Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: Buttars: Gays ‘greatest threat to America’ Previous entry: The New York Post makes its case for a post-racial America

Where All The Cool People Are Not At

I’m not going to say there’s anything racist about conservatives mocking a homeless black woman who’s trying as hard as she can to get a home for herself and her family in troubled economic times, but oh my fucking god there is. 

Henrietti Hughes famously stood up at a recent Obama rally, describing her family’s desperate search for a home that wasn’t a car, talking about the years-long waiting lists at the housing authority, telling of her family’s need for something as simple as a home.  She didn’t ask Obama to build her a house, she didn’t ask to stay over in the Lincoln Bedroom, she simply talked about a basic human need that she was having a terrible time fulfilling because of the economic downturn.

Ergo, it makes sense for conservative to mock the hell out of her as if she’s one of Reagan’s curler-haired, Cadillac-driving welfare queens.

An example below:

Bonus points for not working in the middle of the day and misspelling “taxpayer” as “taxpaier”, which lends real credence to the point that people without jobs need to start learning and stop wasting our time.

It’s really, really easy to run an effective campaign of resentment against the poor when the economy is expanding or seen as expanding; it’s incredibly difficult to run the same campaign when people’s fears of becoming poor are heightened.  Mocking those in peril when peril may be right around the corner is simply asinine and petty (well, more asinine and petty than normal), like the dick - and next victim - in a horror movie who mockingly tells the frightened ingenue that she’s just imagining the gutted corpse she saw in the elevator. 

Movement conservatives don’t seem to get that the deep and abiding ethos of moral superiority they profess is inherently situational.  Everyone wants to be a winner, and it’s much easier to convince people that the impoverished are losers when they see themselves becoming winners.  Fear of losing leads to the realization that safety nets and aid are necessary in order to keep us all from becoming losers, and that in and of itself makes it much harder to laugh at the nice old black lady who wants a roof that doesn’t have a dome light on it.

I have to believe that at this point, the Republican Party has simply given up all hope at winning, and is instead content to use all of the mechanisms and appearances of an organized political movement to just hang out and have shitty parties until they’re put out of their misery. 

 

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Jesse Taylor on 07:40 PM • (38) Comments

Only rich people call them Benz.

Comment #1: Magis  on  02/18  at  08:29 PM

Magis, you’re expecting too much from people who can’t spell takspa- ... taskpaea- ... oh, forget it.

My father will sneak a random Rush / Hannity talking point in the middle of a seemingly normal conversation.  The last one went something like “Yeah, your mother’s making pot roast for dinnerOMG PEOPLE WHO DON’T WORK ARE GETTING TAX REFUNDS FROM NOMABAand then we’re going out for ice cream ...  say hi to the kitties ...”

... which got me wondering.  A lot of the talking points start off with some grain of truth.  What’s this one?  I keep hearing from my less than intellectually rigorous associates about tax refunds for people who don’t work, but I can’t find anything not-crazy about it.

Comment #2: Joshua  on  02/18  at  08:34 PM

I don’t get it. What’s an expensive car got to do with a plea for modest shelter to meet one of humanity’s basic needs? Oh, wait. It’s like when Coulter retorted to the life-threatened Iraqi troops complaining about lack of armor or something VITAL like that that they whine when their hair gets mussed. Dismiss the legitimate request by comparing it to something frivolous. Thus home = Mercedes Benz; minimal life-saving equipment = pampering. Cute trick. Too bad it doesn’t work.

Comment #3: daphne  on  02/18  at  08:43 PM

Not Iraqi troops, obviously. American Troops IN Iraq, or Afghanistan or anywhere for that matter.

Comment #4: daphne  on  02/18  at  08:45 PM

“associates about tax refunds for people who don’t work”

It comes from the mistaken belief that people who make the poverty scale but still work have no taxes to pay. Of course the people in poverty still pay taxes, payroll social security, taxes on what they buy such as food unless you are on food stamps then you still gotta pay sales tax on everything else.

Bush Jrs little rebate checks btw went to people who didn’t work. The Bush admin sent a check to everyone with an active social security number.

Comment #5: tootiredoftheright  on  02/18  at  08:45 PM

...the Republican Party has simply given up all hope at winning, and is instead content to use all of the mechanisms and appearances of an organized political movement to just hang out and have shitty parties until they’re put out of their misery.

Well someone has to drink all those white wine spritzers.

Comment #6: keshmeshi  on  02/18  at  09:00 PM

I would like to point out that all their haircuts fell out of the eighties.  I imagine this is some sort of subliminal support for Ronald Regan.

Comment #7: Zifnab  on  02/18  at  09:05 PM

While it’s true that many low wage workers don’t pay income taxes (it’s already been pointed out that they pay all kinds of other taxes) and even get some money back in the form of EITC, it’s important to remember that all these “tax breaks” the poor get are effectively a subsidy to their employers, not them.  Wally World knows it can get away with paying crap subsistence (barely) wages because the Gummint will kick the poor schlubs who work there a few hundred bucks every year.

Comment #8: DonnaDiva  on  02/18  at  09:07 PM

Bush Jrs little rebate checks btw went to people who didn’t work. The Bush admin sent a check to everyone with an active social security number.

Worth noting that the original Stimulus rebate check plan was a Pelosi-Bush invention.  The GOP was pushing hard for a 10% reduction in corporate tax and a further downsizing of the capital gains.  Also worth noting what didn’t make it in - unemployment benefit extension and food stamp increases.  :-p

Comment #9: Zifnab  on  02/18  at  09:08 PM

Reich wingers make a fetish out of not understanding.  They believe that if they don’t understand something (someone else’s misery, someone else’s point of view, how to spell and read simply words) it puts them in a rocket seat towards automatic transcendence of mundane reality.

Comment #10: scratchy888  on  02/18  at  09:11 PM

It’s stupidly callous to be mocking people as lazy because they lack a job at a time when millions of people are being laid off.  Do these morons really think they’re gonna get any good press over this?  People are scared that they’ll soon have no means to feed and shelter their families; they’re not concerned about the twisted morality that would only allow more tax-cuts to the wealthy when it’s not the wealthy staring down the real possibility of being homeless.

I hope these Repuke assholes continue to protest for the idea that the dirty, undeserving, lazy, shiftless poor should just shut up and start yanking those bootstraps.  If Obama can’t magically fix the economy before his term’s up, do you think people will turn to the party who’s entire philosophy is “Fuck the poor, you obviously just didn’t want it enough so you deserve what you got”?

On the other hand, people might just be too busy trying to sell the pencils in their cups to bother voting.

Comment #11: Jrod  on  02/18  at  09:11 PM

“Bush Jrs little rebate checks btw went to people who didn’t work. The Bush admin sent a check to everyone with an active social security number.”...well that’s different…

***

There really is some segment of our sick American citizenry who really likes knowing there are Americans out there living under freeway overpasses, etc.  Somehow this validates them as “successful” individuals, because they have somebody “unsuccessful” against which to contrast themselves.

How did the American Experiment deteriorate so far?  How do these people (the overwhelming majority of whom are nominal “Christians” — and we all know what their holy book says about the poor) justify ignoring everything they know to be moral and right to shit on people who’ve already been shit on by life?

Sometimes being an American is a disgusting experience…

Comment #12: MikeEss  on  02/18  at  09:12 PM

I suppose “non-taxpaiers” receiving tax refunds could refer to the Earned Income Tax Credit, which sometimes results in a refund.  But only people who work are eligible, and only if they earn low wages.

Comment #13: themmases  on  02/18  at  09:17 PM

Wow, that is just pathetic - not to mention a perfect example of morons with too much free time on their hands.

Comment #14: CHV  on  02/18  at  09:26 PM

“it puts them in a rocket seat towards automatic transcendence of mundane reality. “

Remember: As long as you’re totally unsympathetic and hateful towards everyone else’s problems, they can never happen to you.

Comment #15: Dan  on  02/18  at  09:26 PM

How did the American Experiment deteriorate so far?  How do these people (the overwhelming majority of whom are nominal “Christians” — and we all know what their holy book says about the poor) justify ignoring everything they know to be moral and right to shit on people who’ve already been shit on by life?

Deteriorate?  Are you kidding?  150 years ago, you could buy a guy on the auction block like he was a stick of bubble gum.  50 years ago, dragging a gay man to death from the back of your car would get you a parade, the key to the city, and free muffins for life.  Two months ago, it was perfectly legal to discriminate between men’s and women’s salaries if you could avoid getting caught for the first 180 days.

Deteriorate?  Are you kidding?  We’re making nothing but progress.  If the world still looks like it sucks, that’s only because we’ve got such a long way to go.

Comment #16: Zifnab  on  02/18  at  09:30 PM

I have to believe that at this point, the Republican Party has simply given up all hope at winning, and is instead content to use all of the mechanisms and appearances of an organized political movement to just hang out and have shitty parties until they’re put out of their misery.

No, that’s not it—their raison d’etre now is simply to make the Dems fail (as if they needed any help). They just don’t care if the country fails with them—in fact, a strong argument could be made that they want the country to fail (see The Shock Doctrine and The Wrecking Crew).

Comment #17: Geocrackr  on  02/18  at  09:30 PM

”...not to mention a perfect example of morons with too much free time on their hands.”

...in their case, “morans” is probably more correct…

Comment #18: MikeEss  on  02/18  at  09:33 PM

When I filed my takes last week I found out that I am one of these terrible social leaches that is entitled to more of a refund than what I paid (by like 110 bucks, but still).  I made about 20,000 in taxable income and paid about 2000 dollars in taxes.  I ended up getting slightly more than 2000 back because of credits for money spent on education and contributed to 401k while supporting a family of two on that income.  I seriously want one of these assholes to tell me to my face that I don’t deserve that tiny extra boost and the two bags of groceries I will use it to buy.

Comment #19: GumbyAnne  on  02/18  at  09:37 PM

“Deteriorate?  Are you kidding?”

Zifnab, you’re right, but it just seems like we move a foot forward and then slide back 11 inches.

And of course the dichotomy between what The Founding Fathers said and what they did is gargantuan…and we inherited this spirit of hypocrisy as an American birthright…

Comment #20: MikeEss  on  02/18  at  09:41 PM

What’s this one?  I keep hearing from my less than intellectually rigorous associates about tax refunds for people who don’t work, but I can’t find anything not-crazy about it.

That’s because it is crazy.  Basically, the current meme is that if you don’t pay actual honest-to-God income taxes—as in, taxes over and above the $100,000 payroll tax cut-off —you don’t really pay federal taxes at all and any tax refund you get is a welfare payment from the government, not a return of your own money.

No, seriously.  That’s the argument.  That’s why you keep hearing people say that only 40 percent of taxpayers pay income tax at all—because it’s the people who make more than $100,000 in salary and/or people who live off investments.

So if you make less than $100,000 a year, congratulations—the Republicans now consider you a welfare queen.  Where’s my Cadillac?

Comment #21: Mnemosyne  on  02/18  at  10:08 PM

So the Republicans are making derogratory remarks about 80% of their voting block without the 80% realizing it.

Comment #22: tootiredoftheright  on  02/18  at  10:39 PM

I’m surprised no one’s calling this lady and others like her Lucky Duckies, a la the Wall Street Journal.

Comment #23: Bitter Scribe  on  02/18  at  10:58 PM

The republicans have the same problem as so many other special-interest organizations when their pet issue isn’t on the agenda: they have to find something for their adherents to do so they won’t lose interest and drift away to more salubrious pursuits, like shooting pool.

Comment #24: paul  on  02/18  at  11:17 PM

The people who get tax refunds without paying any taxes live on the same planet as the poor people who, due to evil socialized medicine, can’t choose their own doctors, or the welfare queens driving their Cadillacs to the food stamp office, or the builders of the NAFTA Superhighway from Canada to Mexico, or the thousands of American servicemen still held in Vietnamese POW camps, or….

Comment #25: Dr. Psycho  on  02/18  at  11:47 PM

You do realize that the wife of a republican congress person heard that lady’s plea for a home and set her up with a currently unsalable house of hers that she didn’t want to be vacant.

http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/02/12/henrietta.hughes/

Comment #26: Ms Kate  on  02/18  at  11:59 PM

http://blogs.tampabay.com/buzz/2009/02/rep-nick-thomps.html

The inevitable fall out from somebody who dares live their christian values.

Comment #27: Ms Kate  on  02/19  at  12:04 AM

OMG PEOPLE WHO DON’T WORK ARE GETTING TAX REFUNDS FROM NOMABA

Could this be any dumber?

1.  People who don’t have any income have no tax liability.

2.  People who make very, very little have no tax liability, either—when I made +/- $10K a year working in a bookstore, I got a nice fat refund every year.  It was Teh Ahsum.  This probably applies to people on unemployment (unemployment income is taxable), possibly also people whose unemployment ran out sometime in 2008.

3.  People who have a tax burden, make less than a certain amount, and fulfill a few other criteria automatically get a tax credit called the Earned Income Tax Credit. 

All of this has been happening at least ever since I’ve had to do taxes, so definitely is not an Obama thing.

Comment #28: The Opoponax  on  02/19  at  12:35 AM

I’m still trying to sort out the sign that says “Stimulate Economy The Tax People.”

Comment #29: Cris  on  02/19  at  02:10 AM

It says Stimulate Economy, Tax the People. The “the” was added late.

Comment #30: The Erl  on  02/19  at  03:00 AM

I have an idea that would solve all of our federal budgetary problems.

Get rid of the income tax, and simply have the government confiscate the assets of anyone who claims that poor people are just sucking off the public teat. Let them try it out for themselves, so they can see how great poverty really is.

Comment #31: Dan, Grand High Emperor of Bananas Foster  on  02/19  at  04:20 AM

I’m sure it factors in there somewhere, that the Republican interpretation of the entire event is that Ms. Hughes was an audience plant and that the entire thing was a PR stunt.

Comment #32: Pietoro  on  02/19  at  06:23 AM

I’m guessing that these people are unaware that many of the largest corporations in the US (a) pay no taxes, and (b) actually receive tax rebates, not to mention various other forms of state subsidy.

Comment #33: Dunc  on  02/19  at  08:49 AM

Of course that a Republican gave the woman the house to run since it couldn’t be sold also doesn’t seem to be acknowledged by other Republicans. Also the woman was just telling her situation not requesting a house.

Comment #34: tootiredoftheright  on  02/19  at  10:04 AM

The some Republican politician’s wife gave this lady and her family a place to live is pretty in line with their silly view of the world. Charity gives psychological benefits to the giver that paying taxes to pay for a social safety net doesn’t.

And you can make sure that you aren’t giving charity to any undesirables.

Comment #35: witless chum  on  02/19  at  10:48 AM

Poor people should just inherit money and then they wouldn’t be poor.  If they can’t work hard enough to end up with rich parents, then they should have a dozen kids so some TV channel will support them.

Comment #36: bananacat  on  02/19  at  12:33 PM

The joke used to be, “A Democrat is a Republican who’s never been mugged.”  Now it’s looking like, “A Republican is a Democrat who’s never been unemployed.”

Comment #37: cynickal  on  02/19  at  04:23 PM

All these Cadillac references…  You know, used Cadillacs more than 10 years old are dirt cheap and have been since I was a kid.  Watch out for oil leaks on the Northstar engines, though.  The lower case seals are a notorious pita to fix.
/gearhead

Or did you all mean Lexus, but you didn’t know?
/Snoop

Comment #38: Chocolate Covered Cotton  on  02/19  at  06:09 PM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.