Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: Voters Feel Stuff About Things Previous entry: Just A Thought On Focus On The Family’s Totally Mainstream Positions

Untimely Bamboo Reviews: Jennifer’s Body

Warning: spoilers.

I finally got around to watching this movie over the weekend, after watching it basically sink at the box office and wondering if that meant that Diablo Cody had failed to write in a genre that begs for her goofy willingness to overwrite any script or any character.  Well, I can assure you that the box office doesn’t reflect what’s in this movie.  It’s really a fun, inventive spin on the trashy horror flick.  Now, if you’re not generally a fan of horror films, you’re probably not going to like this movie.  It does flout some horror movie conventions, but probably not the ones that horror movie haters would need done away with in order to see it.  It’s still filled with gore and over-the-top evil and tasteless jokes.  But if you were staying away because you didn’t want to watch Megan Fox suck as an actress, rest assured that she is not the one who has to carry this movie.  That honor belongs to Amanda Seyfried, who really can act, and who plays Jennifer’s best friend, who has the anvilicious name Needy. If you were worried that the much-ballyhooed girls kissing scene was nothing but exploitation, I can actually say that it works really well with the plot and feels natural for the characters. 

The question on a lot of minds is, “Did Diablo Cody write a feminist horror film?”  And the answer is, “Depends.”  There’s no overt political agenda, but there is exploration of parts of young women’s lives that are usually ignored in horror movies to advance the “OMG SEXY GIRLS DIE” plots.  It even tries, in a light-handed way, to subvert the horror movie trope where sexually active women get killed—-we see a teenager lose her virginity, and she doesn’t end up dead, but ends up the hero.  So, the Final Girl who survives in most horror movies is clearly marked as virginal, and in this movie, she’s not only not virginal, but her attachment to a sexual relationship is what moves her to act against the monster.  That’s a straightforward subversion of the trope, but arguably, Jennifer’s character isn’t subversive at all—-she becomes a demon because she wasn’t a virgin when she is kidnapped and used as a sacrifice in a Satanic ritual, and she works by seducing her victims.  The movie even hits you over the head with this stereotype, flashing the word “succubus” on the screen during the inevitable research period.  That’s a straight up vagina monster, right there—-the nightmare of the sexually desiring woman turned monster.

And yet, Cody actually does take a stab at subverting the type.  One, she gives Jennifer a real relationship to her friend Needy, making her seem a little more human, even if most of what you get from her is her post-human phase.  She uses Needy and treats her like shit, but they really do feel for each other in ways that are hard for outsiders to understand.  Because of this, you really start to feel bad that the real Jennifer is gone and replaced by a demon.  In that anvilicious horror movie way, they make the underlying theme of watching a beloved friend drift away and become someone you don’t know work onscreen.  And so the actions Needy takes to kill demon Jennifer are muddled and loving towards the long-gone Jennifer, and the real bad guys in the movie end up being the rock band that sacrificed Jennifer to Satan in order to make it as a rock band. 

Mostly, I just dug the character played by Seyfried, who is cast perfectly.  The blood spattering and weird sexual stuff that characterizes a horror movie is attention-grabbing, and you don’t realize how quietly this character of the nerdy wallflower comes into her own as a grown woman with confidence until the end of the movie.  And that’s probably the biggest subversion—-nerdy girls coming into their own is usually a story about how they learned to be attractive to guys, as if that’s the only power a woman can have.  But from the beginning, Needy has a boyfriend and isn’t particularly worried about that kind of power.  The power she gains is to act in the world, to learn to trust her own instincts and not let her friend Jennifer keep telling her what to do and how to be.  But lest you think all that girl power stuff is going to get sentimental, it comes at you on a sea of blood and gore and Cody-style wisecracks.  And a story about a woman learning to act with confidence probably suits Cody’s style more than Juno’s story, which is about a girl learning to lower the emotional walls in a rather dramatic fashion, by having a baby.

 

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Amanda Marcotte on 07:56 PM • (22) Comments

So then why did everyone say it sucked?  Was this just Megan Fox backlash - the result of a Transformers 2 hate-on?  Was it just too cliche?  Or are the reviews so totally misplaced that it can just be written off as being hated on by haters?

I love myself a good horror flick, so I was curious how this one would turn out.  But when it tanked, I wrote it off.  Does it really not suck, or is it just a variation on a theme that happens to be more girl-powery than most?

Comment #1: Zifnab  on  02/08  at  08:52 PM

Backlash against Megan Fox and Diablo Cody is my guess.  100% of super popular female performers get it.

Comment #2: Amanda Marcotte  on  02/08  at  09:16 PM

Scott Tobias @ the Onion AV Club, which is usually my go-to site for reliable movie opinions, was 90% Diablo Cody hate. He didn’t like “Whip It” at all either.

Comment #3: Geocrackr  on  02/08  at  09:51 PM

I enjoyed it a great deal, but that was mostly because I drug my not-at-all-a-feminist friend to watch it with me as revenge for the million and one bro-mance films he took me to (suck it).

Also, I don’t think Needy lost her virginity in that scene.  Cody has said in interviews that she wanted it to be clear that Needy was NOT a virgin, so she included the sex scene, but wanted the implication to be that Needy had had sex with boyfriend before.

Comment #4: Antigone  on  02/08  at  10:51 PM

Does it really not suck, or is it just a variation on a theme that happens to be more girl-powery than most?

Variation on a theme is, for me, sort of the point of horror movies, which is why I like the Nightmare on Elm Street movies, so I liked Jennifer’s Body.  I also watched it on a plane, and low expectations never hurt.

Comment #5: Tree  on  02/08  at  10:52 PM

Mostly, I just dug the character played by Seyfried, who is cast perfectly.

If you say so, although the idea of casting that heartbreakingly lovely girl as a plain-Jane nerd left me a little puzzled. (Although it probably shouldn’t, since it’s a Hollywood convention: A plain woman is a beautiful woman with glasses.)

Comment #6: Bitter Scribe  on  02/09  at  12:11 AM

She’s pretty, but in an offbeat, relatable way.

Comment #7: Amanda Marcotte  on  02/09  at  12:34 AM

I haven’t watched the movie (fucking Signs gave me nightmares for a week) but does Jennifer get sacrificed because she purposefully misrepresents herself as a virgin? Or do they just assume she is? Is she intending to be a virgin sacrifice or does she just not speak up quickly enough, sort of thing? ‘Cause it sounds like, depending how it’s played, it could be more about men’s *expectations* about women’s sexualities creating monsters rather than women sexualities themselves creating monsters.

Like, maybe if dudes would murder girls less and obsess about virginity less they wouldn’t have to worry about getting succubus-ed to death later? Does Jennifer kill the guys who killed her, at all? ‘Cause then dying as a non-virgin at least allowed her to avenge herself in ways that dying as a virgin would not…

Comment #8: Bagelsan  on  02/09  at  12:39 AM

Ok, gotta see the movie now.

Comment #9: Prodigal  on  02/09  at  12:46 AM

Bagelsan @8 -

Jennifer purposely misrepresents herself as a virgin, because the lead singer of Low Shoulder (the satanic rock band), to whom she is attracted, hints that he wants her to be.  We know that - in her own words - she’s “not even a backdoor virgin” (the boy responsible for this change in status apparently didn’t do a very good job; there’s a joke about sitting on a bag of frozen peas), but the band just has a one-night gig in town. 

Later, when they take her away to be sacrificed, she’s too deeply in shock to protest (the concert venue burned down, killing several people), and perhaps even a little enchanted.  By the time she snaps out of it, they’re too busy singing “Jenny (867-5309)” and stabbing her to listen. 

Jenny doesn’t get to kill them herself.  The succubus that was summoned into her body as a result of their miscast ritual has no reason to bear them any ill will.  However, in the climactic battle, she bites her friend Needy, who is then infected with the demon’s power.  Needy (also not a virgin) goes on to slaughter Low Shoulder during the closing credits. 

Long story short, this:

Like, maybe if dudes would murder girls less and obsess about virginity less they wouldn’t have to worry about getting succubus-ed to death later?

...is pretty well supported by the movie.

Comment #10: Seraph  on  02/09  at  02:43 AM

Basically, all Roger Ebert had to say about it to get me to want to see it was this:

“This isn’t your assembly-line teen horror thriller. The portraits of Jennifer and Needy are a little too knowing, the dialogue is a little too off-center, the developments are a little too quirky. After you’ve seen enough teen thrillers, you begin to appreciate these distinctions. Let’s put it this way: I’d rather see “Jennifer’s Body” again than “Twilight.”

And now that you’ve vetted it for me, I’m in!  Ordered on borders.com. smile

Comment #11: Lisa KS  on  02/09  at  03:47 AM

Yeah, no, it was pretty god awful and I’m really beginning to suspect that Diablo Cody doesn’t have a genuine feminist movie in her.

For everyone who thought this was good, please for Bob’s sake do yourselves a favor and track down the good and genuinely subversive and feminist version of this movie (the phenomenal feminist horror movie Ginger Snaps, hell, the whole series if you can swing it but number one was the dominator).

Maybe I couldn’t help comparing it, maybe I couldn’t bypass the regressive abstinence only subtext or Megan Fox’s hideous lack of talent as an actress, but this movie was not anywhere in the same league as genuine feminist horror movies like Rosemary’s Baby, Stepford Wives, or the aforementioned Ginger Snaps.

Seriously, everyone, go see Ginger Snaps, every scrap you’re clinging to in this movie was done in that one better and more genuinely satisfying including nerdy girl heroine coming into her own.

Comment #12: Cerberus  on  02/09  at  09:03 AM

Actually, go see Teeth. It completely subverts the horror flick tropes about virginity and the deep seated fears and myths that women have about their own sexuality, albeit in a completely stupid, silly way.

Comment #13: Mighty Ponygirl  on  02/09  at  10:27 AM

I didn’t think Ginger Snaps was particularly feminist. It’s mostly a parable about puberty and teenage alienation. I guess the fact that they cast girls instead of boys makes it a tad subversive, however it also leads to the unfortunate (unfeminist) implications that lycanthropy is a stand-in for menstruation (grr, PMS makes me a raging beast once a month!).

Comment #14: BlackBloc  on  02/09  at  11:53 AM

I would really like to see this, but I hate horror.  Perhaps I shall watch it with a blanket over my head, as I did Dead Alive.

Deadgirl sounded very good too…and nightmare inducing.  And Teeth…
I should see if my housemate will watch them with me, cuz my husband would probably hate them.

Comment #15: lonespark  on  02/09  at  02:58 PM

wow, could this movie possibly be more pathetically derivative? at least, that’s how it comes off by your review. i’ve only seen a couple of ads for it (it died a quick death in theatres), and wasn’t compelled to run out and see it, because i already had, many times over.

actually, the first time i saw this movie was when i read, then saw, both frankenstein & dracula (the original sound versions, not the multitudinous remakes); both cast the “monsters” as sympathetic characters, doomed by forces they had no control over.

shakespeare supposedly opined that there were only 8 original plots, and the greeks had invented them all. everthing thing afterwards is derivative.

Comment #16: cpinva  on  02/09  at  03:13 PM

I agree with Cerberus, I’m a horror movie fan and this just didn’t do anything for me. I wasn’t scared (didn’t even jump) and I think I laughed once. I was happy I rented it instead of wasting my time going to the theater. The acting was okay but I just couldn’t buy the characters or the situations they were in, (your best friend was kidnapped, and comes into your house bloody spewing black bile and you tell… no one? okaaay). And then trying to make Needy and Jennifer mentally connected (when Jennifer was kissing Needy’s boyfriend Needy “sensed” it, to which I rolled my eyes). And outside of the fact that Jennifer needed to use Needy to make her feel better I didn’t buy that they’d be “best” friends. And the subplot about the band never really went anywhere until the very end and then that was tossed aside for the end credits.

Comment #17: UltraMagnus  on  02/09  at  03:20 PM

shakespeare supposedly opined that there were only 8 original plots, and the greeks had invented them all. everthing thing afterwards is derivative.

In that context, criticising a movie for being derivative seems awfully harsh.

Comment #18: Brian  on  02/09  at  04:32 PM

lonespark-
Teeth is not very scary. just a few detached penis grossout scenes to worry about. other than that it was pretty low key.

Comment #19: Panda Dog  on  02/09  at  10:45 PM

In that context, criticising a movie for being derivative seems awfully harsh.

Cpinva watched those 8 original movies and never watched another thing for the rest of hir life. It was only right. :D

Comment #20: Bagelsan  on  02/10  at  05:50 AM

Is it filled with “quirky cute” characters and dialogue, like in Juno and United States of Tara? If so, then I’ll pass.

Comment #21: pablo  on  02/10  at  07:12 PM

I saw this movie originally because it came out on my birthday, and of course I freaking love Diablo Cody. I didn’t love it at the time—actually I walked out of the theatre. (But that was mainly because I had just come down with a raging case of pinkeye, which would have killed my enjoyment of pretty much anything.)

I’d have ADORED this movie if Needy’s slaughter of the rock band had been shown in full. I felt like at least some of the payoff was missing.

Also, the soundtrack? Freaking RULES. I couldn’t even pick a favorite track though right now I’ve got “Toxic Valentine” by All Time Low stuck in my head.

Comment #22: Chai_Latte  on  02/10  at  09:46 PM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.