cut off Texas’s highway and education funds. He would either have to massively raise taxes or make a meek apology to the feds.

Comment #51: Ben D.  on  04/15  at  11:15 AM

DTG—

He is pro-choice and openly supports gay marriage, according to wikipedia. And anti-death penalty.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinky_Friedman#Politics

Comment #52: Ben D.  on  04/15  at  11:17 AM

All the feds would have to do if Perry went through with that threat is cut off Texas’s highway and education funds. He would either have to massively raise taxes or make a meek apology to the feds.

Ah, but I think that’s Perry’s argument:  the feds have to give him money but they’re not allowed to tell him what to do with it.  So you’d see a hissy fit to end all hissy fits when he starts sputtering that they’re keeping “his state’s” money by not giving them federal money.

Comment #53: Mnemosyne  on  04/15  at  11:59 AM

Ah, but I think that’s Perry’s argument:  the feds have to give him money but they’re not allowed to tell him what to do with it.

So he’s basically becoming an AIG executive?

Comment #54: Ben D.  on  04/15  at  12:16 PM

...We think it’s time to draw the line in the sand and tell Washington that no longer are we going to accept their oppressive hand in the state of Texas.

Time to stop sending all that oppresive federal funding to Texa$$ as well.

Comment #55: cynickal  on  04/15  at  01:06 PM

So I walked by the Chicago tea party on my lunch break, got there about 12:45 PM. Federal Plaza next to the Kluczynski Federal bldg.. A decent crowd had gathered in the space near the Calder sculpture. It looked like yer basic protest. About 300 or 400. Someone was speaking on a loudspeaker but I couldn’t tell who.

Signs:
“Freedom not Socialism”
“Scrap the Code”
“Obama has spent his change”
“Resign”
People had yellow “Don’t Tread On Me” buttons with the snake picture, or were wearing tea bags.

There were a few cop cars.

One guy was there who I’d seen at antiwar demonstrations. He had his bike with the peace sign on it. Some kids in “V” masks were confusing the message by protesting Scientology’s tax breaks.

So, not huge but not tiny either.

Comment #56: atheist  on  04/15  at  03:25 PM

Kinky’s doomed. He’s got too much offensive stuff in his closet for mainstream consumption, being that part of his schtick is to shock. Hutchison may well defeat Perry, but she’s not exactly the shining star of progressive thought. Still, I’m kinda thinking she may be the best choice, if those are my choices. The Dems…I dare not hope. Still, these are extraordinary times.

Comment #57: the matthew show  on  04/15  at  03:52 PM

So he’s basically becoming an AIG executive?

Sounds like a teenager - “stop telling me what to do and give me money and get out of my life!”

Comment #58: Ms Kate  on  04/15  at  04:44 PM

Well, Governor Perry didn’t ask to be born!

Comment #59: Chocolate Covered Cotton  on  04/15  at  09:26 PM

RobW…
like i said, it just *feels* like that. a vibe, not a specific.

that said… oh, yeah, if they (Texas dumbass government) try this, i predict the first things that go are social programs and etc.

as you say, nucking futs.

i *HOPE* Congress doesn’t just “ignore” this because they can - i hope they DO SOMETHING about it. its a bad precedent… and while it would be nice to *NOT* share a country with wingnuts, i am sure that most people in Texas are NOT wingnuts.

Comment #60: denelian  on  04/16  at  03:17 AM

Dude, I am laughing so hard at this post that PhysioCat just woke up and gave me a look of deep hatred!

Comment #61: PhysioProf  on  04/19  at  04:53 PM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.