Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: The Worst Thing You Can Say To A Person In America Previous entry: Why Obama did the right thing

Why birtherism matters

HistoryRace

As I expected, I was chastised in comments by a drive-by commenter who claimed paying attention to this birther thing is a waste of time, because important things are going on. It was the "ignore it and it'll go away" argument in another form, and I was happy at least that it seems so far only one person is trying to pull it.  Nonetheless, I think it's important to understand that this is about way more than a bunch of conservatives getting a crackpot idea in their head.  For that reason, I recommend watching Baratunde Thurston's video on what has transpired.

Like I said yesterday, one of the things that has happened is that Obama, by forcing this issue, has stripped the plausible deniability away from birthers that they are "just asking questions".  The fact that they're not satisfied as they claimed they would be demonstrates that this was never about a legitimate concern about his citizenship, but that they were groping around for a way to say that they will never accept black Americans as full Americans.  That Trump immediately switched to questioning Obama's education is telling, and if anything, it's more stark than questioning his birth certificate in demonstrating the racism of this whole fiasco.  This is because when Donald Trump talks, you get a strong feeling he has to pay someone to wipe his ass for him, because he's too stupid to figure it out for himself.  For him---a man stupid enough to claim that the right to privacy has nothing to do with abortion, a man who probably thinks that combover looks good---to suggest that Barack Obama isn't smart is pure, unadulterated racism. Baratunde is right to compare this birther thing to literacy tests and other Jim Crow laws that prevented black people from voting.  (And which Republicans are bringing back in places like Kansas and Florida.)  No matter what the cursory justifications for this are, the underlying reason for these kinds of "tests" on black Americans is to say over and over again that the people issuing the "tests" and demanding the "proof" don't agree that black Americans are American. And, in the case of Arizona with their "papers, please" law, saying that Hispanic Americans aren't American.  Or, as Sarah Palin puts it, Real Americans.

This right wing obsession with trying to kick large segments of our population out of the category Real Americans has immediate effects on the people being discriminated against, and it has effects far beyond that.  I'd argue that this culture war is why our country's screwed in so many ways.  Culture war got Bush into office, where he promptly started two unwinnable wars to bankrupt the country.  Culture war is why our Supreme Court nominations are so contentious, and why the court is now far to the right and cheerfully ripping up the legal rights of anyone who isn't a billionaire or a corporation.  it's why our economy is going down the drain, because large segments of the population are more concerned about making sure people they don't like don't get a piece of the pie that they are willing to stand by while a handful of rich people take it all from all of us.  The line-drawing of who is and isn't a Real American is complicated, but the biggest, most consistent aspect of it has been racism against black Americans.

The culture wars really got started with the battle over civil rights.  That's how domestic terrorism was born.  That's how Bible-thumping as a cover for reactionary politics was developed.  That's how Jerry Falwell got his start, as a segregationist.  That's how the modern Republican party formed, in response to federal laws banning discrimination and harassing voters at the polls.  There's a tendency in our country to pretend we've put all that behind us, but as the birther movement shows, that isn't so.  I'm not saying that progress hasn't been made, of course, but these culture wars over identity still shape our politics in disgusting ways.  The people who voted for Richard Nixon are still around, and they vote in larger numbers than the rest of the population, and so they and their Real American obsessions have an outsized influence on  this country. 

That's why I don't think the proper response to birtherism is to look away or minimize what's going on, because it makes everyone deeply uncomfortable. Culture warriors and racists benefit if everyone politely pretends they're not as vile as they are, and Trump is just the latest example of this.  Confrontation is how you fight this kind of bigoted bullshit. People who promote it are the lowest of the low, and people who coddle it should not get away with it.

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Amanda Marcotte on 08:50 AM • (20) Comments

... a drive-by commenter who claimed paying attention to this birther thing is a waste of time, because important things are going on. It was the “ignore it and it’ll go away” argument in another form ...

I will never stop pointing out that the Serious, Reasonable People were saying this in 1993 about Rush Limbaugh: Ignore him, and he’ll dry up from his own ridiculousness.

Not so much.

Comment #1: RickMassimo  on  04/28  at  10:13 AM

It was the “ignore it and it’ll go away” argument in another form, and I was happy at least that it seems so far only one person is trying to pull it.

That strategy didn’t work in Germany in the 1930s, and judging by the number of Teabagging morons America in 2011 isn’t all that exceptional.

You don’t give into bullies and blackmailers on the petty and ridiculous stuff because they’ll only take it as a sign that you’re a prime mark and escalate. And guess what: most intelligent people can deal with both the petty stuff and the important stuff simultaneously.

Not sure why this is so difficult to understand. And it’s not like the petty stuff isn’t easily addressed. Watch this:

That Trump immediately switched to questioning Obama’s education is telling, and if anything, it’s more stark than questioning his birth certificate in demonstrating the racism of this whole fiasco.

Especially since, in talking about Obama’s educational career, Trump could have been more accurately characterising that of his silver-spoon son-in-law.

See? And that’s courtesy of Gawker.com, not the NYT (which, I’ll admit, is part of the reason people have difficulty understanding why it’s important to debunk the petty stuff).

Comment #2: Gracchus.  on  04/28  at  10:53 AM

Trump is an ass, but I have a hard time deciding whether his douchyness stems from being a serious racist or simply the Lord of Trolls. Of course, this could be one of those both/and situations.

Comment #3: Entomologista  on  04/28  at  11:12 AM

I agree 100% with Amanda on this. Without the culture war and its divide-and-conquer effect on the have-nots, the plutocrats would never have been able to fuck this country over as thoroughly as they have done over the last few decades. And Gracchus too is quite correct to imply that if and when they sense the moment is right, our overlords will try their damndest to use the Real Americans as the shock troops for a fascist takeover. The insanity and hatefulness of the crazy 25% is a standing threat to what little is left of democracy in the US.

Comment #4: Steve LaBonne  on  04/28  at  11:18 AM

Of course you’re right, ignoring “birtherism” is not the right way to deal with it. It has to be confronted. The problem is very simple: liberals aren’t that good with confrontation.

Comment #5: atheist  on  04/28  at  11:20 AM

It’s amusing how much the John Birchers have become like the Communists they despise: the same mindless adherence to ideology, the same paranoid obsessions with loyalty, purity and internal enemies.  Even the same excuses—Bush failed because he wasn’t a Real Conservative, just like like Stalin didn’t represent True Communism.

The culture wars really got started with the battle over civil rights.  That’s how domestic terrorism was born.  That’s how Bible-thumping as a cover for reactionary politics was developed.  That’s how Jerry Falwell got his start, as a segregationist.

So did Pat Robertson, a fact which should be hung around his neck whenever he shows his face in public.  The evangelical culture warriors didn’t replace the segregationists—they’re the same damn people.  Their legacy may be watered down in some quarters of the conservative movement but it’s still alive & well.

Comment #6: Sour Kraut  on  04/28  at  11:27 AM

The correct strategy is force them to escalate their crazy so squishy independents and the beltway media won’t be able to hide from who these people really are. Both Trump and Taitz have moved from subtle dogwhistles to one step away from using the n-word on live tv since yesterday, so it seems to be working

Comment #7: Ben D.  on  04/28  at  11:34 AM

The correct strategy is force them to escalate their crazy so squishy independents and the beltway media won’t be able to hide from who these people really are. Both Trump and Taitz have moved from subtle dogwhistles to one step away from using the n-word on live tv since yesterday, so it seems to be working

Comment #8: Ben D.  on  04/28  at  11:34 AM

@Comment #8: Ben D.  on 04/28 at 11:34 AM

The correct strategy is force them to escalate their crazy so squishy independents and the beltway media won’t be able to hide from who these people really are. Both Trump and Taitz have moved from subtle dogwhistles to one step away from using the n-word on live tv since yesterday, so it seems to be working

WORD

In this instance, Obama has actually led the way. Now we need to follow suit and start pointing out repeatedly how fucking insane the Birthers really are.

Comment #9: atheist  on  04/28  at  11:38 AM

I too am with Ben @8, though I may be more cynical about the depths of both the Moronic Middle’s and the Village’s capacities to ignore reality.

Comment #10: Steve LaBonne  on  04/28  at  11:42 AM

The problem with escalation is it’s legitimately hurtful to the victims of this racist trolling. I don’t see confrontation as an escalation thing. I see more like sunlight as a disinfectant.

Comment #11: Amanda Marcotte  on  04/28  at  11:48 AM

Agree with the original post. Culture warriors rely on drive-by innuendo. In the long run, they don’t care if a particular issue is resolved to their satisfaction. Their purpose is to keep alive the notion that minorities should automatically be suspect. And by ignoring them we’re basically helping them with that. When they make such implications, the proper response is to push back and say, “No, that’s racist. Shut up.” Otherwise this concept that Obama’s birth certificate is somehow less trustworthy than that of the 43 presidents who came before him is still hanging in the air.

Comment #12: Triplanetary  on  04/28  at  10:41 PM

@6: Wait, what? That analogy makes no sense at all. Anti-Stalinist Marxists critiques are all from those who opposed Stalinism from the off- Trotskyists, Luxemburgists, council communists, etc.- not from strategically disillusioned ex-Stalinists. Those who still adhered to that sort of hyper-authoritarian communism- which, in the West, is about three old guys in Germany- think, as they always did, that Stalin was the dog’s bollocks.

Have the Tea Party really set the bar so low that we’re not even expected to have the slightest clue what we’re talking about before issuing opinions on it? :S

Comment #13: Finnegan  on  04/29  at  12:11 AM

Finnegan, I guess you’ve never met any young socialists who insist that Stalin’s brutality isn’t a knock on communism because he wasn’t a *true* communist like Trotsky.

Besides, perfectly accurate analogies were not the primary Soviet concern.  wink

Comment #14: Sour Kraut  on  04/29  at  02:17 AM

i’m with you up to a point, ms. marcotte. that point would be the express inability (according to you) of democratic congresspersons to hold their own, against the barbarian, er, right-wing republican hordes, absent the help of others. are our elected democrats so spineless, so ignorant, so inept, so clueless, that they lack the ability to do (or, realistically, their staffs) their very own research, on issues important to their constituents? this is the essence of what you’re saying here: if someone else doesn’t provide them the truth, they’ll just fold like a player at the cheap table, with a pair of deuces in five card stud.

if that’s the caliber of democrat we’re electing to public office, maybe we’d be better off without them.

Comment #15: cpinva  on  04/29  at  05:24 AM

that point would be the express inability (according to you) of democratic congresspersons to hold their own, against the barbarian, er, right-wing republican hordes, absent the help of others.

They’ve displayed this inability many, many times. Even when the Democrats held a majority in Congress under a Democratic president, they still pissed their pants every time the Republicans glared at them. They were always compromising and appeasing. The GOP throws a tantrum every time the Democrats aren’t compromising and appeasing them, but when they’re in control they’re brashly declaring that they don’t need to compromise with or appease anybody.

And the Democrats don’t stand up to that bullshit. So yeah, they’re useless.

Comment #16: Triplanetary  on  04/29  at  06:31 AM

The Democrats are NOT wimps or useless. They show great determination in voting for the interests of our corporate overlords despite their constituents’ clear desire for change. Ineptness is simply the most plausible means to disguise their determination.

Comment #17: felagund  on  04/29  at  07:06 AM

@14: Well, yeah (give or take the actual content of their criticism, which is generally a bit more complex than that), but that’s why the analogy doesn’t work: Trots, for all their faults, are not just Stalinists-but-more-so, which is what you suggested of the John Birchers in relationship to Bush.

Comment #18: Finnegan  on  04/29  at  10:46 AM

One of my fears is that the mainstream media could turn this into one of those “liberals can’t bring up birthers anymore because the releasing the long form ended birtherism” type naratives.  We can probably count on this like clockwork.

Comment #19: Albert Cirrus  on  04/29  at  11:15 AM

triplanetary, that was pretty much my point, and why i was less than whelmed by obama to begin with. when i vote for someone, i expect them to act like a class “A” prick, towards the other guy/gal, not collapse on a fainting couch.

suffice it to say, with rare exception (give me a moment…......), i’ve been pretty damn disappointed these past 30 years.

Comment #20: cpinva  on  04/29  at  12:37 PM

There is a variety of birther arguments, and most of them will continue unabated.  The ones that claim that Obama was not born in the USA will just deny the authenticity of the certificate.  Then there’s the other ones that will helpfully explain to you how, for example, Obama is not qualified to be President despite being born in the USA because he is (or was) a “dual citizen,” and, you know, the Constitution says dual citizens can’t be President.  Hell, I bet that if you repeat this argument enough times, Obama loses his American citizenship.

Comment #21: sacundim  on  04/29  at  06:27 PM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.