Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: Don’t shoot a milk enema all over my leg and tell me it’s raining Previous entry: Ask the Patriarchy: LeBron and the Laws of Bromance

We need something like what Lilith Fair should have been

Music

Amanda Hess and Marisa Meltzer went on Soundcheck to debate the merits of the Lilith Fair, with there being a rough divide between pro-Lilith Marisa and anti-Lilith Amanda.  Which is oversimplifying things a bit—-Marisa conceded that the line-up in many places was boring and Amanda certainly didn’t have a problem with a female-oriented music festival to bring more attention to female musicians—-but that was the general divide.  It should surprise no one that I fall on the anti-Lilith side of the fence.  I heard somewhat interesting things about how they were getting away from the broomskirts and tambourines orientation of the previous Lilith Fair, but I didn’t find the New York line-up to be exciting enough to spend the money.  This was basically Amanda’s argument, too—-that it’s not about it being all female or somehow segregated that’s the issue.  It’s that the content itself is the problem; even in places with more exciting line-ups, there’s such a hodge-podge of acts that it’s a problem from a marketing perspective.  Concert festivals usually have an image and a set demographic they sell to, and “women” isn’t well-defined enough.  As Amanda noted, the old Lilith Fair’s strength was that it had this wussy folk music image.  Not something that I’d want to listen to, but at least it was something substantial you could market to fans of that music, and they did turn out.  The “festival for every kind of woman” thing comes across to actual flesh-and-blood female music fans as “a festival where you have to sit through a lot of shit you don’t like to hear something you do like”, whatever that something is.

It doesn’t help that Sarah MacLachlan is at the center of all this.  She could get away with it in the 90s, when she was a legitimate pop star churning out hits.  The narcissism of closing the festival every night was less obnoxious when she could point to her big hits and say she was the sort of person who closes shows.  But now?  She has a lot of musicians who are way bigger or more important than her by any measure, and they’re opening for her.  It’s distasteful, and makes it seem like the Lilith Fair is less about being pro-woman than being about making Sarah MacLachlan relevant again.  To make the whole MacLachlan situation even uglier, she’s been running around trying to conceal the feminist origins of Lilith Fair and repudiating the feminist label.  Soundcheck had examples of MacLachlan getting pissed at the idea of “politicizing” a festival of female musicians that was created in direct response to discrimination and prejudice aimed at women.  What’s not political about discrimination and prejudice?  She makes no sense, and playing the “I’m not a feminist, but” game is particularly ugly on a woman her age.

It’s also dishonest.  I remember the Lilith Fair the first time around, and it was about as political as it gets.  In fact, it was hard not to sympathize with the need for it.  The late 90s were a time of vicious anti-feminist backlash in rock music, which culminated in the violence and rapes during the Limp Bizkit set at Woodstock ‘99.  Women on the radio were relegated to earnest folk-tinged music that maximized non-threateningness.  A lot of the reason for this is pretty simple, which is that the early 90s flowering of alternative rock had finally been successfully co-opted by the corporate music industry, and most of the relatively independent radio stations had been bought up so that folks like Creed and Kid Rock could be passed off as “alt rock”.  It was a dark time.  Showcasing female musicians and pushing back against the dude-centrism of the radio was a good idea, but MacLachlan’s only response was basically to double down on the “women will stick to this corner fiddling on our acoustic guitars and leave the real rock music to the guys” mentality of the time.  Still, the notion that MacLachlan wasn’t trying to make a feminist statement is pure bullshit.  Much was made at the time of the name of the festival, named after a goddess figure who supposedly predated Eve and had to be rejected because she wanted equality with Adam.  Claiming this historical villain as a hero is absolutely a feminist statement, and to suggest otherwise confirms every negative suspicion that some of us have always had about MacLachlan.

Hats off to Marisa and Amanda for not getting trapped by the most irritating aspect of any discourse around Lilith, which is the question of whether we “need” it or if there’s something good or not about a women’s music festival.  The answer, if you’re pragmatic and understand history at all, is yes, and it will stay yes until women stop being marginalized in the larger music world.  Highlighting a marginalized group’s talents and diversity is the best way to get them mainstreamed, and often the only way to do this is through having these events that set out specifically to perform that task.  The question isn’t “Are women’s festivals a good idea?”, especially since they historically help instead of hinder mainstreaming women.  The question is whether or not Lilith Fair is any good at what it sets out to do.  The first incarnation failed in some major ways because it wasn’t threatening enough.  Some men were saying women can’t rock and their answer was to showcase a bunch of women who don’t rock (or fill in your term for kicking ass—-the most ass-kicking musicians I remember from the late 90s were Eryka Badu and the Dixie Chicks, who legitimately do challenge male dominance in the ways of rocking, even though they don’t play rock).  This incarnation has a lot more women doing interesting things, and some more diversity both in terms of what kind of music is being played and who is playing it, but by running away from feminism, they yet again avoid offering a direct challenge.  The task, in other words, is a legitimate one.  Sarah MacLachlan just isn’t the person to pull it off.

 

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Amanda Marcotte on 05:57 PM • (45) Comments

What qualifies as “women’s rock?”  Must the group be all female?  Must it be majority female?  Does having a woman in the group qualify? 

For example, I like the Yeah Yeah Yeahs, mainly because I really like Karen O’s vocals…  I doubt a man as lead singer would work.

Comment #1: James  on  07/19  at  06:48 PM

It looks like they divide up the stages into (roughly) big, medium, and small acts.

Why don’t they instead have different kinds of music on the different stages, and have it like a regular concert, where the little act opens and then the midsize act and then the big one?  Though maybe that would mean that MacLachlan would have less than a full house for hers if she’s competing with Jewel.

Then you could have a Jazz/Blues/Soul stage, a Rock stage, an Alt stage, something like that.  Whatever music the kids like these days.

Or divide it up by day, so that people who love Folk will have Sunday, rockers Saturday, something like that.

Not sure what “playing the “I’m not a feminist, but” game is particularly ugly on a woman her age” means.  How old/young do you have to be for it to be less ugly?

Comment #2: oldfeminist  on  07/19  at  07:20 PM

I read it as, she ought to know better at this point… that’s something that young women who haven’t really figured out what feminism is yet tend to say. I could be reading my own feelings into it though…

Comment #3: RacyT  on  07/19  at  07:31 PM

How about just promoting a festival concert series as Not Macho?  That would get me there, and it wouldn’t have to be about estrogen so much as a non-overdose of testosterone.  I’d rather see a female-friendly festival than a female-dominated one, though that’s probably just the Sarah MacLachlan nonfan-in-me speaking.

As for the politics and the hiding from the labels MacLachlan so proudly wore in yesteryear, that’s the economics of tours right now.  All the festival tours are suffering this year, and she’s trying whatever it takes to get work.  Unfortunately, the acts aren’t doing the right kind of tours at the right prices.  The time has come for a return to the bargain concert, but the venues are too tied to the Ticketma$ter and its moronic/parasitic business model to do that.

The music industry is dead.  Long live the music industry.

Comment #4: 3letterjon  on  07/19  at  07:33 PM

yeah it could work as a multi-genre act, but it would have to be big and expansive enough to fill multiple stages (acoustic folky stage, asskicking rock stage, indie pop/zooey deschanel stage, hip hop stage, untz-untz rave kid stage, etc) and should showcase artists liked by anyone in between the ages of fourteen and forty-eight.  for instance, i don’t understand who they think they’re getting to come to this who enjoys both sarah mclachlan and selena gomez.

Comment #5: chareth cutestory  on  07/19  at  07:37 PM

@ oldfeminist

I don’t know how Amanda feels about it, but I think “I’m not a feminist, but” is somewhat understandable coming from a college freshman (17-19ish), and gets progressively uglier from then on.  Of course, this only sort-of takes into account the political/feminist/backlash movements that people have lived through.

When I was in middle school, I think I would have placed the beginning of the “ugly” at the point of learning the definition of the term, but after the Bush years I cut young women a bit more slack before I allow myself to visibly sneer.

Comment #6: Atheist, A Feminist  on  07/19  at  07:39 PM

The other thing the big festivals do is not time things well.  It’s the usual rock star bullshit: now this Big Act stopped, so you have to run to some other stage and catch a Small Act or you could wait a long time for the sound checks and the drum set up for this other Big Act that will take its sweet damn time when it would be very easy with modern technology (real space age stuff like different channels for different microphones and amplifiers) so a soundcheck could be made during another act… it’s possible if the Big Acts will give up their egos and shows could be designed with the audience in mind.  That way, the huge stage could have three set ups: two small and one large.  And imagine: the music could be constant and no one would have to miss anything.

I saw Roger Daltrey last month.  Near the end of the show he said that he would usually run off before doing an encore.  But he said he no longer did the things younger rock stars did backstage for a few minutes, so he just stayed there and played more songs.  Funny how that worked out for everyone.  I’ve seen some very happy respectful performers lately: Ray Davies, Leonard Cohen, Roger Daltrey, and even Tom Waits didn’t do the encore bullshit.  They came to play, played, played some more, and had a wonderful time.

Comment #7: 3letterjon  on  07/19  at  07:42 PM

(shrugs shoulders)  Plain and simple: I thought about attending a Lilith Fair concert near me.  Then I saw the line-up and the price.  I don’t have that kind of disposable income; I want to be at least 95% sure that I’m going to be entertained for my money.  It is what it is.

Comment #8: algebrateacher  on  07/19  at  08:13 PM

I’m incensed by this Lilith Fair tour for purely selfish reasons.  I waited a year for Gossip to make their way to ATL in support of Music For Men.  They booked a show at a small, intimate club downtown - no more than a few hundred fans would be able to watch Beth Ditto peel the paint off the walls.  I bought tix for a half-dozen friends, who were admittedly less enthused than I was.  The day after the tickets arrived in the mail I got a call from the club where they were booked (The Loft) saying they had canceled the show “for health reasons” (although, Gossip did do a show in NY that same week they were originally booked to play). 

They booked a return visit to ATL is as part of fucking Lilith Fair, which stamped out the end of their American tour and any possible makeup dates.  Then, Lilith Fair canceled their ATL stop altogether. 

I had the tickets.  I still have the tickets.  They’re on the side of my fridge, taunting me every time I open the door.  Fuckers.

Comment #9: Swedgin  on  07/19  at  08:18 PM

I was a teenager in the 90’s and I never got into the Lilith Fair genre. Also, I was a teenage guy so I wasn’t that exposed to them; other than Sarah Maclachlan and Jewel (which I liked both).  But as usual, I fell prey to peer pressure and denied that I liked them because I didn’t want to seem like a “pussy.”  Sorry, at 16 or 17 it mattered much more than it does now.  :(    I knew Ani DiFranco and L7 but I didn’t really like them, besides a song here and there. 
But generally, thank god for the death of rap rock and cock-rock.
However, I think that currently, the best rock/indie acts are female fronted bands.  There is Metric (the best band in the last 5 or so years, IMO), Teagan and Sara, Phantogram, Rilo Kiley, Jenny Lewis (when she is solo), The Sounds, The Ravonettes, The Watson Twins, Ladyhawke and on and on. 
The mainstream music media to get away from the idea that female singers either strum a guitar while singing about flowers and guys and love or they dress up in bra, panties and heels to dance to a techno beat.
Maybe they could do a indie-Lilith Fair?

Comment #10: crepes not hate  on  07/19  at  08:54 PM

There is a pretty great (and getting to be long-running)  feminist hardcore/punk fest called C.L.I.T. Fest that I think offer a vastly superior alternative to the Lilith Fair.  Usually they include multiple days of performances by bands (all with female musicians), workshops on everything from bike repair to blogging to community response to sexual assault and a very strong commitment to keeping all the venues and spaces women-friendly/free of macho bullshit. 

The type of music performed at these events might not be everyone’s cup of tea (though the bands range from dance-pop to doom metal to good ‘ol anthemic punk), I do think it’s a great model of women (and men) putting shit together themselves rather than waiting for the music industry to do it for them. 

Anyhow, this year it’s in Portland.  Check it out if you’re so inclined: http://clitfestpdx.wordpress.com/

Comment #11: Loomer  on  07/19  at  08:58 PM

I was born in 1975, so the 90s were really my peak period of listening to music.  And looking back, I can really appreciate how many of my faves (compared with music now) were bands fronted by women or women solo artists.  Of the top of my head, I bought CDs by the following :

Tori Amos
Sarah McLachlan
L7
Skunk Anansie
K’s Choice
Veruca Salt
Diana Ah Naid (Australian singer)
Breeders
Bangles
Cranberries
Paradise Motel (great Australian band in the Portishead mould)
Moloko
Hole
Superjesus (Aussie band)
Tracy Bonham
Frente!

You get the idea.  Are there even half the comparable artists in the 2000-10 decade?

Comment #12: Aussiesmurf  on  07/19  at  09:50 PM

*headdesk*

Lilith isn’t a “goddess figure”; she was a folkloric demon (according to the Wikipedia article, which actually isn’t bad, the story is sourced to around the 8th century AD - not exactly a contemporaneous source). Sumerian and Babylonian mythology is full of really “did you guys have issues, or what?” depictions of goddesses as having voracious, dangerous sexuality, sort of divine praying mantises, often who killed children out of jealousy.

I get the reclaiming of the name and turning the image of a rebellious woman as evil into a strong woman and a source of pride, but I don’t think we need to retcon the mythology. (I have a similar reaction to people who try to portray Inanna or Anat as benevolent Mother Goddesses.)

Atheist @6, agreed, because young women may still be in that insecure stage where they’re terrified that the least imperfection will mean they will never, ever have a man be interested in them, so adopting the label “feminist” is very, very scary. Past that, though, it’s pathetic.

Comment #13: mythago  on  07/19  at  10:11 PM

Not sure what “playing the “I’m not a feminist, but” game is particularly ugly on a woman her age” means.  How old/young do you have to be for it to be less ugly?

She’s old enough to know better.  I hold women to the same standards I hold men—-a little stupidity in youth is acceptable, but she’s a grown ass woman.

Comment #14: Amanda Marcotte  on  07/19  at  10:16 PM

All the festival tours are suffering this year, and she’s trying whatever it takes to get work. 

And yet, as Amanda pointed out, the harder she runs from labeling it as anything, the more dates they have to cancel.

These are hard times.  The reaction to hard times is not to abandon your brand.  That’s basically choosing no customers over some customers.  MacLachlan’s notion that a no-brand approach is somehow the best approach is the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard.  You have to have a brand that stands for something, or you are a zero.

Comment #15: Amanda Marcotte  on  07/19  at  10:19 PM

Swegdin, a lot of festivals require artists to sign non-compete clauses.  I wouldn’t be surprised if Lilith Fair strong-armed the Gossip into canceling the smaller show.  It’s a major problem right now and creating more animosity towards festivals. 

mythago, that’s a really strong reaction to hang pedantry on.  If you’re going to be pedantic—-and it’s the internet, I get it, that’s how it rolls—-don’t hurt yourself in the process.  I’m little interested in the difference between a goddess and a demon, but I do care strongly that an overt feminist statement (regardless of your affection for its methodology) is still a strong feminist statement, and it’s annoying that MacLachlan can’t even stand by that.

Comment #16: Amanda Marcotte  on  07/19  at  10:23 PM

Yeah, why would you run from your branding? McLaughlan’d be a hell of a lot more relevant if she’d get out there and take a stand and just be like “yeah we are political and feminist as fuck, haters gonna hate,” and let the CONTROVERSIAL?? publicity roll in.

Comment #17: Dan  on  07/19  at  10:27 PM

Speaking not as a woman, nor as someone who particularly cares if a festival is all women, all men, or all burgandy hemaphrodites from Zeta Reticuli so long as the music is good, but as someone who does care about Canadian Artists…Amanda is right.  This is all about MacLachlan trying to be relevant again.

There’s a big push on right now, at least up this way, with her new album, making a big deal this is her first studio recording of new music in a decade.  Lillith Fair, whatever its original intent, allowed her to coast for years after people really stopped caring about her.  The current one smacks of advertising the new album.

Comment #18: KeithM  on  07/19  at  10:47 PM

McLaughlan got a bit of play on college stations back in the early 90s when she was considered part and parcel with the likes of Tori Amos (at the time), L7, the Breeders, Belly, DiFranco, etc. That’s the ONLY reason she got airplay. But the fact is she’s an easy-listening folkie cranking out pablum for aging boomers. She’s still trying to coast an indie-rock wave that wised up over a decade ago.

Comment #19: Mighty Ponygirl  on  07/19  at  11:15 PM

Apparently Ladyfest is still happening in cities all over the place. I don’t know if it’s still got the kind of bent that it had when Bratmobile was around, but that’s at least one alternative.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ladyfest?wasRedirected=true

Comment #20: jTuba  on  07/19  at  11:27 PM

The Lilith Fair brand is not one that sells, period.  I don’t like that MacLachlan is running away from labels either, but the feminist music festival has a selling point that doesn’t look good right now so sticking to her original something she allegedly stood for isn’t worth the effort, apparently.  Especially not in a down year.  I’m quite certain she’d be selling it the same way she did before if it was working.

As for it being something to promote MacLachlan more than anything else, that’s probably true but no more true than Lollapalooza was intended to make Perry Farrell’s veins filled as he wished or how Ozzfest keeps Ozzy well supplied with adult diapers.  Music tours are always about promotion and making money, and complaining about MacLachlan selling out or trying to sell out are about a decade and a half late.  It doesn’t matter how let down the Lilith Fair sisterhood may be, but the news that she was in it for herself isn’t exactly a shock unless you have sexist notions about women in business.

Comment #21: 3letterjon  on  07/19  at  11:31 PM

mythago, that’s a really strong reaction to hang pedantry on.

Without a trace of sarcasm, I actually have no idea what this means.

I care about this stuff because I’m a feminist as well as a pedant. Which, to me, means not whitewashing the history of how women’s power and sexuality were portrayed, and not handwaving about “goddesses” as though if it was divine and female and bad-ass, it’s automatically like totally Mother Goddess awesome and a positive symbol. As I said, I totally get the adoption of a traditional view of woman-as-evil-because-she-got-uppity into a symbol of power. But c’mon, let’s use “pedant” to mean something other than “someone who gives a shit about details that I find boring”.

If it helps unmiff you, I actually agree with you about MacLachlan. The way to be relevant is to be relevant, not to play diva and be as bland as possible on the theory that everybody likes vanilla.

(God, I miss L7)

Comment #22: mythago  on  07/19  at  11:41 PM

Maybe I’m just nostalgic, but I felt like Sarah McLaughlan was always the musician that girls I went to college with liked just b/c they didn’t really like music, in general, all that much, and it seemed like the thing to do. I never really knew a person who was seriously into music (I guess this would’ve been late high school-college ages) that liked her. I mean, I wouldn’t quit being friends w/ someone b/c she liked her, but oh yeah, I’d make fun of them, just like I made fun of my college roommate for liking Dave Matthews. Unserious.

And while I always made fun of Lilith before, I *was* excited that they had decided to resurrect the tour and go with it, especially in light of this Palin-type pheminism. Then I saw Sarah was headlining and the prices and was all “hell no.” The fact that she has personally pulled the “I’m not a feminist but” card and the CPC thing was the nail in the coffin.

Comment #23: SweetT  on  07/19  at  11:59 PM

Apropos of nothing—the last time I was at Lilith Fair (97 or 98) South Park Meadows was a venue, not a strip mall. 

I miss the shit out of a lot of aspects of late 90s Austin.

Comment #24: Ailuridae  on  07/20  at  12:43 AM

All this said, I still think there’s a place for Sarah McLaughlan and her music in the music world. Sometimes a good, middle-of-the-road, easy listening song can be just what I need. And yet, if the ticket prices for her concerts are too high, then I’d pass on it as well.

Comment #25: Ben F.  on  07/20  at  01:17 AM

I remember liking her being the background music in some episodes of Buffy. Never cared much for otherwise.

Comment #26: pharmakos  on  07/20  at  01:29 AM

@Loomer: C.L.I.T.fest is awesome. I got the DVD for the first show, unfortunatly the production value is… well, punk rock. smile I’d rather be there in person but I can’t do that sort of trip.

Comment #27: BlackBloc  on  07/20  at  01:56 AM

Aussiesmurf, I was born in 1974, and for me, the 90s were not a great time in music, aside from a few standouts. But now we have a ton of exciting women solo artists and bands featuring women. I just scrolled through my playlists alphabetically and here’s just a sampling of bands featuring women that are active now:  Arcade Fire, Crystal Castles, Dirty Projectors, Gang Gang Dance, Goldfrapp, La Roux, M.I.A., Metric, Micachu & The Shapes, My Brightest Diamond, Neko Case, Robyn, Rodrigo y Gabriela, Santogold, She & Him, Sleigh Bells, The Decemberists, The Go! Team, The Knife, The New Pornographers, The Pains of Being Pure at Heart, The Raveonettes, The xx, Vivian Girls, Yeah Yeah Yeahs. And that’s just a small sampling of artists that I like. There are plenty more that are awesome, but I’m just not a huge fan of, like The Gossip, Tegan & Sara, Lily Allen, The Kills or Amanda Palmer.

To me, what is called “indie” now is more varied and more interesting than what was called “alternative” in the 90s, when you really had to go out of your way to avoid the flannel brigade. What that decade had going for it, however, was the sheer amount of women who weren’t just playing in bands, but were the creative driving force of their bands. That’s a little harder to find now.

As far as Lilith Fair, the perception, fair or not, has always been that it ghettoizes women-made music into the folksy-unthreatening-guitar-strumming box. Even back in the day, the turn off for me was that they would feature 4-5 interesting artists in the midst of the folksy bore-fest. But now, they are really screwed, because the festival demographics have changed. It’s indie festivals that do well, and for that demographic there are 4-5 major options to chose from. Festivals are expensive, so everyone wants to make sure they see a ton of bands. They are not going to bother going to Lilith Fair for Tegan & Sara, when Tegan & Sara are likely also playing a ton of other festivals. And then, as Amanda points out, their demographic is just not well-defined. Women, like men, listen to a ton of different shit. So who is this thing ultimately for? Who is the audience and who are the performers? Just saying “women” isn’t enough.

I think that there’s just no need for the Lilith Fair anymore, as the audiences are clearly saying by not turning up. There’s a huge need to promote women in music, it’s just that the Lilith Fair is obviously not the way to do it. Maybe if they had smaller showcases of 5-10 bands, based on genre and location - like, in this city it’ll be folk, this one indie pop, this one country - it would be more useful.

Comment #28: elena  on  07/20  at  03:17 AM

...because young women may still be in that insecure stage where they’re terrified that the least imperfection will mean they will never, ever have a man be interested in them, so adopting the label “feminist” is very, very scary.

My niece and her friends (four of ‘em) have that attitude because they LOATHED their University of Washington feminist professor.  Apparently NOT the best spokesperson for the movement.

Comment #29: Eric_RoM  on  07/20  at  03:34 AM

I gotta say though, hating too much on folk music sort of comes across like that “devalue dumb feminized things! All glory to male-dominated careers/music/hobbies/etc.” thing that always happens.

Comment #30: Mayday  on  07/20  at  06:24 AM

Mayday, Sarah McLaghlan isn’t a folk singer. She’s easy listening adult contemporary.

Comment #31: Mighty Ponygirl  on  07/20  at  09:19 AM

I think Mayday is talking about elena talking about a folksy borefest. Personally, I admit it, I like folk music. *is dar williams folk music?*

Comment #32: shannon  on  07/20  at  11:20 AM

Which, to me, means not whitewashing the history of how women’s power and sexuality were portrayed, and not handwaving about “goddesses” as though if it was divine and female and bad-ass, it’s automatically like totally Mother Goddess awesome and a positive symbol.

You’re not talking about history, you’re talking about myth. Myth is metaphor and symbolism and poetry and metaphor, symbolism and poetry are perceived through the lens of culture. Lilith has been “retconned” a hundred times in the past five or so millennia. Re-interpreted by every emergent society that met the concept.

It’s not like anybody is claiming the mantle of a historical cult (like, say, neo-druids do). We’re just appropriating a symbol and reinterpreting it in light of our own culture. We do it all the time. Our culture is simply a lot more sexually egalitarian and a lot less ontologically chthonic than most any ancient peoples were, so dropping the bloody and terrifying aspects and highlighting the feminine and independence aspects of such a symbol is perfectly understandable.

Comment #33: Sarcastro  on  07/20  at  12:16 PM

elena, i think our playlists are soulmates.

Comment #34: chareth cutestory  on  07/20  at  12:35 PM

@Mayday

I don’t think that expressing a personal preference against folk music is the same as devaluing it because of its connections to femininity.

I hate knitting, but I don’t think that means that I devalue female labor.  I hate knitting because I find it to be too repetitive and too fidgetty.  That is a turn off for me.  I like to cross-stitch, but I don’t think that means I am celebrating female accomplishments.

In addition, I think some of the responses against folk music relate to the fact that folk music was pretty much all the original Lilith Fair offered and so reinforced the idea that women can only participate and enjoy already devalued/feminine things (which of course further devalues both women and the thing itself).

Comment #35: Atheist, A Feminist  on  07/20  at  04:04 PM

I agree with you Atheist! Folk isn’t my favourite music genre either, and I don’t mean to suggest no one can not like it without devaluing women. I meant the implications of folk music not just being unlikeable for personal reasons, but being wussy, po-faced, non-threatening, boring, as opposed to the realness of rock. Honestly, it probably wouldn’t have struck me that way if the folk fest where I live wasn’t always getting dumped on by people I know as a bunch of dumb hippies singing about their periods (not to imply that Amanda or anyone else was doing this). Sorry for being unclear.

Comment #36: Mayday  on  07/20  at  09:39 PM

I think Sarah McLachlan has some good songs. I don’t like her newer music that much, but Fumbling Toward Ecstasy and Surfacing are great albums. Sometimes, her songs are just what I can relate to at the moment. Let’s not assume that we all think she sucks, okay? I enjoy many of her lyrics.

It’s a mistake to assume that all women like the same kind of music. We don’t all like folk and singer-songwriter alternative stuff, but neither do we all like punk or rock. I like a wide variety of music, not all indie and not all popular. I like male-fronted rock music and female-fronted piano music, and vice versa (Elliott Smith is absolutely my favorite with an acoustic guitar). Tori Amos and Vienna Teng are awesome, and they don’t make rock music. I love seeing female rock musicians, don’t get me wrong, but that’s not the only music of value (not that I think you’re all saying that folk isn’t valuable, but I object to Amanda calling it “wussy”).

I can’t get into a lot of punk music that Amanda has recommended. I love Sleater-Kinney, but I just don’t enjoy Le Tigre or L7 that much, even if I appreciate their feminist politics.

I guess my opinion is that the music at Lilith Fair should be diversified and separated by day/stage depending on genre, as someone else suggested.

Comment #37: ArtOfMe  on  07/20  at  09:54 PM

Response to Atheist, a Feminist #35

reinforced the idea that women can only participate and enjoy already devalued/feminine things

And you know what I say? Heck yes women should enjoy folk if that’s what they like! Why SHOULD we subscribe to the debasement of feminine associated things? I take pride in a lot of those things. They don’t make us weak. It’s the popular masculine-oriented culture that has the problem. Sure, women don’t only like those things. But it’s perfectly fine if we do. It’s not MY problem that people might think acoustic guitar/piano music is stupid. I don’t let them decide what’s important to me.

I think it’s awesome when women do typically masculine-associated things, or succeed in male-dominated professions. Heck yes! But what if a woman wants to be a teacher/nurse, or wants to enjoy folk music that is no less passionate and feminist and powerful than rock music? Those things don’t make us weak. It’s only that we let popular culture tell us they are.

Comment #38: ArtOfMe  on  07/20  at  10:00 PM

ArtOfMe @37, I think that’s the point I was trying to make. Women don’t all like the same music, but to me it seemed that the original Lilith Fair was trying to equate “women’s music” with folk. To me, it was a narrow definition of what women could do in music. That was the part that made it a borefest, not necessarily folk itself (although I admit to not being a fan). I don’t think that any art form should ever be devalued because of its association with the “feminine”! I just think that an event like that should be more diverse, and that maybe it would be better to have smaller showcases by genre rather than trying to make everyone happy in the same event or have one genre dominate.

Comment #39: elena  on  07/21  at  03:18 AM

Yeah… that is pretty much exactly the thought I had when I heard Sarah MacLachlan was the headliner.

Comment #40: Caelan Aegana  on  07/21  at  07:35 PM

I saw the Slits once, in Chattanooga Tennessee.

That was fun, but I’d pay actual #@* money to see L7 or Bikini Kill.

I was actually at a radio station concert in high school in Norfolk that had Skunk Anise, but got there just in time to hear them finish up. That show was headlined by Kid Rock, which was fun. Stupid, and fun.


Orange Nine Millimeter, for bands with black people in them that came out of the punk thing (like Skunk), there set was good, but looking back on it from (shit, ten years?) distance, they were working an arena crowd the way you’d try to hit people in a basement show.

Comment #41: Indy  on  07/22  at  01:02 AM

I remember the 2 Lilith Fair shows I went to as being very exciting and packed with talent: Eryka Badu, the Pretenders, Natalie Merchant, the Indigo Girls and also Sarah Mclachlan (the second year I do remember a lot of folks walking out on her, but, hey, I’m a big fan).  I also had the privilege of seeing guest appearances of Bonnie Raitt and Joan Baez. On the second stage I also remember K’s Choice and Cibo Matto (playing with Sean Lennon).  Someone was handing out tapes of the amazing Irish singer Sinead Lohan while we were in line (sadly it seems no longer recording).  I had started out thinking why would anyone listen to this as someone posted “soft” music,  but that changed when I got into Sarah Mclachlan and Tori Amos (they couldn’t be more different in their outlook). By the time I had got there I was really into female singers of all types—Sinead O’Connor (huge), Storm Large (still going strong) Tori Amos, Sleater Kinney, L7, Jewel, Shawn Colvin, Luscious Jackson, Missy Eliott, Queen Latifah, Liz Phair and many more. Of course, my wife has salted my musical tastes with more male voices since then.

And yeah I didn’t go this year….nor did I rush out to get the new Sarah CD

Comment #42: logsama  on  07/22  at  05:21 PM

Speaking not as a woman, nor as someone who particularly cares if a festival is all women, all men, or all burgandy hemaphrodites…

Uh, Keith, the term is intersex, not “hermaphrodite.” Oh, and is that the gender version of “invoking strangely colored people”?

Comment #43: Nobody in Particular  on  07/23  at  09:15 AM

После обеда прошли вдоль старого порта, где хорошо сохранились несколько городских укреплений (Форты Бас-Сент-Никола и д’Антркасто, с одной стороны,  форт Сент-Жак – с другой, через залив). Также хорошо видны несколько церквей: две поновее в самом порту 70-647, классические, чуть дальше – мрачноватая базилика Сент-Виктор, возведенная аж в 1040 г.

Ближе к выходу из порта находится дворец Фаро с небольшим садиком вокруг. Дворец сейчас реставрируется, в садике играют дети. С террасы открывается замечательный вид на порт  и припортовые районы, хорошо видны громада кафедрального собора и форт Сент-Жак HP0-D07.

Рядом с дворцом Фаро (собственно, на его территории) расположены комплексы Института тропической медицины  и Средиземноморского университета. Студенты и научные сотрудники прогуливаются по садику и валяются прямо на газонах, почитывая книжки 70-649.

Времени до поезда у нас оставалось немного, а мы еще собирались взглянуть на остатки римского поселения. От еще более древнего, греческого города Массалия (основанного около 600 г. д.н.э.) строений не сохранилось, только мелкие предметы да еще одна более или менее целая …лодка. Ее, впрочем, мы посмотреть не успели E20-001 – только мельком взглянули на Сад Руин, который входит в комплекс археологического музея Марселя. В остатках римского поселения уютно устроились спасть кошки (точно, как в Риме! Они почему-то страшно любят эти старые известняковые глыбы).

Comment #44: riyanjason  on  07/23  at  09:25 AM

When the new Lillith Fair was touted earlier this year, I thought I might get to see the Go-Gos, the Bangles, and Metric. (!!)  In Nashville!!  Maybe even Kelly Clarkson!  But they ended up canceling.  I’m a guy (and love the previously mentioned), and I have two girl kids, and it sounded great.  Not sure if the shitty economy killed this or what, but I would’ve loved to have seen any of those bands.  They had something good planned, and it didn’t work out somehow. 

Plus side, my lil child is going to see Paramore (not a favorite of mine, but kinda rockin’ and female fronted) ina few weeks, so WIN.

PS My kid might be able to read the previous comment, but I can’t.

Comment #45: geoff  on  07/24  at  12:47 AM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.