Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: The change I want to see is funnier liberals and less wingnut whining Previous entry: Who’s your daddy?  Apparently, McCain/Palin

When will McCain/Palin finally choose to end the politics of hate?

I’m not holding my breath in these last desperate weeks waiting for an end to it, but Brave New Films and The Color of Change are calling for McCain/Palin to condemn the hate and fearmongering being perpetrated by those angry mobs of supporters. They stoked the fires and now we see this:

We’d like to talk about the pressing issues facing our country: the woeful economy, rising unemployment, the housing crisis, and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. But we can’t talk about them because John McCain and Sarah Palin have distracted us with the politics of hate and fear.

Instead of discussing the real issues plaguing Americans, McCain and Palin have turned to fear-mongering and race-baiting, stoking the prejudices of their supporters. The situation has become so critical that we’ve teamed up with Color of Change to put an end to these dangerous mob scenes.

Things have gotten so out of control that some conservatives have come forward to denounce McCain and Palin’s hate-mongering. In an Op-Ed for The Baltimore Sun, Frank Schaeffer writes: “John McCain: If your campaign does not stop equating Sen. Barack Obama with terrorism, questioning his patriotism and portraying Mr. Obama as “not one of us,” I accuse you of deliberately feeding the most unhinged elements of our society the red meat of hate, and therefore of potentially instigating violence.”

Don’t let McCain and Palin undo the decades spent fighting for civil rights and equality in our country.

Even Russ Feingold, linked as partners in campaign finance reform legislation. with McCain, can no longer stand by in silence while the bigot mobs continue erupting with McCain/Palin alternating between stoking them and ignoring them. (via email):

“In a closely fought campaign like the Presidential race, elements of either side can get caught up in the emotions of the contest.  This is especially true during stressful economic times.  I heard Senator McCain help tamp down the rhetoric at a recent town hall meeting.

Regrettably, he needs to do more of that.  An energetically waged campaign can all too easily slip over into something hateful and dangerous, and everyone from the candidate on down needs to do whatever it takes to stop that.  It won’t seem credible for the John McCain I know to say his campaign should be respectful, while seeming to look the other way as his campaign employs certain tactics and rhetoric which apparently are intended to appeal to the fears of some Americans.”

I like that he made the point that McCain has changed - he’s not the man he knew back in the day. That’s an understatement.

The open letter from Color of Change and Brave New Films to the McCain/Palin campaign is below the fold.

Dear Senator McCain and Governor Palin,

Time and again in America, people of all races and backgrounds have overcome division and fear, and come together to uplift the country and create a more equal and just society. It’s part of what makes this country great.

With an African-American nominee running on a major party ticket and a woman on the Republican ticket for the first time in history, this campaign has seen Americans—men and women of all races—inspired to continue that great tradition, coming together to bridge the gaps that history has set between us in service of our national progress.

But let us be clear: while we have made great strides in this country when it comes to racial equality, we are not finished. Now, more than ever, we need leadership that understands that we live in complex times where too many are quick to judge another by the complexion of their skin or the sound of their name.

In the last few weeks, Senator McCain and Governor Palin, rhetoric at your campaign events has taken an increasingly dangerous tone that seems to ignore the precarious state of our progress when it comes to race and ethnicity.

Supporters at your rallies and other events have used hateful language and called for violence against Sen. Obama yelling “kill him!” “off with his head!” and “bomb Obama.”

For the most part, you have stood by in silence. In addition, you have also repeatedly made statements that somehow connect Senator Obama with terrorism. Your surrogates have emphasized his middle name. This is problematic and dangerous, and we believe helps create the conditions that have given rise to these incidents of violent rhetoric from some of your supporters.

Today, we’re standing together as Americans of all political persuasions to express our deep concern that the decisions of your campaign are contributing to a dangerous atmosphere of paranoia, division, and hate that, as we have already seen, has the potential to seriously harm our country and its progress.

Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. said, “The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and convenience, but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy.”

In these trying times, candidates seeking the highest offices in the land must call on the best in each of us, and call off the worst.

We urge you to join people of conscience from all races and backgrounds to reject the politics of division and fear, and come together to uplift the country and create a more equal and just society.

 

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Pam Spaulding on 05:03 PM • (23) Comments

Brave New Films is unabashedly anti-McCain and The Color of Change appears pro-Obama, so are their concerns evidence of worry that negative attack ads may be effective?  There certainly has been pressure from the ultra-right on McCain to go more negative in light of the polls showing a widening gap between him and Obama.  I’ve read some conservative blogs who say that McCain really doesn’t want to win because he has not been willing to go as negative as they would like.  They just love Bible Spice, though.  The mobs are becoming enough of a story that I’m anxious to see what tack McCain will take at the debate. 

Obama needs a concise explanation for Ayres in the debate. I’m certain it will come up; it’s too juicy for McCain to pass up, raising the spectre of Ayres bombiing buildings while McCain was in prison.  I would suppose Obama has a concise response.

Comment #1: MiddleageLiberal  on  10/14  at  05:42 PM

Obama needs a concise explanation for Ayres in the debate.

Ayers received millions of dollars to fund his projects from the Annennberg Foundation. One of the founders is one of your supports, Senator McCain. WHY ARE YOU ACCEPTING THE SUPPORT OF PEOPLE WHO FUND TERRORISTS, SENATOR MCCAIN?

Comment #2: gwangung  on  10/14  at  06:39 PM

I’m amazed how promptly the general rule that the Republicans are fulminating about the Democrats doing something that the Republicans are themselves doing is coming true in this election.

Seriously, the head of McCain’s transition team was a lobbying for Saddam Hussein after the first Gulf War and we’re supposed to worry about Obama becoming friends with a college professor 30 years after his radical days?

Comment #3: Mnemosyne  on  10/14  at  06:40 PM

Geez ... I don’ts type English too good sometimes.  :-(

Comment #4: Mnemosyne  on  10/14  at  06:44 PM

Brave New Films is unabashedly anti-McCain and The Color of Change appears pro-Obama, so are their concerns evidence of worry that negative attack ads may be effective?

It’s fair to say that Brave New Films is a liberal org (and .: tends pro-Dem/anti-GOP,as you note). And most liberals would object to the Palin mob, McCain’s proxies and their nasty attacks for the same reasons Feingold hints at: pandering to racial and religious bigotry during bad economic times is a dangerous practise, historically speaking. That basic fact transcends day-to-day party politics, at least for the reality-based community.

The Republican party and various neoCon and Know-Nothing pundits take a different view, of course: the myopic “next quarter” view familiar to anyone who’s worked with an MBA-trained manager, doped up atheletes or Saudi oil sheiks. They see the tactic as an effective one, but given the power of the “trusted” Internet when it comes to challenging outright lies (stronger, I’d argue, than the power to spread them), they’ll likely lose at least one moderate voter for every two Know-Nothings whose votes are shored up.

So the goal here is straightforward: get McCain to make an unequivocal statement that racism is a by-product of ignorance and stupidity. In the short-term, that will publically insult a large part of the Palin mob to the degree that they’ll stay home on election day. In the long term, it’s the right and obvious thing for a responsible American politician to say. All of which means McCain will do everything he can to avoid “straight talk” on the issue.

As for Ayres, goodness knows Obama’s staff has been provided with a large enough selection of concise responses by the liberal and progressive blogosphere. As long as he resists the temptation to get too fancy (e.g. discussing the misconduct and incompetence of COINTELPRO, which led to Ayres walking free), Obama should easily slough off the guilt by association tactics promulgated by the GOP. And if McCain persists, I’m sure Obama can place him (as well as his running mate) in rooms with some very unsavoury characters over the years.

Here’s my suggestion for a response that would take less than a minute:

“Putting aside the ridiculous suggestion that an 8-year-old could have any meaningful political interaction with Robert Ayres ... the fact is that, as adults, politics and public service have placed BOTH Senator McCain and I in situations where we had to deal with people whose views we *strongly* opposed ... people who don’t always have the American people’s peace and prosperity at heart. I’m sure Senator McCain could name some in his past—I sure can.”

And if McCain failed recognise the implied threat in that statement and laugh along knowingly, he’d deserve exactly what he’d get in Obama’s prepared follow-up.

Comment #5: Gracchus  on  10/14  at  06:58 PM

I would suppose Obama has a concise response.

McCain served alongside Strom Thurmond in the Senate, who had a history of supporting segregation and even ran for president on a pro-segregation platform. How can we trust McCain, given his segregationist associations?

But I think Obama is going to go for the “McCain hired a pro-Saddam Hussein lobbyist” angle. Seriously, as Gracchus pointed out, McCain must know that there’s a perceived threat in Obama’s “say it to my face” threat. McCain’s choice is between losing with dignity, hopefully with at least 200 electoral votes, facing a humiliating defeat. Ultimately, I think McCain knows this and is going to go for the “losing with dignity” path and not take Obama’s bait at the debate.

Comment #6: Tyro  on  10/14  at  07:07 PM

Ayers received millions of dollars to fund his projects from the Annennberg Foundation. One of the founders is one of your supports, Senator McCain. WHY ARE YOU ACCEPTING THE SUPPORT OF PEOPLE WHO FUND TERRORISTS, SENATOR MCCAIN?

I wouldn’t be the least bit surprised if Obama doesn’t have this in his holster come tomorrow night.  But, at the same time, I suspect McCain is going to pussy out on pulling the Ayers trigger.  It’s not getting him any steam as an underground meme.  McCain won’t win any support if he flings it at Obama directly.  It’ll just be more publicly debunked and McCain will look that much sillier for advancing it.

This is such a lose / lose for him, I’m almost embarrassed to keep watching.  But I’ve just got too much popcorn on hand…  How much did Obama win by in Illinios?  75 / 25?  85 / 15?  Nice to know that wasn’t a stroke of good luck.

Comment #7: Zifnab25  on  10/14  at  07:22 PM

The interesting thing is that although McCain may finally come to accept losing with some shred of dignity, Palin has no reason to accpet that, in fact doing so is far worse for her nascent political career than going out pandering to the basest elements of the GOP.  I suspect that there will be a fairly obvious schism between McCain and Palin in the next few weeks during which Palin will “take off the gloves” depsite anythig that the McCain campaign might say to the contrary.  She needs to distance herself from McCain’s defeat perhaps more than any other Republican politician in the country, and the bext way for her to do so is to get inceasingly ugly.  She has far more to lose at this point in her career than McCain does.

Comment #8: Jason  on  10/14  at  07:50 PM

I like that he made the point that McCain has changed - he’s not the man he knew back in the day. That’s an understatement.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The Republican Party isn’t what it was back in the day.  Fear is all they have now.

Do you remember when the Republucans were really good at money, oil and precision violence?

I’m 45 and I remember proud Republicans. 

I remember that they could at least make the rich richer instead of making EVERYONE poor.

I remember that before the godbots dominated the party and started putting the End of Days/Rapture agenda in place, our policies in the Mideast were crooked enough to leave us ass-deep in cheap oil - I liked that.

Remember how they could liberate Granada or the Faulklands in 72 hours - whether they wanted it or not?  Remember our invasion of Panama when we went in for 36 hours and scooped up Noriega?  Remember how Iran set the American hostages free on Reagan’s inauguration day KNOWING that Reagan Republicans were hostile, violent, and a little “irrational”?

Seriously, Republicans used to be able to do stuff.  Perform tasks.  Produce SOMETHING.  Display competence.  Now they just seem to be pointless and lost.  Fear IS all they have left.

Comment #9: Beast  on  10/14  at  08:05 PM

Laura,

we’re still praying for you smile

Comment #10: JS  on  10/14  at  08:17 PM

The GOP with neocons and religious crusaders does not even have support for limited government to unite it as a party anymore, so hate of another and tearing down ideas labeled Liberal or Elitist is all that works.

Comment #11: Luke  on  10/14  at  09:18 PM

Seriously, Republicans used to be able to do stuff.  Perform tasks.  Produce SOMETHING.  Display competence.  Now they just seem to be pointless and lost.  Fear IS all they have left.

I want to know when incompetence became a point of pride for Republicans, to the point where it seemed perfectly rational for them to hire a bunch of 20-something interns from the Heritage Foundation to run the rebuilding effort in Iraq rather than people who actually knew what they were doing.

Comment #12: Mnemosyne  on  10/14  at  09:36 PM

Laura,

we’re still praying for you

JS on 10/14 at 07:17 PM
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Don’t bother, Jilldo.

I noticed that anti-choice hatemonger Bob Enyart’s favorite radical lackey, Nathan Sheets, “went back to the gay lifestyle.”  I know he was a favorite of yours.  Maybe you could send him to the “Dr. Dobson Homo No ‘Mo Camp” that you claimed had “cured” Ted Haggard.

http://www.jillstanek.com/archives/2008/10/nathan.html#comments

Comment #13: Beast  on  10/14  at  09:44 PM

??? You mean: that was for reals?  ::flabbergasted::

Comment #14: Eric, Rejector of Memez  on  10/14  at  10:28 PM

When will McCain/Palin finally choose to end the politics of hate?

Well, it wasn’t today in Scranton (incidentally, this speech was playing on Fox in the next exam room while I was at the dentist. Fun).

That performance artist gets around!

Comment #15: annejumps  on  10/14  at  10:30 PM

Help stop the hate - here are three things you can do to make a difference right now:

1. Sign the petition to end incitement of hatred and violence by McCain/Palin.

2. Write your Congressperson about it.

3. Write a letter to the editor of your local paper.

And spread the word!

Comment #16: ac  on  10/14  at  11:21 PM

“I want to know when incompetence became a point of pride for Republicans”

It all started when the flat earthers, conspiracy nuts, the whole Christian lunatic fringe headed by Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell bought the Republican party. The Republican party made a deal with the devil and became butt buddies with people who thought intelligance, competance were hallmarks of Satanism.

The Republican party may very well self destruct. It’s been walking dead for awhile but the Republicans didn’t notice it till now . The anger displayed by the gop base now is just one of the five stages of grief.

Comment #17: tootiredoftheright  on  10/15  at  02:20 AM

Hate is all they have left, and I am afraid it may be enough.

This election is it. Everybody’s all in and here comes the river. If McCain’s elected we will be torn apart inside and emerge weaker. Our empire will be disbanded forcably in a way that benefits either us or our subjects. If Obama is elected we will still be torn apart inside, but at least some semblance of the rule of law will remain and our empire will last long enough to be peacably disbanded over the next few decades.

Comment #18: Bacopa  on  10/15  at  03:37 AM

tootiredoftheright,  could you please just not use the expression “butt buddies” like that? “Bedfellows” is an old expression with the same implication of too much political intimacy, which doesn’t carry the sense of homophobia your original choice did. Or one could use a nonsexual metaphor: “The Republican Party let the morning glories of fundamentalism into their garden, only to find they strangle the corn of moderation.”

Comment #19: Samantha Vimes  on  10/15  at  06:34 AM

The hate needs to stop on both sides. The Right needs to stop appealing to racists in order to win elections. The Right also needs to stop labeling everyone “anti-American” or accusing them of not supporting the troops simply because they want out of Iraq. At the same time the Left needs to stop calling anyone who dares to disagree with them in anyway a racist, sexist or being homophobic. They need to stop their own hate of anyone who dares to have any serious religious beliefs. I have seen name calling on both sides of the fence and both the Left and the Right use the name calling as a scare tactic.  Even on this thread you have posters using terms such as “pussy out” and “butt buddies.” I think we all need to tone it down.

Comment #20: DWill  on  10/15  at  11:52 AM

“an old expression with the same implication of too much political intimacy, which doesn’t carry the sense of homophobia your original choice did.”

How is it homophobia? There is a reason why there is no shock and surprise when GOPers and religious right men get caught in homosexual relationships especially when they have a history of being anti-gay.

They have both political and physical intimacy going on in secret while denying it since they loathe themselves.

Comment #21: tootiredoftheright  on  10/15  at  04:55 PM

DWill wrote:

They need to stop their own hate of anyone who dares to have any serious religious beliefs.

Even though I can only speak for myself, I call BS. I am so very tired of hearing this statement being passed off as truth. 

I have a more elaborate explanation on my blog, since my original comment got WAY too long. It’s under my name on LJ, if anyone cares to look.

Comment #22: maatnofret  on  10/15  at  05:06 PM

I call BS, too, and just add that there are many Liberals whose religious beliefs in their view compel them to left-wing positions. Also, Liberals´ calling for religion to be private is not animosity towards religion but making sure religious norms do not get imposed on people and influence public policy. It is simply asking of religious conservatives the same courtesy for other people, to practice their own beliefs - not that religious conservatives have much inclination to extend that courtesy, given their belief in a god scandalized by others´ private behavior and the imperative to save others´ souls from so-called error.

Comment #23: Luke  on  10/15  at  06:00 PM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.