Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: $150,000 gulf between Palin fans and the rest of us Previous entry: New video!

Vote, You Catty Whores!  Vote!

imageThat, at least, seems to be the GOP’s take towards women and Sarah Palin.

It seems counterproductive to approach all women as if they’re either going to vote their ovaries, or their cold, hateful hearts, but there you have it.  Rick Davis and James Dobson explain “liberal feminist” opposition to Sarah Palin, which appears to explain the psychology of women on the same level a group of thirteen year old boys explain sex to each other - poorly and with a desperate fervor that maybe one day they’ll get to touch a real something or other.

The aftermath of this election may be transformative in more ways than one.  Since the era of Reagan, conservatives have taken continual comfort in the idea that they can play on any number of cultural touchpoints using codewords from “states’ rights” to “Dred Scott” to “yes, I’m fully heterosexual” without having to actually touch on the actual issues at hand - race, abortion, the sweet, shuddering love half the GOP caucus must deny - and as such, rile up a bigoted base while still playing to a middle uneasy with the overt rabble-rousing necessary to get a conservative base out to vote.

With Obama, the GOP’s been playing a very touchy game - Obama is, in so many ways, the embodiment of the GOP nightmare.  He’s an educated, somewhat liberal black man who’s managed to succeed in life despite having contacts with the unsavory elements among us like communities and other black people.  He’s got a weird background, a strange name, a close enough relationship to the Most Evil Religion On Earth for use in e-mail forwards, and people actually like him.  One of the ways the conservative movement have chosen to respond is by assailing the people who support Obama, and make them as much terrorists and enemies as the man himself.

With regards to women (who dislike Palin immensely), the id of anti-woman bigotry is coming out and will continue to blossom.  They gave you a set of ovaries and a pretty face to smile for, and you’re so crazy and irrational that you can’t accept the gift of a token all gift-wrapped and pretty for you.  At the end of this, what we’ll find is a GOP that’s motivated by an even grander sense of resentment and entitlement than the one we have now, and isn’t afraid to say so.  The blacks and the women and the Jews and the Hispanics and every other identifiable and blameworthy group will be called out and held responsible for the awful, terrible things that they refused to prevent when they were given the chance to vote for the lackluster white guy and the pretty white lady.

Prepare, all ye non-white males.  (And ye white males who are otherwise occupied with not being resentful assholes.)

 

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Jesse Taylor on 04:26 PM • (29) Comments

*They* go out of their way to offend women, to offend ethnic, and racial, and sexual minorities, to offend intelligent people, to offend educated people, to offend just about every human being in this country and in others, and then they’re surprised that we in turn actually are offended and won’t vote for *them*.

Huh.

Comment #1: teac  on  10/22  at  04:37 PM

Yanno, it might help if she actually knew what the Vice President does.

I mean, I could apply to be a particle physicist on that Swiss supercollider project, but they might not hire me because I don’t know what a particle physicist or a supercollider actually do.  (SNOBS!)

Comment #2: Beast  on  10/22  at  04:58 PM

One of the most sickening things for me in this election has been watching right-wingers co-opt the language of the feminist movement to bash women who won’t vote for McCain.

Comment #3: killjoy  on  10/22  at  05:04 PM

One of the most sickening things for me in this election has been watching right-wingers co-opt the language of the feminist movement to bash women who won’t vote for McCain.

That on top of their decades of work toward making “feminist” a dirty word, which they’re now unsuccessfully attempting to claim.

Comment #4: annejumps  on  10/22  at  05:07 PM

Huh, teac, indeed. It’s so awful when people who base their entire philosophy upon othering get their wish.

Comment #5: Auguste  on  10/22  at  05:08 PM

(Don’t tell Auguste that I had to look up the expression “othering,” or that I plan to use it during my particle physicist/supercollider interview…”

Definitions of Othering

(from various online sources)

Popular Definition:

Othering is a way of defining and securing one’s own positive identity through the stigmatization of an “other.”  Whatever the markers of social differentiation that shape the meaning of “us” and “them,” whether they are racial, geographic, ethnic, economic or ideological, there is always the danger that they will become the basis for a self-affirmation that depends upon the denigration of the other group.  When a group claims to be “chosen by God,” the danger multiplies, not only for the “unchosen” other who may be subjected to violence, but for the chosen group itself that is at risk of being undermined.  [In other words, convenient though othering is as a way of propping up one’s ego, it has an inherent fragility because it must constantly led be fed by the illusory inferiority by the Other – and is thus constantly at risk of being discredited – MU]

Comment #6: Beast  on  10/22  at  05:15 PM

Oh my god.  Beast is trying to explain “othering” to the board.  Beast has never heard the term before Auguste mentioned it, so it must be a new term to ALL OF US.

Beast, did it ever cross your mind to read earlier posts and comments on this site?

They gave you a set of ovaries and a pretty face to smile for, and you’re so crazy and irrational that you can’t accept the gift of a token all gift-wrapped and pretty for you.

It’s like they gift-wrapped dog shit and don’t get why it’s not appreciated.  Or gift wrapped a scrub brush so you could go clean out their toilets.  Or stole your lollipop, dragged it on the ground, and then gift-wrapped it back to you.

Why the hell don’t you appreciate the gift!!!  Don’t try to confuse the issue with reason!  It was a gift!  You should be grateful.

Comment #7: Caren-Sun-blocking Creator of Animorphic Pancakes  on  10/22  at  05:30 PM

Oh my god.  Beast is trying to explain “othering” to the board.  Beast has never heard the term before Auguste mentioned it, so it must be a new term to ALL OF US.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Gee, sorry.

I agreed with Mr. Taylor’s post and thought the expression was cool.

Comment #8: Beast  on  10/22  at  05:36 PM

“Othering” can be more simply described as making the target out as “other” than fully human.

Comment #9: Ms Kate  on  10/22  at  05:39 PM

“Othering” can be more simply described as making the target out as “other” than fully human.

Ms Kate on 10/22 at 04:39 PM
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Thank you.  I’ve never heard it used before.  I usually wince when people do that noun-into-verb thing, but I’m like that one.

Comment #10: Beast  on  10/22  at  05:44 PM

Lay off of Beast.  They learned a new term and were excited by it, that’s all.

Comment #11: Em  on  10/22  at  05:46 PM

Beast, it’s only a noun-into-verb thing because it was originally translated from romantic languages and philosophical writings dating back to antiquity. Sometimes the literal translation sounds better than the adapted word and catches on in scholarly circles (although I see it most often written as “fear of the other”, I have seen “othering” in more than a few philosophy and religious dissertations).

It’s apparently just a word outside of your specific sphere. It’s very common in most discussions of vairous branches of philosophy and social politics (notably feminism and race issues). It’s a term that is in broad use to describe Nazi policy in Germany (did I just Godwin the thread?)

If you wanted to look at the concept of othering in the USA you could start with Dave Neiwert’s essays on eliminationism in America .

Comment #12: kodiak  on  10/22  at  06:02 PM

Yeah, Auguste. And what keeps occurring to me these days is, “Payback’s a bitch.”

As [they] sow, so shall [they] reap.

Did I tell y’all our thoughts for trick-or-treating? Wife & I, wearing our wedding whites, want to knock on married mixed-sex couples’ doors, yell, “Boo!” at them, then hand them divorce papers. That’ll threaten their marriages, no? wink

Comment #13: teac  on  10/22  at  06:06 PM

teac, I thought the Super Secret Gay and Lesbian Agenda required all heterosexual marriages to be dissolved en masse.  That’s the impression I get listening to the foam-mouthed nutcases coming unglued in support of Prop 8…

smile

Comment #14: MikeEss  on  10/22  at  06:14 PM

It’s apparently just a word outside of your specific sphere. It’s very common in most discussions of vairous branches of philosophy and social politics (notably feminism and race issues)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Well, that pretty much explains it.  I manage a small/large animal veterinary prectice.  That expression doesn’t get thrown around much in that venue.

Fine!  I’d never heard the expression “othering,” but I bet Caren has never spent any time with her arm up a dairy cow’s ass, either!  HAH!  Who’s the fool now?!

Comment #15: Beast  on  10/22  at  06:17 PM

Well, MikeEss, there is a paragraph in Appendix B (in the newest edition) stating that we can go “off book” from time to time, as long as we wreak the appropriate havoc.

So attacking traditional marriage one at a time is approved! Yea! smile

Comment #16: teac  on  10/22  at  06:23 PM

Fine!  I’d never heard the expression “othering,” but I bet Caren has never spent any time with her arm up a dairy cow’s ass, either!  HAH!  Who’s the fool now?!

The new definition of “good sport”: Beast.  This made me laugh out loud (oh, man, I tried to write LOL but I couldn’t do it).

Comment #17: killjoy  on  10/22  at  06:27 PM

They gave you a set of ovaries and a pretty face to smile for, and you’re so crazy and irrational that you can’t accept the gift of a token all gift-wrapped and pretty for you.

Cut them some slack.  They’re just coming to terms with the whole ovaries/uterus/sexual autonomy thing - they’re going to need another couple of decades to notice women have brains too.

Prepare, all ye non-white males.  (And ye white males who are otherwise occupied with not being resentful assholes.)

Fortunately we white males can simply hide in the privilege and pretend to be part of the Righteous Republican Crowd when it comes time for the pitchforks and burning torches.  I’m already practicing my “Burn Them LIEbrals!” chant.

Comment #18: Phoenician in a time of Romans  on  10/22  at  06:34 PM

Fine!  I’d never heard the expression “othering,” but I bet Caren has never spent any time with her arm up a dairy cow’s ass, either!  HAH!  Who’s the fool now?!

That’s fine with the people here, as long as the cow consented…

Comment #19: Phoenician in a time of Romans  on  10/22  at  06:35 PM

Oh my Disco Ball, this was priceless:

“You’ve got to ask yourself why was Senator Hillary Clinton not even vetted by the Obama campaign?” Palin continued. “Why did it take 24 years, an entire generation from the time Geraldine Ferraro made her pioneering bid until the next time that a woman was asked to join a national ticket?”

Yes, why did it take YOUR PARTY until 2008 to nominate a woman to the Presidential ticket - nearly a quarter-century after YOUR OPPONENTS did so?

The fact that some NOW officials are backing Palin reminds me, yet again, why NOW will never get a dime from me.

Comment #20: mythago  on  10/22  at  06:54 PM

The fact that some NOW officials are backing Palin reminds me, yet again, why NOW will never get a dime from me.

Oh, god, poor NOW.  The Republicans and “non-partisans” at The New Agenda are screaming blue murder over the fact that the national organization DIDN’T endorse Palin.

Comment #21: killjoy  on  10/22  at  06:58 PM

but I bet Caren has never spent any time with her arm up a dairy cow’s ass, either!  HAH!  Who’s the fool now?!

Well…no. 

But when I was little, I was helping my uncle take care of a sick calf and it peed all over me.  That’s how I learned it was a bull calf.  Aunt Bethel was not pleased, but I had a bit of a history of needing to have her wash my clothes b/c I got into something down on the farm.

Comment #22: Caren-Sun-blocking Creator of Animorphic Pancakes  on  10/22  at  09:30 PM

Oh, god, poor NOW.

Well, it’s not like this is their first dumbfuckery ever. Just that every time I start to soften up, something dumbass happens. Like supporting an anti-woman female candidate from an anti-woman party just because, like, she’s a mother! Also, white.

Comment #23: mythago  on  10/22  at  10:18 PM

Well, it’s not like this is their first dumbfuckery ever.

True.  I just feel like circling the wagons post-Palin nomination and the emergence of Teh New Feminizzum (which I hope will die after the election).

Comment #24: killjoy  on  10/22  at  10:48 PM

What the heck is http://slicedbreadtwo.com/  ???

Comment #25: AZ  on  10/23  at  01:32 AM

Yeah, Auguste. And what keeps occurring to me these days is, “Payback’s a bitch.”

My son simultaneously sanitized and Zen-infused a similar phrase: “Karma is a Female Dog”.

Comment #26: Ms Kate  on  10/23  at  08:53 AM

NOW needs a second-wave enema ... or would that be a douche?  I guess if you grow up with the idea that wealth and privilege should entitle you to something, male or female, you get exactly what these NOW types are spewing.

It is entirely possible to support Palin’s ability to perform all the roles she currently has without endorsing her for a job she clearly does not yet merit - just like supporting the ability of women to be firefighters early in their careers doesn’t mean they immediately should be the fire chief!

Comment #27: Ms Kate  on  10/23  at  08:56 AM

NOW needs a second-wave enema ... or would that be a douche?  I guess if you grow up with the idea that wealth and privilege should entitle you to something, male or female, you get exactly what these NOW types are spewing.

It’s not “NOW types”, it’s certain women in NOW who have defected from the organization.  NOW itself endorsed Obama.

Comment #28: killjoy  on  10/23  at  09:18 AM

The national organization endorsed Obama, but apparently not all of NOW agrees - at least, the link refers to these women as current NOW officials, not former. If it’s incorrect and these people jumped ship to ride the Caribou Barbie Train, then I take it back.

Comment #29: mythago  on  10/23  at  01:08 PM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.