Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: This Is What It Sounds Like When Doves Spit On Your Grave Previous entry: Shooting the messenger

Whistleblower: McCain used Senate staff to tamper with the DEA to cover up Cindy’s drug abuse/theft

CrimeRepublicans

Holy crap. This is red meat folks, and it’s tied to the person at the top of the GOP ticket—this is huge. Stories about Cindy McCain’s abuse of and theft of prescription drugs from her charity in the 90s has been well-documented, but many of the scandalous details have not been discussed by the national media.

Well, that bit of silence in this case has come to an end. A whistleblower has gone on the record about John McCain’s use of his Senate staff and resources to sweep the matter of his wife’s illegal actions under the rug. Now we’re talking about the people’s business. (via Open Left):

Today, Tom Gosinski, her former employee and a close friend of the McCain’s, came out on the record about the entire sordid episode.  And it appears that McCain used his Senate staff and resources to cover up Cindy’s drug use, and potentially to prevent the Drug Enforcement Agency from investigating his wife’s theft of illegal prescription drugs.  John McCain certainly used his political connections to begin a campaign of intimidation against Gosinski, because at the time - this was after the Keating 5 scandal - another major scandal would have derailed his career.  Gosinski stayed quiet out of fear until today; a recent fight with cancer has strengthened his resolve.  As he told me today, if he can beat cancer, he can go on the record regarding how the McCain’s do business.

We need an investigation into what happened here.  What did McCain know about the investigation of his wife and did he use his power as a Senator to help her abuse drugs or avoid prosecution?  When he was one of a hundred Senators, it was of minor importance.  And now?  Well it would be nice to know if the next President is engaged in behavior more characteristic of an influence peddling mob boss than an upright politician.Gosinski was an employee of Cindy McCain who helped her run her charity, the American Voluntary Medical Team (AVMT) in the early to mid-1990s.  At the time Gosinski worked for her, Cindy McCain was addicted to prescription painkillers, taking between 30-50 pills a day of Vicatem and/or Percocet.  She had doctors writing out prescriptions in other peoples’ names, including Gosinski.  When Gosinski found one of the prescription slips, he got angry, and Cindy had him fired.  This part of the story is just kind of sad, but not damning; Cindy McCain was a lonely and bored wife who turned to drugs in place of what was a loveless marriage full of fundraisers and in all likelihood, various infidelities (or so were the rumors Gosinski heard at the time). 

Now, it begins to get dangerous and vicious after Gosinksi was fired.  At first the McCain’s said they’d help him find a job, but it became clear to Gosinksi that McCain was using his political connections to blackball him from another job in Republican politics in Arizona.  So he sued the McCain’s for wrongful termination, and went to the Drug Enforcement Agency to find out the legal repercussions of having prescriptions for painkillers written in his name.  To retaliate, McCain then had his political ally, Rick Romley, open an extortion investigation against Gosinksi.  In the course of that investigation, it was revealed that the DEA was circling around Cindy McCain and her charity.  It’s not clear what they were investigating her for, but it is clear she was bringing illegal prescription drugs around the world on a diplomatic passport secured for her by McCain’s Senate office.

McCain’s Senate staff and Senate resources were intimately involved in Cindy’s work with the charity.  John McCain procured her a diplomatic passport, which meant that her bags were not searched by customs, and Mark Salter and Torie Clarke were both coordinating with Gosinski on logistics for the trips abroad.

And there’s much more, so click over. So how is the McCain campaign going to try to weasel out from under this? There are too many landmines in this story that will result in questions Straight Talk McCain will have to answer.  There should be a Congressional investigation into this, given the gravity of the situation and the questions raised about the abuse of power. What does this thuggery say about how McCain will behave in the White House? How many other people may be persecuted with our taxpayer dollars under his orders?

If there’s one thing that the McCain camp wants to avoid is anything that deviates from the milked-to-death image of John McCain as the “Maverick” and patriotic POW, and neither of those labels applies to the insider, backstabbing, petty man using his power to destroy someone to protect his reputation and image because of his drug-addled wife’s “little problem” that was about to break wide open. This is The Real McCain, and it’s time for voters to see this image before they go to the polls.

This story needs to be driven hard - is this the kind of change McCain/Palin plan to bring to Washington? He looks an awful lot like the long list of corrupt GOP officials we’ve been dealing with since Cindy was popping pills back in the day.

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Pam Spaulding on 10:56 AM • (38) Comments

Looks like the rethugs are the party of codependence.  This speaks to fitness to lead and govern, and I hope that the Obama campaign doesn’t play nice with McCain here.

This isn’t about Cindy ... they can complain that it is, but that may not wash even with some hard core churchy folk.  This is about enabling an addition and covering it up in an active fashion. 

Makes me wonder how many of these pills went down McCain’s throat.

Comment #1: Ms Kate  on  09/11  at  11:19 AM

addiction, not addition.  Sorry.  I think it all adds up, though.

Comment #2: Ms Kate  on  09/11  at  11:21 AM

Pam, I agree that this account, which looks prettily sold, shows a “maverick” who is just another guy who breaks the rules when it’s his benefit.

And if this story involved anyone but Cindy, it might take wing and be very effective at showing his true character. But above and beyond the media either ignoring or incompletely presenting the story, as is their way, a good chunk of the public will see this as a verboten attack on Cindy, especially as the GOP whine turbines start up. Many moderates would look at any mention of her past drug use as an attack on a wife, mother and philanthropist whose addiction is far in the past, and would excuse McCain’s actions as those of a loving husband who may have made a tiny error, but hey, it was for his wife, so it was understandable. Americans love redemption stories. They love “mavericks”. They love people who protect their families, especially men protecting wives.

Yes, I know, the story isn’t about Cindy, but that’s what most people will see it as. And the Obama campaign has said repeatedly that families are off limits, and would be hung by its own petard if it stepped anywhere near this one.

This is a solid story that could be valuable to the campaign, but it’s simply unusable now. There are several fronts the campaign can pursue without fear of blowback from moderates. But he can’t afford to do anything with this stuff, especially after the GOP has shown no shame about the lipstick and pig comments and has trotted out that vile wolves commercial. Here in liberal Toronto, in a country that largely favours Obama, I’ve heard moderates say that Palin is a really awesome woman who has been treated unfairly. I have also heard people say that they think the lipstick comment was a deliberate attack on Palin.

The GOP is trying to frame Obama as a man who bullies women. He can’t do anything to reinforce that frame among otherwise moderate and reasonable people. He has to ignore this story and continue campaigning hard in other areas. And if the media goes after it on his part, they will get most of the blowback, but Obama will get hit, too.

Comment #3: MaryL  on  09/11  at  11:37 AM

(Ack! Remove “on his part” from the last sentence. Editing error.)

Comment #4: MaryL  on  09/11  at  11:39 AM

You do realize that Torie Clarke wrote a book called “Lipstick on a Pig”.

Comment #5: Ms Kate  on  09/11  at  11:40 AM

McCain-Palin: Using the power of public office to punish their personal enemies.

McCain: Investigating the man who blew the whistle on his addict-wife’s charity drug thefts for extortion.
Palin: Trying to get her sister’s ex-husband fired from the State Troopers

Comment #6: Hector B.  on  09/11  at  11:48 AM

Yes, I know, the story isn’t about Cindy, but that’s what most people will see it as. And the Obama campaign has said repeatedly that families are off limits, and would be hung by its own petard if it stepped anywhere near this one.

The Obama camp doesn’t have to hone in on this, but the blogosphere can. And besides, we’re not talking about shoplifting a candy bar; these are serious criminal acts that put Cindy McCain on the DEA’s radar. That McCain abused his power is a character issue—who else will he “protect” or destroy in this manner.

I believe this will resonate with people who see, yet again, the wealthy and powerful have different rules that don’t apply to the average Jane and Joe, and he attempted to bend whatever rules on the taxpayer’s dime. It strikes right at the McCain “maverick” , straight talk and POW branding they’ve so carefully crafted, and any questions raised because of his intervention on this matter as a Senator is fair game for the press.

Whether the press does its job is out of our control—at least we have a whistleblower who is willing to give details that John McCain will have to respond to.

Comment #7: Pam Spaulding  on  09/11  at  11:50 AM

This is why he loves Sarah Palin so much—they’re the same person.  They use their power to exact petty revenge.

This story will not have legs, even though it should.  The media will treat it as attacking a wife and a recovered drug addict.  Just like with Limbaugh, IOKIYAR, you sinned, begged forgiveness, and are all shiny new now.

Plus, there’s no corresponding drug dependency or power abuse on the Obamas’ side, so how can the MSM present a ‘balanced’ report if all the “bad” news is only on one side of the contest?  To be “fair” they have to say something about Obama as well, even though the “Fairness Act” no longer exists.  If they can’t slam Michelle Obama, then they can’t slam Cindy McCain.

Yes, even though the issue is John McCain’s abuse of power, the Republicans will say it’s an attack on Cindy and the MSM will agree.  Even those who understand that McCain is guilty of corruption will say it happened a long time ago, and McCain isn’t really corrupt, he was just defending his pretty wife in a mavericky way.

Comment #8: Caren-Sun-blocking Creator of Animorphic Pancakes  on  09/11  at  11:52 AM

Keep attacking those women.

Working great for you so far.

The smell of desperation is in the air.

Wise up - talk about the Republican POLICIES for the past 8 years
and what they’ve done with our military and economy.  Yes, your
base and independents want to hear that. 

Or you could give Biden the boot, and re-up HIllary.  That would
[probably make the difference.

Comment #9: Libertarian  on  09/11  at  11:53 AM

So how is the McCain campaign going to try to weasel out from under this?

They’re going to say it’s a private family matter that’s in the past, and that Democrats are assholes for bringing Cindy’s addiction up.  Then they’ll put Cindy on CNN, MSNBC and Fox News to talk bravely about her battle with addiction and how her loving husband stood beside her and helped her fight it and how it strengthened their marriage, blah blah blah.

It is, unfortunately, the exact kind of story that’s easy to turn back on the Democrats and make them look like jerks for bringing it up.  I know the problem is the abuse of power, but the drug addiction is the sexy part of the story and it’s what our lovely press will focus on.

If we had a real press that was interested in actual issues, it might be a winner to look at how McCain has abused power in the past.  With our tabloid press, though, it will just turn into a dozen cover stories on US and People and OK! with headlines like “Cindy’s Brave Battle With Addiction—She Tells All!”

Comment #10: Mnemosyne  on  09/11  at  11:56 AM

Wise up - talk about the Republican POLICIES for the past 8 years
and what they’ve done with our military and economy.  Yes, your
base and independents want to hear that.

And when Obama does talk about policies and points out that McCain’s policies are the same as Bush’s in new clothes, you drop onto your fainting couch because he said “lipstick on a pig” and bruised your iddle feewings.

Please.  You think we don’t know how the game is played by now?

Comment #11: Mnemosyne  on  09/11  at  11:59 AM

How about the policy of no mercy for anyone caught with drugs, unless said person is Cindy or Rush.

Look, this is doubly damning because it looks like he was feeding her habit so any admission to rehab wouldn’t stall HIS career.  He was then faced with covering her ass and her trail because that would have resulted in scandal if she was arrested. 

He did this for himself and his career, not for her.  Had he given a shit, he’d have shuffled her off to rehab long before she got a diplomatic passport.

Comment #12: Ms Kate  on  09/11  at  12:03 PM

a good chunk of the public will see this as a verboten attack on Cindy

Which is patently ridiculous, since the Republicans were perfectly happy to go ahead and investigate the Whitewater scandal, which involved both Bill and Hillary Clinton.  I don’t remember them being particularly worried back then about the importance of preserving the privacy of the First Lady, who is after all not an elected official.

Comment #13: The Opoponax  on  09/11  at  12:06 PM

Hm. Pam, I think you misunderstand the dynamic here. When someone uses his connections in the government to protect a lawbreaking family member, voters think, “That’s awesome. I wish I could do that.”

I think it’s an interesting story, sure, but you are overstating the case when you claim that this is “huge.” We live in an era where Americans and the media have lost their collective capacity for outrage about misuse of government resources and abuse of power. In a certain way, I think a lot of Americans sort of respect it.

Comment #14: Tyro  on  09/11  at  12:16 PM

The press will ignore it because it’s from the “crazy leftist bloggers.” McCain won’t have to answer any questions about it.

Comment #15: dwhite10701  on  09/11  at  12:31 PM

Tyro’s right. This is the country where dirt-poor Walmart clerks vote to be ass-raped by their multimillionaire overlords because they just *know* that someday, THEY TOO will be multimillionaire overlords.

They will **never** strip the wealthy and powerful of their corruption, because they hope someday to indulge in it themselves.

Comment #16: Well, what?  on  09/11  at  12:33 PM

Wise up - talk about the Republican POLICIES for the past 8 years
and what they’ve done with our military and economy.  Yes, your
base and independents want to hear that.

What the hell do you think Obama’s been talking about all this time?

Comment #17: Joshua  on  09/11  at  12:36 PM

What the hell do you think Obama’s been talking about all this time?

mumblemumbledunnomumble**neveractuallyheardhimspeak**igetallmynewsfrommeganmccardle….

Comment #18: Well, what?  on  09/11  at  12:37 PM

Yeah, I agree—it won’t get any play in the media, partly because they’ll be able to define it as an “attack on a family member,” which is always forbidden until the day the press finds some dirt on Michelle Obama or Jill Biden, and partly because it makes St. McCain look like the corrupt ass he truly is. You don’t want any reporters to lose their access to McCain’s bitchen barbecues, do you?!

Comment #19: Scott  on  09/11  at  12:43 PM

I don’t know what everyone else thinks but drugs plus cover-up still equals front-page scandal.  Its just a matter of how much legs this story has.

Comment #20: Doug H. (Fausto no more)  on  09/11  at  12:45 PM

Librals pickin’ on my women! Strong man here to protect them.  I think you all should OH LOOK something shiny!

Comment #21: Libertard  on  09/11  at  12:58 PM

Cue the smearing of Gosinski (who may be somewhat immune because of his recent cancer making him a sympathetic figure, but not for long) in 5…4…3…2…

Comment #22: zadig  on  09/11  at  01:02 PM

Hurricane Ike is bearing down on Houston. I predict any talk of this will get lost in the wall-to-wall storm coverage. Hell, McCain-Palin might dump a few more things during landfall (remember Bristol’s predicament was announced as Gustav came ashore).

Comment #23: dirtgirl  on  09/11  at  01:18 PM

Hurricane Ike is bearing down on Houston.

That’s because God is mad about Republican lying.

Comment #24: Ms Kate  on  09/11  at  01:22 PM

The National Enquirer just broke another Palin scandal, if y’all are interested.  It seems Track has had a few problems with drugs, too.  And they’re alleging that the Palins threw Bristol out of the house when they found out she was pregnant. 

http://www.nationalenquirer.com/_palin_family_shockers_what_sarahs_really_hiding/celebrity/65407 

I just love Republican “family” values.  Lying, cheating, abuse of power, drug abuse, drug smuggling, theft, cover ups, and pre-marital sex. 

What kind of dirt do these folks have on Obama?  Oh yeah, they don’t like his church.  Whatever.

Comment #25: BadKitty  on  09/11  at  01:23 PM

(ARGH! That should have been “hoist by their own petard”. I have no idea who is packing what in the Obama campaign.)

But, yeah, this story needed exposure years ago. Too bad the media laid down and died on this one. In this current climate, I predict:

What bloggers say: [cogent summary of the case and what it shows about McCain’s history, judgment and character]
What the public hears: BLAH BLAH BLAH Cindy McCain BLAH BLAH BLAH McCain BLAH BLAH BLAH maverick maverick maverick BLAH BLAH BLAH Obama evil wolfish bully of women BLAH

Comment #26: MaryL  on  09/11  at  01:24 PM

I thought Troopergate would have more leg by now, but that has had little if any effect on otherwise decided voters. Americans had become well inured to government scandals by the early 19th century.

Comment #27: jed  on  09/11  at  01:49 PM

OK nmem (how you pronounce that?) I’ll amend.

Talk about the issues AND avoid calling the female VP pick of your adverasary a pig.

Generally, this initial burst will wear out. Then, if BO talks about the issues he should
win.  I admit that he and BIden should not make some stupid remark EVERY SINGLE
DAY.

Hey, maybe I’m wrong, I think the way Obama is going about this is wrong.  He got
where he is by stressing issues and change from what the Rep’s did.  If he continues
that, without the stupid remarks and attacks, he’ll win.  Why on God’s earth is he
acting as a hit man anyway?

For a party with almost all the issues going their way, he is sure trying hard to blow it.

Comment #28: Libertarian  on  09/11  at  01:53 PM

Okay ... they want a referendum on Image?  Game on!

Comment #29: Ms Kate  on  09/11  at  02:17 PM

Hey, now wait a minute. Shouldn’t you all be glad McCain’s wife allegedly abused drugs? It’s a vaguely hipster thing to do, yes?

Comment #30: Sugar Ray Republican  on  09/11  at  02:32 PM

Talk about the issues AND avoid calling the female VP pick of your adversary a pig.

He was talking about issues.  In fact, he was telling people that dressing up the same old Bush policies (the pig) under a label of change (the lipstick) was bullshit, and he was calling McCain out on it.

It’s a damned shame, though, that the GOP has no substantive response other than whining about their hurt feelings.  Maybe they should take some of Palin’s advice when she was talking about Hillary Clinton and grow up a little.

Comment #31: Joshua  on  09/11  at  02:34 PM

Talk about the issues AND avoid calling the female VP pick of your adversary a pig.

Oh, well then I guess it’s a good thing that HE ALREADY DID THAT, YOU TWIT.

The only thing Obama even **remotely** called a “pig” was a POLICY (not a person, a POLICY) proposed by MCCAIN (remember him? The dude who’s ACTUALLY RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT?)

Jesus fuckin H Christ on a solid-gold pogo stick. You people get much dumber, you won’t know how to breathe anymore.

Comment #32: Well, what?  on  09/11  at  02:42 PM

Of course Sugar Ray thinks this is about Cindy abusing drugs.  He already wants to use CELEBRITY bullshit to distract from THE ISSUE that SENATOR MCSAME abused his OFFICIAL STANDING and interfered with federal investigators.

Comment #33: Ms Kate  on  09/11  at  02:49 PM

Talk about the issues AND avoid calling the female VP pick of your adverasary a pig.

Good thing Obama’s already doing that, then.  What, you actually believed the Republican spin that he called Palin a pig?  Geez, even CNN didn’t fall for that one, and Wolf Blitzer is one of the most gullible journalists ever.

Comment #34: Mnemosyne  on  09/11  at  03:37 PM

I was just talking to a friend of mine about this and she replied “I don’t see the big deal. It happened a long time ago.”  WTF?  Granted I’m almost a decade older than she is and the 1990s seem a long time ago to her, but he abused his power as a public official and you don’t think that has any bearing on what kind of president he will be?

I suspect that her reaction (she is not a McCain supporter, BTW) will be the typical one.  As much as I want a story like this to gain traction, people are going to dismiss it.

Comment #35: history_mom  on  09/11  at  04:43 PM

McCain’s pulling of strings to keep the lid on a DEA investigation of his wife is exactly the type of thing that will not resonate in the media echo chamber.

Not because it isn’t true, but because it does not fit in with the official narrative of McCain as wise warrior. Palin is getting the same sort of kid gloves treatment for the same reason. The media both profits from the horse race narrative as well as will be there for the cover-up of the coming election theft.

Follow the money.

Comment #36: LanceThruster  on  09/11  at  05:35 PM

This story isn’t even remotely new, never mind the bogus claim that, “Gosinski stayed quiet out of fear until today.”  Tom Gosinski went on the record about this in 1994 (http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/1994-09-08/news/opiate-for-the-mrs/). And I’m sorry, but do you really want to put your faith in an article written by somebody who wrote “Vicatem” instead of Vicodin?

Comment #37: JustBeingPedantic  on  09/11  at  05:48 PM

What JustBeingPedantic said. Seems like new stuff from an old, discredited source. More stuff is at the bottom of this article:

http://www.azcentral.com/news/specials/mccain/articles/0301mccainbio-chapter8.html

Comment #38: Tom  on  09/11  at  06:34 PM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.