Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: Ohio homobigot lawmaker vies for Sally Kern’s tiara Previous entry: Scotty on the emperor with no clothes

What do you think?

Pandagon


Cool panda picture on a hot day.

I’m extremely excited about the new changes afoot here at Pandagon.  We’ve had a server change, a software change (Wordpress to Expression Engine, for those curious), and a complete redesign to bring the site looking both modern and with the retro flair that pretty much defines what’s modern now.  But that’s just the beginning of the changes we’re going to see during this summer.  We’re looking at the biggest changes we’ve faced in three years, and I for one think this is going to be a bigger, more badass Pandagon that lives up to the badassery of our animal of inspiration.

Please leave comments, complaints, criticisms, compliments and come-ons in the comments of this post.

 

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Amanda Marcotte on 12:11 PM • (209) Comments

Wow—what a slick design! Big thumbs-up!

It’s a little on the wide side, people with lower-resolution screens might find it difficult to read since they’ll have to scroll all the way to the right in order to read the content.

Comment #1: Mighty Ponygirl  on  05/28  at  12:25 PM

Hmmm.  Change is always a bit of a nuisance to get used to but initial perspective is OK.

Comment #2: Richard  on  05/28  at  12:27 PM

I like the design overall, but maybe because of the “wideness” Mighty Ponygirl mentioned the brown bar on the left is cutting into the text making the black font difficult to read.  Also, for some reason I’m having to scroll way down to get past the adds and to the top post.  I know nothing about site design so anybody who know’s why this is happening and if it’s something I can fix on my end let me know.

Comment #3: Olivia  on  05/28  at  12:28 PM

Not a big fan of the new design, although I think it would be just fine if the menu/adspace was on the right side like it used to be.

Comment #4: swarmofseals  on  05/28  at  12:31 PM

I like the header and the menu bar on the left.

I don’t like the actual content pushed all the way over to the right however.  Would prefer menu on left, blog in center, adspace on right.

overall very slick looking (in a good way).

Comment #5: catswym  on  05/28  at  12:34 PM

Design is fine by me, once it starts working properly.  Content and the top banner should clearly be in the white space at right, starting near the top of the page, not starting in the brown ad banner, below the ads.

Yay for no funny numbers!  (Let us hope the bots allow us to stay funny-number free.)

Congrats on the new page.

Comment #6: libdevil  on  05/28  at  12:40 PM

Wow, went to register and it says we’re not allowed to be vulgar?  Seriously?  Here?  Delaying registration in hopes that the TOS will be rewritten to be more in line with the Pandagon experience.

Comment #7: libdevil  on  05/28  at  12:42 PM

I’m liking this a lot better than blogsome already.

Comment #8: watermelontail  on  05/28  at  12:48 PM

Agree with catswym about the layout.  Don’t like having the text all the way on the right.

Comment #9: Betsy  on  05/28  at  12:48 PM

Side ads are somehow more obnoxious with this layout, probably because they’re on the left instead of the right.  Was that a conscious decision to increase ad visibility?  Since I read RTL, I tend to spend more cognitive effort not looking at the ads than I did before.  Content trumps ads.

Comment #10: JoeBlu  on  05/28  at  12:49 PM

We fixed the Terms of Service.  If you sign up, you are permitted to curse your head off in comments.  I promise we will not boot you for profanity.

Comment #11: Amanda Marcotte  on  05/28  at  12:50 PM

BLUF: I prefer it to the old site design.
Like others, I’d prefer the content in the middle instead of on the far right.  Also, the four icons directly under the Pandagon name look out of place.  On the positive side, I’m a big fan of the “Previous entry” and “Next entry” tabs on top of each entry.  Also, the “Recently” portion of the menu bar.  Also also, that there is no longer unreadable numbers for me to type in each time I want to post.  I think I love that best of all.

Comment #12: redlegphi  on  05/28  at  12:53 PM

Put my vote in with catswym’s.  Otherwise, a hearty thumbs-up!

Comment #13: grimsaburger  on  05/28  at  12:53 PM

I’m with the others here ... I don’t like the two columns on the left, as it pushes the actual blog too far to the right ... makes the whole blog seem unbalanced, not to mention with my smaller ibook screen I need to scroll sideways ...

I’d say have the navigation menu on the left, the advert menu on the right, and have the blog in the middle.

And the design in general? Honestly, not my cup of tea. Seems a little 1997 freeware web-editor to me.

Comment #14: Sarah in Chicago  on  05/28  at  12:58 PM

What Olivia said.  The content is pushed way down the page and squashed into the brown bar.  Nice design, though; fix the layout issues and it’ll be great.

Comment #15: Tom Hilton  on  05/28  at  12:58 PM

Agree with critcisms above.  Especially the brown column covering black print.

Comment #16: Libertarian  on  05/28  at  01:02 PM

The new color scheme looks great, and I like the new comment system. Having both sidebars on the left makes it a bit hard to read though. Also, the new Panda-Banner looks cool, though I do miss the old one.

Comment #17: inkybrain  on  05/28  at  01:02 PM

I feel mixed about it, though I know it’ll all be better in a couple days whe I gget usetd tod it. 

OK, there are serious problems with this comment text box.  WTF?

This is the only BIG problem I’m having so far.  Is it just me?et

Comment #18: The Opoponax  on  05/28  at  01:04 PM

I’d also point out that our email address is no longer hidden from view but is clickable out of our name.  Not a big issue for me and my yahoo address, but some might not want their email address to be known by the wider community.

Comment #19: redlegphi  on  05/28  at  01:05 PM

I too would prefer the content in the middle, not on the far right.  If I had my preference, “clicky” stuff like the nav bar would be on the right and “looky” stuff like ads on the left.

Comment #20: human  on  05/28  at  01:06 PM

Holy shit. Well this is just… spiffy. I kinda miss the grumpy panda in the tub already, though. Maybe you could put a tiny version of her at the bottom of one of the sidebars, just for ol’ times’ sake.

Comment #21: aman  on  05/28  at  01:07 PM

I’d prefer content on the left as well.

I like the header font.

I don’t mind the ToS saying you can’t be vulgar. Depends on the definition to vulgar.

Curse words? Not vulgar. They’re just words.

Approving comments regarding evo psych? THAT’S vulgar smile

Comment #22: Karmakin  on  05/28  at  01:09 PM

I am in complete agreement with Sarah in Chicago.  So… what she said.

Also, I think the old site was a bit more “serious” looking.  Not sure how to describe it, but I prefered it.

Comment #23: SarahMC  on  05/28  at  01:14 PM

I have a horizontal scroll bar. That’s annoying. (My screen is set to 1024x768.)

Also, the preview page is messed up; I see four boxes for personal information, and the “Remember my personal information” text is missing.

Comment #24: Doug S.  on  05/28  at  01:14 PM

Ooooh, I don’t like that email addresses (which are required) are public.  Is that really necessary?

Comment #25: SarahMC  on  05/28  at  01:16 PM

I likey.  I don’t seem to be having troubles with the wide format, but I have a wide screen.  No brown bar either.

Comment #26: Melissa  on  05/28  at  01:16 PM

I agree about content vs. ad placement; the content should be central.  I also think that overall things are too busy, and the lines are not clean enough.

Also, comments are no longer numbered; was that intentional?  I have a significant preference for numbered comments.

Comment #27: Go Amie  on  05/28  at  01:17 PM

What they said. Also, the double bars around the comments are kinda distracting and a waste of space. (I really kinda liked the old design.)

(Also I hatehatehatehatehate smileycode in the comments, but that’s just me)

Comment #28: paul  on  05/28  at  01:17 PM

There is A LOT of “white space” on the page, that could be filled if the actual posts/comments were stretched out (and centered).  I don’t like that the comments spill over to page two after only 20 or so.  I liked the format on the old site, where one thread was contained in one page and one page only.

Comment #29: SarahMC  on  05/28  at  01:22 PM

Whoa, email addresses are public?  THIS IS NOT COOL.  Please delete my previous comment ASAP (this one is using a fake email address).

Comment #30: Go Amie  on  05/28  at  01:24 PM

Seriously, do you know how hard I have worked to keep personally identifiable information separate from my online names?  It is completely and totally non-standard, and highly inappropriate, to show people’s email addresses - I want mine gone NOW.

Comment #31: Go Amie  on  05/28  at  01:28 PM

Not liking that the comments spill over to a second page either.  Also, I now have to click on “Comments” to get the comments to appear on the post page, whereas on the old site they were just listed underneath the post on each post page.  But now I"m really just nitpicking.

Comment #32: redlegphi  on  05/28  at  01:33 PM

Ah man, am I the only one who has a problem? I’m viewing from a work machine (so any “change the browser” fixes are out) and I see the column of red and then a column of black… that goes RIGHT OVER the black text of the posts. To read them I have to highlight them. Also (and I’m assuming this is the real problem) the ads are all clustering at the top of the page (in the ‘old’ version they clustered at the bottom for me… which I saw as a feature, not a bug) so I have to scroll past them all to get to the meat of things.

Oh, and I second the comment about not making our e-mails spam-bot-searchable (or troll searchable, but it’s really the bots that are the problems imo)

Oh, and I’m using IE v6.0 if that makes any difference.

Comment #33: kodiak  on  05/28  at  01:42 PM

I agree with everyone else who doesn’t like the two columns on the left, but I’m commenting to report a bug with the new RSS feed.

When I read it on my RSS reader all of the paragraph breaks are stripped out. Is there anything you can do about that?

And another niggling point: It would be nice for commenters to know if their email address will be kept private or not. Right now the form doesn’t say either way, so unless you’ve commented before you won’t know. There’s also no indication that it’s a required field.

Comment #34: Kutsuwamushi  on  05/28  at  01:43 PM

Using Internet Explorer 6.0, with a text size set at medium, the articles are pushed way down, below the last entry in the inboard sidebar.

Comment #35: Dana  on  05/28  at  01:45 PM

Yeah, if email addresses are going to be published, there really needs to be a warning so that people can choose to use a fake one (or just not comment). That’s a big deal.

If you could, I’d like my previous comment to be removed as well.

Comment #36: Kutsuwamushi  on  05/28  at  01:47 PM

I like it! But the Brady Bunch may call and want their font back.

Comment #37: SamFromUtah  on  05/28  at  01:54 PM

Um, yeah. Wipe my comments too, if the emails are going to be published.

Comment #38: SamFromUtah  on  05/28  at  01:55 PM

I noticed that my blog (not my email address) is showing up on mouseover, while other folks are getting their emails showing up (I assume it’s because they did not put a url in the space).  A possible fix I can think of is to put some spurious url in that space.

Comment #39: watermelontail  on  05/28  at  01:57 PM

I see Kutsuwamushi hit on that solution as well.

Comment #40: watermelontail  on  05/28  at  01:59 PM

I agree with those who say:
1. say that the content should be central, not off to the right;
2. don’t like the comments stretching out over multiple pages (which will be hell on long, involved threads);
3. that they don’t really like the retro look.

Sorry, but you did ask.

Comment #41: seeker6079  on  05/28  at  01:59 PM

Change is a universal constant; without change, things become stagnant and ossified.  Progressivism is all about change.

I’ll just agree with the others on the minor nitpicks about column layout and email addresses being public (you commenters shouldn’t be using an email address you want kept private anyway; just get a throwaway Hotmail account and use that).  Overall, it looks good.  Colorful, energetic, it has character.  We’ll get used to it soon enough!

Comment #42: liberalrob  on  05/28  at  02:00 PM

changing the text size didn’t change anything for me but the ads… so viewing at medium text IE 6.0 still has the posts spilling over through the black column.

Comment #43: kodiak  on  05/28  at  02:06 PM

Looks good!
Though I’d like to add to the chorus & vote for the ads to occur on the right of the blog—kind of a pain to always be scrolling right to get to the good stuff. smile

Comment #44: t6283798  on  05/28  at  02:23 PM

I don’t like that comments go into multiple pages.  I’d rather they all show up in one long thingie so you can ctrl-F to pick up where you left off reading earlier.

Comment #45: yellan  on  05/28  at  02:24 PM

Love the new site. I don’t comment much but do thank you for all the great info and interesting posts.

Comment #46: smash  on  05/28  at  02:25 PM

I’m not liking the display of email address with comment or the whole register/login thing.  Sarah in Chicago covers most of my other thoughts.

Comment #47: togolosh  on  05/28  at  02:25 PM

Congratulations! Who is the designer?

What I like:
* The return of the old domain
* The left-hand menu
* Grooviness

What I don’t like:
* Source order—ads before content makes browsing on my handheld a pain in the ass
* Content to the right of the ads
* Paginated comments

Change is neither good nor bad. Sure I liked the previous design, but we humans are quick to adapt and will be used to this in no time.  I just hope you might be able to take some of the criticisms here in the constructive spirit and improve the overall usability of the site.  Congratulations again.

Comment #48: Cris  on  05/28  at  02:32 PM

Love the new look.  LOVE the header with the icons.  Also, I am strange I guess, but I enjoy reading on the right.

Also not cool with names linked to email addresses, should link to blog when given.

Also not getting paragraph breaks in my reader (Bloglines).

Love the colors and the fonts!

Comment #49: lizriz  on  05/28  at  02:33 PM

Too wide, scrolls horizontally (1024 pixels here)
Can’t use Opera’s “fit to width” either
Feed now unusable, used to read entire articles from it when I was offline (on bus/metro/etc.)
Comments don’t show right away, need to click twice to get at them from feed
... then they paginate, after 20 or so entries. You regularly get 100+ comments!

Comment #50: KJK::Hyperion  on  05/28  at  02:34 PM

The brown bar makes it difficult to read the text.

Comment #51: Jodi  on  05/28  at  02:35 PM

I think it’s cool. I especially like the moire panda logo.

Comment #52: Bitter Scribe  on  05/28  at  02:38 PM

Um, did anybody else get the bottom of the comments, click next page, and end up at the beginning of the comments thread again?

Like many others, I like the color scheme but wish the blog was in the middle.  Also, comments broken up into pages is a big pet peeve of mine, but since I know nothing about setting up web-pages and blogs I don’t know if this is under your control or not.

Hmm, this is making me itch to rearrange my living room.

Comment #53: carovee  on  05/28  at  02:38 PM

Nearly fell off my chair this morning.  Aesthetically (colour, font, image) I’m easy, because it goes to subjectivity and taste, not to mention the prerogative of site-owners whose right it is to set the tone and style. 

I would definitely prefer that my email address (even if mine IS a throwaway Gmail addy and not my principal one) not be viewable, and I also echo yellan about preferring all comments on one page (though there will probably be an equal number of readers who disagree, so it’s perhaps moot).

Looks like a lot of work went into this thing—cheers to your big day.

Comment #54: Ranylt  on  05/28  at  02:41 PM

Looks like several changes are already in effect. Somebody is reading our comments and acting, as we speak!

Do you mind telling us who is handling your hosting?

Comment #55: Cris  on  05/28  at  02:41 PM

come-ons:

Aw, come-on, do you really expect me to update my bookmarks with every move?

Oh, that button, there?  Ok, nevermind.

Comment #56: djw  on  05/28  at  02:42 PM

For those worried about their e-mail addresses, if you have a site url entered, it defaults to showing that rather than your e-mail address.

Comment #57: Dana  on  05/28  at  02:42 PM

liberalrob, the point is that at the blogsome site (and I believe at the old pandagon.net), email addresses were by default never displayed.  This is standard at several other sites too (Feministe and Shakesville come to mind).  Now they are by default displayed (and you are required to enter one), which is a major change that happened with no warning. 

At sites where I know my email will be displayed, I do use a “fake” one.  But I used my real email at Pandagon because I knew no one but the mods would see it, and if they needed/wanted to get in touch with me, I wanted them to be able to use the email I’d actually read.

Comment #58: Caroline  on  05/28  at  02:49 PM

very difficult ... I can’t read text under the brown stripe, and ads ads ads at the top are annoying.  Almost like we are expected to have wide screen everywhere ... except it doesn’t render properly in firefox at home on a wide screen, either.

The basic shell is there ... still needs a lot of work to get things in their proper places and readable, too!

Comment #59: Ms Kate  on  05/28  at  02:50 PM

I heartily approve of the picture.

And the site now takes much less time to load.  A definite plus in my book.

Comment #60: Erika  on  05/28  at  02:50 PM

Admin rocks.

Comment #61: Ranylt  on  05/28  at  02:51 PM

Prefer the content centered - the page feels unbalanced to me.

Comment #62: syfr  on  05/28  at  02:54 PM

How long should I expect to wait until I get that email containing membership activation instructions?

Comment #63: Cris  on  05/28  at  02:54 PM

Er… on my work machine (IE 6.0 medium font size) black bar covers up left side of article, need to highlight to see it.  Also, I had to scroll past all the ads to get to the article—kinda weird.  New look is great, but spacing seems to be a problem.  Can Rust/Black/White sections of page be set to percentage rather than fixed width?  (pulling html knowledge out of the rusted-shut storage center in my brain)

Comment #64: Sissy  on  05/28  at  02:55 PM

Oh snap! There’s no bookmark identifier that allows us to link directly to an individual comment!  Surely this will change.

Comment #65: Cris  on  05/28  at  03:00 PM

I’m having the same no-paragraphs problem with the rss feed (using Google Reader, if it matters).  As for the redesign, it’s fine in my book, but my opinion doesn’t matter much since I primarily read the site through the feed.

Comment #66: ryan  on  05/28  at  03:09 PM

Overall, love the look of the site. That said, I don’t like the location of the ads, I feel it puts more emphasis on them than the navigation bar.

Comment #67: Ashley  on  05/28  at  03:09 PM

How long should I expect to wait until I get that email containing membership activation instructions?

Mine showed up in about half a second.

Comment #68: Sarcastro  on  05/28  at  03:13 PM

wow! and thanks! to the admin for monitoring this and fixing many of the problems noted. Speedy work like that is teh awesome!

(now about that black on brown problem….)

Comment #69: kodiak  on  05/28  at  03:16 PM

I also read through a feedreader and the content is pushed way off to the right, because of both info bars being on the left. I’m a fan of content-on-left, info-on-right, but that may just be me.

Snazzy look though and I like the colorso.

Comment #70: jnfr  on  05/28  at  03:27 PM

I like the general style of the website, but I really prefer the text to be more towards the center of the screen.  Not that I’m in charge, but I’d like to see the brown bar moved to the left of the screen and the text centered.  Also handy for the wideness problem, so that if you are using a narrower window, the blog entries are still there.

Comment #71: Zardeenah  on  05/28  at  03:27 PM

Probably worth noting that splitting the two bars up would appear to leave the cute widdle panda with nowhere to go.

Comment #72: Julia Justa  on  05/28  at  03:32 PM

I want numbered comments to refer back to.  And I’m a wierdo who likes the comments on the right.

Comment #73: Melissa  on  05/28  at  03:32 PM

Yikes… sorry, don’t like this layout at all. First off, it’s wider than my actual screen—I have h-scroll. The top banner is enormous—between that and the sidebars the actual content is scrunched into like 1/4 the size of a window. Layout shouldn’t overwhelm content. The “shilling” bar in particular is ridiculous—it looks awkward right next to the other sidebar and there’s only about two inches of content there. Past those three ads you’re then left with this enormous black bar running all the way down the page, just wasting space.

If it were me, I would suggest one of these two things, either:

1. Kill the black bar and move your “shilling” into the top banner. There’s room… or
2. On the other hand the black bar might look less weird if it were on the other side framing the content rather than shoving it off the right side of the page. Maybe move the black bar to the right side, and reduce the size of the top banner by putting the searchbox/logo/badges horizontally alongside each other rather than just stacking them as you do now.

*Very* happy to have a preview function. Though have you tried the preview function? There’s some glitches. Some of the images disappear, some of the text goes white, and a mysterious “location” box appears. I think the relative paths to some of your interface elements break when you’re previewing.

Will your archives be coming back?

Comment #74: mcc  on  05/28  at  03:35 PM

Couple of minor points:

- the powder-blue lines are unnecessary visual noise, as are the thick outlines surrounding each comment entry.
- you should at least vary the baseline of the retro font graphics so that identical letters (shilling, most notably, but see also ‘members’) don’t look weird. That’s essential for this hand-painted hippie font to look nice.

Comment #75: Shaz  on  05/28  at  03:40 PM

I really hate to party poop here, but it looks like monkey butt to me. My IE is putting the banner waaay down the page, while at the top is only a left bar crammed with ads and a bunch of white space on the right. I can’t read the bits of text that drift into the black bar, either.

Comment #76: the matthew show  on  05/28  at  03:51 PM

Difficult to read the text when it transitions from a dark color to white.  Things are overlaid and covered up with my browser, which SHOULD be pretty up to date, since this is an government computeing system…  I don’t know.  I hate change for the sake of change.  Yeah, Wordpress is pretty crappy, but I dislike new fancy stuff that doesn’t work as good as it used to.  I hardly ever read FDL because of those reasons, and I CAN’T read HuffPo on my home computer.  I think that blogs (not necessarily this one) should really consider the impact on readers, who may not have the most up to date equipment, before they really going whole hog with changes.  I mean, I never have problems with looking at web sites for newspapers or magazines, but many blogs, I just cannot even open any more.  I would say this is indicative of problems with the blog updates, not the readers computer system.

Comment #77: zeppo  on  05/28  at  03:51 PM

Like a few others above, I have a lot of trouble reading when the content is on the right of the page, especially when the columns to the left of the text are boldly-colored.

Comment #78: Cooper  on  05/28  at  03:56 PM

Yeah, I must admit to certain display issues, too.  Everything is much too far to the right, especially for Pandagon.

More importantly, Mr. Taylor, could you bring Ezra Klein back?

Comment #79: mds  on  05/28  at  03:56 PM

I love everything except that its right-aligned. I visit so many other sites that are center or somewhat to the right that left aligned has always been something I like about pandagon.  Maybe if the colors were different and they weren’t so bold, but I actually really like the color scheme. As English readers, we are trained to read right to left so its kind of annoying. I do hope you will consider left aligning.

Comment #80: Tara E  on  05/28  at  04:04 PM

And with more and more people reading on mobile devices, I would avoid having a horizontal scroll bar if you can. I am also on a pretty good resolution and I have a horizontal scroll bar.

Comment #81: Tara E  on  05/28  at  04:07 PM

Fix the Brown Bar, please!

Comment #82: mofo  on  05/28  at  04:13 PM

Another strong vote for left-alignedness.  VERY hard to read on the right.

Comment #83: laurelin  on  05/28  at  04:16 PM

Not a big fan of the cartoony type. It’s at odds with the color scheme. Your type says fun, your colors say not fun.

Comment #84: shoeshineboy  on  05/28  at  04:30 PM

My little computer screen just isn’t coping.  The header is huge, the left bars are noisy, and I have to scroll to the right to read the coment.  Also, the boxes around each comment are a little much.  The Shilling column on the right would clear some things up.  Also, smilie-code is of the devil. 

Congrats on the new site, though.  Will be looking into the choice of software—always interesting to find something new.

Comment #85: Anpan  on  05/28  at  04:40 PM

Very. very cool.  Now I can say that I read a blog that is on the Far Right! wink

Comment #86: coturnix  on  05/28  at  04:48 PM

Not to sound like a complaint—it’s not; the general design looks good—I’m running IE 6.0.2900, and a large number of ads are stacked up on the left (Within the Red and Brown vertical bars), and the Pandagon title and navigation bar pushed *way* down the page—I couldn’t see it until I scrolled nearly two ‘screens’ down at 1024X768 resolution. 

The left-hand portion of any black text (the posts below the panda photo; the identifiers for Name, Email, Remember my information, etc.) isn’t easily read against the brown vertical bar.

Otherwise, it’s a nice redesign!

Comment #87: A Person  on  05/28  at  04:49 PM

Overall, very nice! The one detail that I am having a very hard time getting used to is the two narrow columns on the left. I keep feeling like I’m about to fall over to the right ... and no, I haven’t been drinking again!

Comment #88: Stephen  on  05/28  at  05:01 PM

The left-hand portion of any black text (the posts below the panda photo; the identifiers for Name, Email, Remember my information, etc.) isn’t easily read against the brown vertical bar.

Ditto for me, minus the “easily”: the black-on-brown text is completely illegible in my browser. Even the red links at the top are really jarring as they cross the divide from brown to white.

FWIW, if the design stays, I’m not going to read Pandagon anymore; no offense, but cutting and pasting every post into a text file just won’t be worth it.

Oddly, as I do more on the site, some of the black text has magically transformed to white. Is this a CSS problem? If so, your designer needs to figure out what kind of cross-browser voodoo is causing these problems.

Comment #89: Picador  on  05/28  at  05:20 PM

Dude, there’s no come-ons in here.

Comment #90: Amanda Marcotte  on  05/28  at  05:22 PM

Another vote for center aligning the text. I have to scroll over to read it as it is now. Numbered comments would be good, especially as discussion get lively and we are quoting each other.

Otherwise, looks good.

FTY, using Mac OS 10.3.9 and Safari 1.3.2. (Yeah, it’s old, and it IS time for me to get a new computer. Maybe when my “stimulus” check finally comes.)

Comment #91: Coyoteville  on  05/28  at  05:26 PM

The layout isn’t displaying properly on my laptop, so much so that the site is fairly unreadable. I’m running IE6 on Windows XP, if you’re interested for debugging purposes.

Comment #92: Mike T  on  05/28  at  05:32 PM

Is too wide (iBook, Safari 3, 1024x768). Horizontal scrolling hurts the baby pandas. Put the main column in the middle, move the brown bar to the right, pls thx bai.

Comment #93: pseudonymous in nc  on  05/28  at  05:33 PM

It looks ok, I do like the colors.  I just find it weird that if I click on the headline I am taken to a page with just the post, but to see the comments I have to click on the comments link.  I get by just clicking on the comments link in the first place off the main page I can see the comments, it just seems like you would be taken to comments by going to the headline link as well.

Comment #94: hk  on  05/28  at  05:39 PM

I, too, have to scroll to the right to see the content. Prefer it on the left or in the center. Thanks for asking.

Comment #95: Shari  on  05/28  at  05:45 PM

purty.

Comment #96: Pope Ratzo  on  05/28  at  05:46 PM

move the ads to the right and center the text in the middle, its really annoying the way its set up right now.

Comment #97: kelly b  on  05/28  at  05:51 PM

Lookin’ good!  It makes me want to spruce up my netcrib a little.

Comment #98: JoyZeeBoy  on  05/28  at  05:52 PM

Ahsumz!

Comment #99: Gozer  on  05/28  at  05:59 PM

We really do need an RSS feed for the comments as well.

And… and… and… a daily Chris Muir cartoon!

Comment #100: Phoenician in a time of Romans  on  05/28  at  06:13 PM

Dude, there’s no come-ons in here.

Can you get a message to Marc for me?

Comment #101: Auguste  on  05/28  at  06:20 PM

It looks okay in SeaMonkey, and it doesn’t take a long time to load, unlike the previous site.

Just another reason to discard Internet Exploder as a web browser, IMHO.

Comment #102: Dark Avenger and Guardian of 10 Gold Chow Mein  on  05/28  at  06:20 PM

sweet! i love the color scheme. It would be great to have a link to Pam’s House Blend at the top, if she’s interested in putting it up there—i shuttle between her blog and this one whenever she posts or tips off that she’s cross-blogging at “her pad.” I agree about keeping personal info private, putting content in the middle, and moving the brown bar out of the panda’s way. I heart this particular panda.

Comment #103: serena kitt  on  05/28  at  06:27 PM

Just send a photo from the neck down like you did last time, Auguste.

Comment #104: Amanda Marcotte  on  05/28  at  06:32 PM

As long as I can send it direct. Last time he said you never let him have his turn.

Monopolizer.

Comment #105: Auguste  on  05/28  at  06:34 PM

Everything I can come up with is too mean.  *sigh*

Aw, fuck it.

It’s not my fault that no one wants your toilet paper after you’ve used it.

Comment #106: Amanda Marcotte  on  05/28  at  06:40 PM

Looks good, performs badly (yslow score:33). The new software seems quite fast, the actual html is downloaded in 108ms, which is awesome compared to wordpress. Things go to hell with all the js files, a lot of them seem to come from advertising. But the main offender is actually the “share this” link, you seem to have included this script 7 times, and each time the browser wants to refetch it, and takes like 200ms each time. The thing is huge as well, I wonder how necessary the full sharethis js? It would be faster if you just included links.

Things would also be faster if there was only one source for ads, all the different ad js files add a lot of overhead and really slow things down.

Really, the major issue here is that are 60 requests to load the page, which in my opinion is too many, if someone has time I would recommend spriting the css images, seeing if you can get rid of some js and css files, looking for duplicate files (feed.css from blogads and index.php?css are included twice) and consider getting rid of the amazon widget, or maybe look for a smaller one that doesn’t bring in 40k of images (slowly!)

Comment #107: Stephen  on  05/28  at  06:50 PM

Atrios speculates that Jesse is returning.  Not that I object to the present operators of this blog, but I miss Jesse

Comment #108: rea  on  05/28  at  06:58 PM

Only thing I don’t quite like is the font used to headline your categories on the left side bar (members, recently, categories, etc.). I’ve always hated that goofy font. It’s… well, goofy.

Comment #109: roger  on  05/28  at  07:04 PM

Colors, great. New logo, great. Look and feel, great. I actually quite like the boxed comments (and thank you for not going with nested comments, the scourge of the blogosphere).

Like everyone else, I think the main content should be centered between the two sidebars. The layout ought to fit on a maximized browser window at 1024x768 without a horizontal scroll bar, but something is causing it to insist on drawing an unnecessary right-hand border that makes the layout too wide. Comments need to be on a single page and need to have their own RSS feed.

Overall, very nice redesign!

Comment #110: DJA  on  05/28  at  07:07 PM

PS… can we have a “Main” button in between “Next entry” and “Previous entry”?

Comment #111: DJA  on  05/28  at  07:09 PM

The RSS feed has no paragraph breaks, making it difficult to read.  The old feed also had the author of the post at the top after the title, which was a really nice feature.  Could you please add that back in?

Comment #112: EL  on  05/28  at  07:10 PM

PPS… can clicking on the “Comments” button take you to the first comment, as in the days of yore?

Comment #113: DJA  on  05/28  at  07:11 PM

The RSS feed has no paragraph breaks

Not seeing this on my reader (Vienna). Paragraph breaks are fine for me.

The old feed also had the author of the post at the top after the title, which was a really nice feature.

Seconded.

Comment #114: DJA  on  05/28  at  07:16 PM

“We fixed the Terms of Service.  If you sign up, you are permitted to curse your head off in comments.  I promise we will not boot you for profanity.”

Oh goody, how exciting! I am dying to utter my first curse word, but I think I will save it up for a special occasion. This is a really nice design. I liked the old one, too, but you guys have the brown, red and yellow going here, which is very rare. There is not even a national flag for any country in the world to which I can match this color combination! Bravo for innovative, nationless or trans-national Pandagon.

Comment #115: Foucault  on  05/28  at  07:33 PM

Still no confirmation email from registering an account, and no indication anywhere of how to contact the Admin in case of such problem.  he;lp

Comment #116: Cris  on  05/28  at  07:48 PM

I really don’t like how dominated by ads it makes the site seem.  If this design is kept, I’ll probably stop visiting.

Comment #117: m.thop  on  05/28  at  07:50 PM

Love the color scheme, hate having two sidebars on the right. No need to number comments—the name and time work fine as a reference and do get messed up when you have to can the occasional miscreant.

Also, if you have readers still on dialup (not all of us are latte-swilling broadbanders), heed Stephen’s comments; this stuff actually matters but is so easy to ignore unless you’re the one using a steam-powered modem. Then again, ExpressionEngine might not give you much choice.

Comment #118: idlemind, the devil's playpen  on  05/28  at  07:51 PM

OK, your other right. My cryptodexterity strikes again.

Comment #119: idlemind, the devil's playpen  on  05/28  at  07:52 PM

NOW YOU GO FOR THE PANDAS???

When, like, the real animals are being carried out of the earthquake zones in Sichuan province on stretchers???

Hey, why not design your site around cute Chinese human orphans???

They also are very appealing.

Comment #120: wobbly  on  05/28  at  08:21 PM

Personally, I find that having the blog entries on the right side of the screen is really annoying. Centered would be better, and moving to the left side would be best. Looks good otherwise, but since the “Pandagon” title isn’t centered on the screen (at least not my screen), maybe it would be better centered over the entries (especially since the top of the column is curved).

Comment #121: vhakur  on  05/28  at  08:39 PM

Seeing everyone’s names in tiny print after their post instead of large and before it is a bit jarring, but I’ll get used to it.

Permalinks to comments are broken. I use those a lot, so if the coder in charge of that portion of the template could have a look, I’d be much obliged. (All of the anchors are named “#comment_34”, and the links all go to http://pandagon.net/index.php/site/comments/what_do_you_think/#161 and the like, even after the first page.) Also, when fixed, the anchor names shouldn’t begin with a hash (they should read ‘a name=“161”’ or “comment_161” or the like). Also, as they’re invisible, placing them at the top of the comment box is an invisible change… until you go to the link; if the anchor is at the bottom of the comment box, the user’ll have to scroll up to see the linked comment. If you can edit the templates, the anchor should be right after the opening “div class=“comment-body2”” or “div class=“comment-body1” tag.

The preview screen looks quite odd; there are four text-boxes rather than three, all of them with invisible (white-on-white) labels. (The third one is “location”.) Might just be my browser, though. (Epiphany 2.20.1.)

Comment #122: grendelkhan  on  05/28  at  08:57 PM

Congratulations on your new digs!  Very nice new place you got here.

Comment #123: James F. Trumm  on  05/28  at  09:17 PM

I agree with pretty much everyone else.  I don’t care for the content on the right (although I’m sure I’d get used to it eventually) and I’d prefer to have all the comments all on one page instead of multiple pages.  Also, I miss the automatic preview with the comment and the numbered comments.

Otherwise, I think it looks good.

Comment #124: ks  on  05/28  at  09:30 PM

Another vote for content on the left, please!!

Comment #125: mitzi  on  05/28  at  09:31 PM

Congrats on the move, but it still loads slow.  <8^(

(excessively big BG image?  It should be tiny….)

Comment #126: Eric, Rejector of Memes  on  05/28  at  09:32 PM

Having the content on the right makes me discontent. It’s atrocious. Color scheme is pretty bad, too.

Comment #127: Leopold  on  05/28  at  09:35 PM

Looking at it from home, using IE 7.0, it looks a lot better.

Using IE 6.0 on the old site, photograpohs that were partially or totally in a blockquote were hidden by the grey background; using Firefox, they weren’t.  I’m guessing that you have been using a higher version of IE or perhaps using Firefox when you set up the theme, but from the comments above, you’ve got a lot of people still using 6.0.

Even with everything where it should be on my screen, I’ve got to agree with those who find the text on the right harder to read.  It’s just not the natural place for English readers, apparently.

Comment #128: Dana  on  05/28  at  09:48 PM

Oh, and add another vote for all the comments on one page. This is going to be particularly important because right now the comment box shows up on p.1 as well as subsequent pages, and you’re going to have a lot of people getting confused by not reading everything before commenting, freaking out that their comment didn’t appear because they didn’t click through to page whatever, blah blah blah. (I kinda liked the numbers too, because it was a way to keep your place on long threads.) I would hate to see the comment section get barfed up because of user interface issues.

Comment #129: paul  on  05/28  at  09:54 PM

I went ahead and re-registered, and saw, in the Terms of Service:

By registering at this site you agree not to post any messages that are obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, or that violate any laws.  We will permanently ban all users who do so.

Well, at least y’all never banned me from the old site just because some might have thought that comments which disagreed with liberal theology constituted hate speech!  smile

Comment #130: Dana  on  05/28  at  09:59 PM

Expect a new center-aligned design next week.  It should also address the IE6 issues for users on older browsers.

The terms of service have been edited as well.  The comment page limit has been upped to 1,000, which should be enough.

Thanks for the feedback!

Comment #131: Admin  on  05/28  at  10:34 PM

I registered, and I was supposed to get an email to activate my username.  However, I have apparently not gotten this email.

It has saved my username (strangely enough “MikeEss”), but I can’t login without activiation, and I can activate without the email, etc.

Help?  Thanks…

Comment #132: MikeEss  on  05/28  at  10:38 PM

NOW YOU GO FOR THE PANDAS???

Was there some lack of pandas at the last site that I wasn’t aware of?

Comment #133: Auguste  on  05/28  at  10:45 PM

I commented at work, but that seems to have been lost in netspace. However that was before I registered.

At home, using an ancient version of Safari (well, 2.0.4) the formatting works fine. I don’t think it is that weird to have the text to the right, especially because once you read all of even a medium-long post, you are well past the sidebar stuff, leaving only the red and brown bars themselves.

I certainly wish the comments were all one page and not broken up. I wonder if the preview trick they’ve stumbled onto at Slactivist (Typepad, I believe) works here too—there, if you hit “preview”, you get all the comments before on one page. I think this is something Typepad regards as a bug that the Slactivists have made a beloved feature. Well, I’ll try previewing this and see what I get.

Except that this is supposed to be a one-page comments even now, at well over 100.

It would be nice if either there were sub-targets or at least numbers for each comment (at Blogsome I could only see the numbers on certain browsers, anyway, though). But then I’m in the habit of blockquoting prior comments, including poster name and timestamp.

I wonder if that will work here and now though—can we…

Well let’s see:

I would hate to see the comment section get barfed up because of user interface issues.
paul on 05/28 at 08:54 PM

Now on the other hand, at work, I am stuck with whatever version of Exploder my bosses see fit to install. And technically I suppose I shouldn’t look at Pandagon while there, even off the clock on lunch break, but I want to and will until someone tells me to stop.

Or until I get tired of having to highlight the text in order to read it at all. You see, whatever that version is, it not only puts all the main text below the sidebar text, it then runs the text, left against the side like so many of y’all want, over the two dark-colored side stripes.

Also the right stripe looks purple instead of brown, but that’s probably because we line workers use monitors that have been rejected as too defective for customers….

Not a big fan of the dark reddish colors but I do like the beige-tinted text space (when text appears where it is supposed to anyway!) and I suppose red and brown harmonize better with that than the old dark aqua-green. I can adapt.

To close with another test blockquote:

All things are for the best in this, the best of all possible possible worlds.

They lie who say everything is well. They should say, “It is for the best.”

Dr Pangloss, in Voltaire’s Candide

Comment #134: Mark Foxwell  on  05/28  at  11:00 PM

PS re e-mails:

I personally prefer to make my e-mail, rather than my website, public, because I just about never post at, or even visit, there and if anyone is wandering over to my site to contact me I rarely know about it until months later. Whereas I think I am at minimal risk in divulging my e-mail, which I wish more people would write to.

However as far as I have seen yet, no one outside the Pandagon administration actually sees the e-mails of members. What I have found is a convenient means of reaching the people who are regisitered. Using that system would divulge the sender’s email to the intended, registered, recipient, but the sender would not learn the recipient’s address. This seems perfectly fair to me.

And all the hot-linked screen-names I have seen go to their websites, not anyone’s e-mail. I overlooked the possibility of including my webpage address in registration and I am not sure how to edit my profile right now, and so my name appears as plain text.

But anyone, feel free to e-mail me about anything. Y’all can use the Pandagon member list now!

PPS—I didn’t notice any of that weirdness in “preview” either. Maybe I was just being unobservant—it’s bedtime for me now. Or maybe Safari handles it real well.

Have to see what it is like at work I guess.

I just want to stress to those who suggest that the solution to problems with display in Explorer is to ditch the foul thing and use a different browser—well, those of us who like to check in at work are kind of screwed.

Explorer, like Microsoft in general, is just too ubiquitous and too firmly imposed on too many people with no choice in the matter to neglect.

Comment #135: Mark Foxwell  on  05/28  at  11:12 PM

squeeee! i like it, and it loads sooooooooooo much faster for me than the old site did. the ads do distract me when on the left of the main text, but i can cope. the colors are showing up as red, brown and white on my monitor, which reminds me of a striped shirt from the 70s, possibly made of velour, possibly with matching velour pants. i dig it.

Comment #136: jessilikewhoa  on  05/28  at  11:16 PM

I, too, would like the RSS creator/author field to return.

The site looks nice.

Comment #137: Nick Fagerlund  on  05/28  at  11:25 PM

ok, so i registered and played around with the members area and if my thinking muscle is working properly i think i may have a wee bit of an idea what is to come and im effing psyched.

Comment #138: jessilikewhoa  on  05/29  at  12:01 AM

I went ahead and registered under another ID, just to see if it would work for me.

So this will post as coming from Le Main Gauche, but it’s really from MikeEss.  And trust me, nobody wants to use MikeEss except me, so you know I’m telling the truth…

smile

Comment #139: MikeEss  on  05/29  at  12:20 AM

pfffft. maybe I wanted to be MikeEss.

Comment #140: jessilikewhoa  on  05/29  at  12:33 AM

Looks spiff on my Mac (Safari), looks GODAWFUL on my work PC (IE 6.0).  Please fix it so I can get my Pandagon fix at work!

Comment #141: Zil  on  05/29  at  12:36 AM

Yes, in IE6 the black text migrates over the brown bar and is impossible to read.  I switched to Firefox, no problem;  still, those color bars become a waste of about 40% of the screen space as you scroll down.  Will check it out under IE7 on my Vista laptop later on and advise.

Comment #142: Faber  on  05/29  at  12:45 AM

Colors & readability: good
Text pushed to the right: bad
Alternating color comments: good
No comment numbers: bad
New banner graphic: good
New banner font: bad

A mixed bag, but I think my biggest peeve is the text being shoved to the right.

Comment #143: EM  on  05/29  at  12:56 AM

well, i was over at eschaton and i clicked on a link that said “jessie’s back.”  which brought me here.  actually, it DIDN’T bring me here.  it brought me to an utterly blank page, save for the gold-to-yellow color blend thangy.

i still do most of my internet stuff on mozilla for OS X, because i like the composer, “send page,” and integrated mail features, all of which have been discontinued in firefox.  however, mozilla works with fewer and fewer “modern” sites, and this new pandagon layout seems to be the latest casualty.  sigh.

when i pasted the URL into safari, it came up fine.

Comment #144: neal Weiner  on  05/29  at  01:55 AM

no come-ons

Amanda, I’ll be in your neck of the woods starting Friday night, if you’re not too busy in the upcoming week, e-mail me ..............

Fixed

Comment #145: Dark Avenger and Guardian of 10 Gold Chow Mein  on  05/29  at  01:59 AM

You know, an advantage of having the sidebar to the left is that the scroll bar is to the right, so with text to the left as at prior sites, there is a chance that one might accidentally clicka sidebar link.

The old site was so slow to load it would often get jammy, making that sort of mishap more likely.

I also seem to recall that about four moves back, at the time I first discovered Pandagon(late 2005) the comments looked a lot like they do now, each in a separate box.

I certainly like that!

And I like the fonts very much—at least here at home. On my crappy blurry work monitor, maybe not so much. (If I can see text at all over the dark brown sidebar).

But in keeping with my late-night, post-bedtime perkiness—-I also just noticed that, weirdly,here at home at least the posts are doubled—scroll down halfway and the original post repeats, followed by all the comments.

And the encore edition tends to be beyond the dark side stripes—they give out, leaving a clear canvas.

I hope that happens in Explorer too.

Comment #146: Mark Foxwell  on  05/29  at  02:42 AM

Please, please, please change the red & brown stripes! I can’t read text on the brown and can’t see coloured headings on the red at all!

Comment #147: theo  on  05/29  at  06:20 AM

Gonna take awhile to get used to… but I’m half a step up from Luddite. Works fine for moi.

Comment #148: louise  on  05/29  at  07:52 AM

Not a fan of the new design at first glance - somehow, moving the junk from the right of the screen to the left makes everything feel more cluttered, and the color scheme has a distinctly “McDonald’s” feel to it.

I’m sure I’ll come to love it, though.

Comment #149: Alana  on  05/29  at  08:13 AM

jessicalikewhoa, if you’re gonna be MikeEss and he’s gonna be you, I gotta know that in advance so I know which one to be nice to and which one I can be a smartass with! Oh…right… I’m nice and a smartass with BOTH…

“Le Main Gauche?” Cripes, Mike; it’s too damned early to figure out who is who. We all had ASSIGNED SEATING WITH PLACECARDS, and you go and frig it up IMMEDIATELY. Now who gets the salad and who gets the pasta; who asked for medium rare and who wanted the chicken??? Someone get me a damned drink.

Am I still louise? If I can switch, I claim Ms Kate! She’s way cool!! smile

Comment #150: louise  on  05/29  at  08:23 AM

And everyone remember WHERE WE PARKED… not gonna want to waste alot of time looking for your butt later!

Comment #151: louise  on  05/29  at  08:24 AM

Oh, man, I don’t know what y’all did overnight, but the site is worse today on IE 6.0.  Not only are the articles pushed below the lowest items on the sidebars, but they are jammed on the left side, right over the dark red and brown sidebars, and have become completely unreadable!

Comment #152: Dana  on  05/29  at  08:53 AM

“pfffft. maybe I wanted to be MikeEss.”
”“Le Main Gauche?” Cripes, Mike; it’s too damned early to figure out who is who.”

Well, I’m kinda stuck.  Because I requested “MikeEss” but never got the activation email, “MikeEss” is in a sort of limbo.  It exists, but isn’t activated for me to use, and I can’t activate it because I didn’t get the email with the activation code.

I’d prefer to stick with MikeEss because I’m already known (and hated by some) under that name.

I assume Amanda and Co. will be turning on capcha or some such screening tool fairly soon (the spamites never rest).  I can post ad hoc as MikeEss, but until the “limbo” is solved, I can’t register.

What do I do?...

Comment #153: MikeEss  on  05/29  at  09:42 AM

“Oh, man, I don’t know what y’all did overnight, but the site is worse today on IE 6.0.”

Dana, IE6 sucks so bad compared to IE7, at work we basically won’t support the use of IE6 anymore.  And it’s not like IE7 just recently got released or something.  It seems to work fine on any site I’ve ever tried it with, although I prefer Firefox and use it as much as possible.  (The issues you are describing seem very similar to CSS compatibility problems we’ve fought with in IE6 and finally gave up on…)

(Caveat:  I’m currently having a problem playing flash video - like YouTube - in Firefox, which I understand is a widespread problem right now, so I end up having to copy URL’s into IE to watch them.  Kind of a pain but I’m sure it will get fixed soon enough…)

Le Main Gauche, AKA MikeEss

Comment #154: MikeEss  on  05/29  at  10:04 AM

Mr Gauche AKA Mr Ess:  I’ve got IE 7.0 at home, but at work, I’m stuck with what they’ve given me.  But there are plenty of comments above from other people using IE 6.0, so I can’t be the only one.
At any rate, since my previous comment, the main taxt is now to the right again, so someone made an adjustment.  Perhaps this is Pandagon’s beta version?

Comment #155: Dana  on  05/29  at  10:20 AM

That’s weird; I got my activation code right away. Probably darned good thing; I’d be (even more) clueless if it hadn’t processed as to why/what next…

Just bustin’ your chops; you know I luvs ya! No matter what alias you choose.

But if at all possible, I’d rather be to the far LEFT than the far RIGHT… I’m feeling the need to put on a petticoat and walk docilely 3 paces behind my husband. Just sayin’.

Comment #156: louise  on  05/29  at  10:25 AM

Not a fan of the far right text. Its a troublesome orientation for multi-window multi-taskers who may not be using a full screen browsing window. I get why you’d want the shilling column to be to the left of the text, but I think you need to bite the bullet and move the red band over to the right of the article column. It’d make for much more balance visually and usability across different browsing styles.

The top bar is a little spacious and underused right now, too. Not a fan of that panda, but then I’ve not liked any panda since the one with the ball, so its probably just me. I’m getting a human in a panda suit vibe, which considering its clearly from an actual panda photo is kinda disorienting.

That said, love the font use. I have a font that looks a lot like that (could be the same, I haven’t checked) which I love. Works very well here. Like the color scheme, too. Red/Brown is a very attractive combo but also underused so it’ll be pretty signature for your site until people start stealing it. I hope the archives can come back, but I think this makes for a nice orderly transition of branding.

Comment #157: BStu  on  05/29  at  10:39 AM

IE6 should be at least readable now.

Comment #158: Admin  on  05/29  at  10:55 AM

Like the new look.  Very clear and easy to read (and the pandas pic on the post is dangerously stressing my kawaiimeter).

Comment #159: Walt  on  05/29  at  10:59 AM

Nice new look! One complaint: Since I don’t read all posters equally, I don’t like having to scroll to the bottom of a post to learn who wrote it.

Comment #160: Kevin  on  05/29  at  12:59 PM

Checkjed again with IE 6.0, and ieverything is situated properly now.

Comment #161: Dana  on  05/29  at  01:14 PM

I think the site looks great! My only complaint is that who the post’s author is doesn’t show up through the rss feed.  Maybe they would if the names were at the top of the posts instead of the bottoms?

Comment #162: jinny  on  05/29  at  01:20 PM

Read a few of the comments, but don’t have time to go through them all.  Apologies in advance if this has been brought up.

I frequenly use my Dash (a “just before the iPhone” phone) to read Pandagon, and I suspect it’s the brown and red columns on the left that are really screwing things up when I try to read it now.  I saw some suggestions to put the content between them, but I suspect putting the content on the left (well, physically on the left) and both bars on the right will correct the readability issues.

Also, no more autopreview?  Crap.

Comment #163: NY Expat  on  05/29  at  02:02 PM

I come for the content, not the design, and I’m sorry to say the new format renders the content somewhat less readable to me—I guess because it puts the content to the right of the other stuff.

Red and brown: Do not want.

But that’s just one liberal’s experience.

.

Comment #164: MFA  on  05/29  at  02:07 PM

I prefer the minimalist look of the old blog. Also, the text pushed to the right is annoying. Why not go to the L column-text-R column format? I understand the 2 L columns if it increases ad revenue, but it is annoying.

Comment #165: NancyP  on  05/29  at  02:17 PM

Hmmm…  Mao red with poop brown.  I guess that’s appropriate.

Comment #166: Lucky Larry  on  05/29  at  03:42 PM

Whatever you did in the last 24 hours, it made it even worse. Now the content starts way down the page, intead of at the top, and the illegible text overlaps not only with the brown strip (making all black text illegible) but also with the red stripe (making the links and headlines illegible).

I’ll keep checking back periodically to see if you’ve fixed the cross-browser issues. I’m bummed that I haven’t been able to read the blog for the past few days… :(

Comment #167: Picador  on  05/29  at  03:59 PM

FWIW: I’m running IE 6.0.2900.2180

Comment #168: Picador  on  05/29  at  04:00 PM

This is just a comment to get my info into the new site. Ok, I can’t leave it there: they have taken away the Queen’s beautician in Nepal!

Comment #169: JohnL  on  05/29  at  04:03 PM

Ah. I should have checked this earlier: the problem goes away if I turn off my content filter.

Since I assume many of your readers run Adblock for Firefox, Symantec ad-blocking, or similar, you should probably address this bug. It should be solved easily enough: just mandate a minimum width for the “Shilling” column, possibly by inserting a placeholder image or div tag or what have you.

Comment #170: Picador  on  05/29  at  04:05 PM

Sorry for the multiple comments, but:

Now that I can see the site, I like it but for one detail: having the author’s names at the bottoms of posts is disorienting, as one has to read through the whole story before finding out who’s writing it. This is often fine, but often not, as the writer’s personal context often gets cited in the first few sentences and it often means something quite different depending on who’s writing.

Comment #171: Picador  on  05/29  at  04:13 PM

I would suggest adding alt text on the link-images in the top banner (netrootsnation, barackobama etc.) so we know what they are for. 

I miss the Panda sitting in the Pandagon.  But the new panda is good, too.

The color scheme and fonts are very seventies.  It seems to hang together.  I don’t have a positive or negative reaction to it other than that.  Having both bars on the left is a little annoying but won’t make me not visit the site as I usually read on a wide enough screen. 

Probably you have little or no control over it, but that Showtime Tudors ad is unpleasantly rape/murder-y.

I never could see the comment numbers before, on IE7 or IE6, so I don’t miss them.  They sound nice, though.

Comment #172: oldfeminist  on  05/29  at  04:13 PM

Frankly, you blog looks like shit, but hey, so is the content. Are you going to do a post on how Obama likes to get his blow jobs. Maybe you could sell some knee pads for all the obama worshipers for when they service him - and since your ilk is rife with lesbians, my guess is you need to make michelle knee pads too, though it’s more than likely that slothful, bitter affirmative action freak has a dick too.

Note: This message is calibrated to the sensibilities of the recipients.

Comment #173: zbree  on  05/29  at  04:44 PM

the stylesheet doesn’t work in Opera for some reason. :(

Comment #174: Mighty Ponygirl  on  05/29  at  05:19 PM

Woink, now it does. this is mystery beer indeed…

Comment #175: Mighty Ponygirl  on  05/29  at  05:21 PM

I’m using Google Reader to read Pandagon through RSS.  The paragraph breaks are better now than yesterday, but I still don’t see the author in the feed.  Also, the content cuts off at the more tag.  The feed used to contain the entire post, and I would love to have that back.  I doubt that I would click through to read each post in its entirety but I usually do when the post is in the feed.

Comment #176: Erica  on  05/29  at  05:46 PM

Whatever this layout looks like in a normal browser, it looks and works great in elinks. So, congratulations.

Comment #177: Djur  on  05/29  at  08:44 PM

am i the only one who noticed you can send little private messages in the members area ala social networking? now we can snark behind the trolls’ backs. i’m obsessed with the new pandagon.

Comment #178: jessilikewhoa  on  05/29  at  09:50 PM

I can login now as MikeEss.  Thank you, oh great and powerful gods of bloggy goodness…

Now if I can just figure out why I still sometimes get that domain name parking page when I go to Pandagon…

Comment #179: MikeEss  on  05/29  at  11:45 PM

Please, please put the content back in the middle between the two sidebars - the far right orientation is a total pain to use at my work and is only defensible as a way to drive more attention to ads.

Other than that, it looks ok.

Comment #180: Peter  on  05/30  at  12:21 AM

Just to clarify, for those who missed the earlier message, a new center-aligned design is, in fact, on its way.

Comment #181: Auguste  on  05/30  at  05:07 AM

Hey, the “title” tag isn’t being set correctly in your template. On individual page views, it ought to show up the name of the individual article as well as the site name. You’ll lose a lot of search engine pulling power if you don’t set that up.

I’m doing a bit of research into Expression Engine at the moment myself, and I think it’s a good choice for where you want to take the site.

I like the typography of the logo, but I think something more hand-illustrated would be better for the panda. Content area typography feels a bit undercooked though.

Comment #182: Nick Caldwell  on  05/30  at  09:27 PM

Like several others, I read the site through the feeds (often on my phone).  The current feed just has the front-page content; that is, not the whole article, which means seeing the whole thing requires you to click through, which is a pain.

It would be great to have a couple of feed options, including a full-text feed, the brief feed, and maybe comment feeds.

Comment #183: Claire  on  05/30  at  11:20 PM

I’ve also just noticed the graphical labels on the sidebar content modules don’t have any kind of text equivalent, making them unusable for vision-impaired people with screen reader software.

They’re also don’t have quite the right background colour to blend into the column’s background colour.

Oh god oh god oh god font tags. Jeebus. Can I redesign your site for you?

Comment #184: Nick Caldwell  on  05/30  at  11:28 PM

come ons?
does the mean I am given permission to finally ask Amanda out for a cup of coffee?

Comment #185: Derek  on  06/01  at  04:14 AM

I add my voice to the “not too pleased about the content being shoved to the right” chorus.
glad to know (according to Auguste) that it’s about to the middle.

Comment #186: kat  on  06/01  at  02:05 PM

*move to the middle* that is….

Comment #187: kat  on  06/01  at  02:07 PM

I used the comment numbers/links a lot to keep my place in the comments page when refreshing to see new comments, and now when I click on a time in a comment, the URL implies that I’m at that comment, but it sends me back to the top. Can this be fixed? Am I doing something wrong? This link, for example, sends me to the top of that post, not to comment 641. I’m in Firefox 2.0.0.14.

Comment #188: cantabridgian poet  on  06/02  at  11:53 AM

Just to clarify, for those who missed the earlier message, a new center-aligned design is, in fact, on its way.

I see that I have no need to comment here.
Like the color scheme, though.

Comment #189: Theaetetus  on  06/02  at  04:23 PM

Anyone have any ideas as to why the new site isn’t showing up at all for me in Firefox (v.1.0.7)? I’ve since checked and can access it via IE but in Firefox I don’t get ads or anything, just a plain background of that yellow-y type colour.  I sure don’t want to have to browse Pandagon in IE.

Comment #190: Hekie  on  06/02  at  09:43 PM

1.0.7 is a pretty old version of Firefox. I’d suggest upgrading for security reasons alone. But I’m not sure its renderer is bad enough to prevent the display of an entire page.

Comment #191: Nick Caldwell  on  06/02  at  09:58 PM

Thanks Nick.  Will give it a go when I have time.  Very frustrating to see the pages of Pandagon posts go up and knowing I’m getting so behind!

Comment #192: Hekie  on  06/04  at  04:24 AM

The new RSS feed is a pretty serious downgrade from the old site.
First off, the RSS feed doesn’t tell you who wrote which article.

Also, there’s the problem that the link that’s in the RSS feed doesn’t take you to the page with the full article and comments, but just to a page that has only the portion you just read.


Compare the new feed:
http://www.google.com/reader/view/#stream/feed/http://pandagon.net/index.php/site/rss_2.0/

to the old one:
http://www.google.com/reader/view/#stream/feed/http://pandagon.net/feed/

(Those links are to how it shows up in google reader)

While we’re on that, I really, really liked that the old pandagon feed had full articles in it.  (That feministe doesn’t is one of the reasons I don’t read them as much)  With many interesting things I would click through to the full thing to get the comments anyway, but I tend to read on the train without net access or in places where net access is ungodly slow.

Comment #193: Daniel Martin  on  06/05  at  11:36 AM

No one gossips about other people’s secret virtues., tramadol, tramadol,  780, cheap cialis, cheap cialis,  =OO, buy phentermine, buy phentermine,  174, phentermine no prescription, phentermine no prescription,  730131, buy cialis, buy cialis,  840683, cheap tramadol, cheap tramadol,  hrrb,

Comment #194: DesMoines  on  06/11  at  07:02 PM

I’m hoping this thread is still being checked.  If not I may post this OT in another thread.

The upgrade of Firefox took care of not being able to see Pandagon (although it sucks in every other way, grumble grumble.  I’m liking the new design. 

One thing that’d make the new set up work much better for me would be to have the name of the person posting at the top rather than the bottom of the post.  I open multiple links at one time to catch up on Pandagon and I prefer to know who I’m reading when I start (at the mo’ I’m having to scroll to the bottom of the post then back to the top if I want to know the writer).  It was better previously with the name at the top, especially now that there’s another writer on board.

Comment #195: Hekie  on  06/12  at  01:15 AM

hi, you have super site.
<a > lesbian </a><a > lesbian </a><a > lesbian </a><a > lesbian </a><a > lesbian </a><a > lesbian </a><a > lesbian </a><a > lesbian </a><a > lesbian </a>
lesbian lesbian lesbian lesbian lesbian lesbian lesbian

Comment #196: Demetris  on  06/16  at  07:35 AM

thanks you peopels.
<a >Best Link</a><a >Maps</a><a >Interesting Pages</a><a >Interesting Pages</a>
Maps Best Links Maps Links Interesting Pages

Comment #197: Nikolaos  on  06/16  at  07:35 AM

Exciting website. Thank you.
<a > baby </a><a > boy </a><a > free </a><a > baby </a><a > baby </a><a > baby </a><a > free </a><a > free </a><a > baby </a><a > names </a>
baby baby baby names boy names names baby free

Comment #198: Kris  on  06/16  at  07:37 AM

I found it very interesting.
<a > lesbian </a><a > lesbian </a><a > lesbian </a><a > lesbian </a><a > lesbian </a><a > lesbian </a>
lesbian lesbian lesbian lesbian lesbian lesbian lesbian lesbian lesbian

Comment #199: Adonis  on  06/16  at  09:32 PM

hi, you have super site.
<a > free </a><a > baby </a><a > baby </a><a > names </a><a > free </a><a > baby </a><a > baby </a>
of baby baby baby boy baby baby boy

Comment #200: Charalambos  on  06/16  at  09:33 PM

Exciting website. Thank you.
<a > free </a><a > names </a><a > free </a><a > free </a><a > names </a><a > baby </a>
baby baby baby baby baby baby baby free baby

Comment #201: Andreou  on  06/16  at  09:34 PM

good! support!
<a >Maps</a><a >Links</a><a >Interesting Pages</a><a >Links</a><a >Maps</a>
Interesting Pages Best Links Links Maps

Comment #202: Kris  on  06/16  at  09:35 PM

I don’t know if this is still being checked, but I don’t want to hijack another thread. I don’t think I’m saying anything particularly new, this stuff is still very problematic for me.

I read Pandagon most through Google’s RSS reader. There’s still no author on the feed at all and that’s a big problem. It should be at the top both on the site and on the feed because it completely alters my perception of an article when I know who is writing.

Also I really want the feed to show the entire article. Right now you only see things above the cut and there’s no indication that cut is there at all (there’s no “read more…” or anything). If I click to go to the article I get taken to a page that is still cut and I have to click *again* to read the whole thing and I have to click *again* if I want to read to comments. This is bullshit. If I am interested enough to visit the page outside of the reader I want the whole thing *and* the comments without any additional clicks.

These usability issues are huge for me and I know for other people as well. Please fix them.

Comment #203: ElleDee  on  06/17  at  10:42 AM

I agree with everyone who wants author information in the feed.

Also, I don’t know if anyone else had this problem, but the New Site post did not appear on my old feed, so it took me a long long time to notice the switch.  Probably at this point everyone’s figured it out anyway, but it might be possible that some people haven’t who have lots of stuff on their RSS reader and don’t notice much when one doesn’t post.

Comment #204: hecateluna  on  06/18  at  01:10 AM

http://freeiq.com/howardstephen adipex
<a >adipex</a>
[url=http://freeiq.com/howardstephen]
adipex[/url]

Comment #205: freeiq  on  06/23  at  05:38 PM

5veaqO http://freeiq.com/howardstephen Adipex
http://freeiq.com/howardstephen Adipex Online
http://freeiq.com/howardstephen Phentermine Adipex

Comment #206: dfdsdfcedf  on  06/24  at  02:04 PM

kOLoIo lhbbnpiigszh, vbmopsqiwoqc, [link=http://mjxjuutsvyrt.com/]mjxjuutsvyrt[/link], http://ymihaeasfzur.com/

Comment #207: ecuznadvo  on  06/25  at  10:55 AM

A49e1F nfbqnlppqllt, tfnihdfscxhj, [link=http://qnvjkbxvbugv.com/]qnvjkbxvbugv[/link], http://rxgpsxuersec.com/

Comment #208: monivuwzpp  on  06/26  at  06:24 AM

http://buyhomefree.com/

Comment #209: olga  on  06/30  at  04:08 PM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.