Login

Register

Member List

RSS Feed

Amanda | Contact

Auguste | Contact

Jesse | Contact

Pam | Contact

Next entry: We need more trains, not fancier cars Previous entry: What to remember when Republicans whine about “punishing success”

Your Republican Guide To Taxation

Taxes are confusing. No, not because of our insanely complex tax code, or because of the various forms we have to fill out every April. No, taxes are confusing because we've spent the past thirty-two years hearing from the modern Republican Party that taxes are too high on high earners and too low on low earners and that corporate tax rates are simultaneously too high and there are too many handouts for industries. You may think you're taxed one way, but the GOP is here to tell you that you can't trust your paycheck or your tax return or anyone else's tax return, because there's an economist at the Heritage Foundation who woke up in an opium den and figured out how you're being double taxed.

With this in mind, I'd like to share with you the Republican Guide to Taxation, a handy guide to figuring out how the GOP thinks about taxes. Don't blame me, I'm just the messenger.

Topic 1: How Much Do People Pay In Taxes?

Well, it depends how you look at it. From an income perspective, most people pay very little to nothing. All of those people who work pay Social Security and Medicare taxes, but those don't count because they're benefits that people in lower income brackets may one day receive. People who earn a lot of money, however, pay a criminal amount of taxes. 

From a consumption perspective, you pay around, say, 30 to 35% in "embedded taxes". This calculation comes from a top secret formula that can best be summarized as follows:

What's a good, round number that people will buy? + What's higher than the consumption tax we want to put in place? = Embedded tax rate.

Simple enough.

Frequently Asked Questions

But...wait. If you're poor, virtually all of your income goes toward consumption. So doesn't that mean that poor people actually pay a 30 to 35% tax rate?

Technically, yes.

Then poor people would seem to have a really high tax rate according to this math.

That's until you realize that the poor pay for all of their food with food stamps. Food stamps come from tax dollars. Basically, hard working job creators pay taxes to produce food that poor people buy with the very tax dollars job creators paid in the first place. 

Then...hold on, what?

Don't worry about it. All you need to know is that thanks to Obama's oppressive tax system, the minority of Americans pay for the majority.

Isn't our tax system basically Bush's tax system with a payroll tax cut added in?

Barack Obama has been president of taxes since 2001.

Topic 2: Double Taxation

As you may know, Mitt Romney has a tax burden under 15%. You know this because you're dumb and you believe the liberal media spin that comes from using arithmetic on numbers to arrive on figures. Taxes are not calculated using math. Taxes, at least for the richest Americans, are calculated using inferential accumulation.

Here's how it works. A corporation is a distinct legal entity designed to acheive certain business goals and absorb certain legal liabilities from its owners and operators. Corporations pay a corporate income tax in America that is the highest in the developed world, except for corporations who have accountants, in which case it's usually really low.

Corporations earn money, and pay taxes on their profits. Individuals are allowed to invest in companies by purchasing stock in them. Stock is a capital asset. If the individual holds on to that asset for more than a year and then sells it or receives a dividend from it, their profit is considered a long-term capital gain. Capital gains are taxed, and long-term capital gains are taxed at lower rates than regular income.

The original rationale for this was that long-term capital gains, if taxed as income, would almost always be taxed at the highest marginal income tax rate because people who get long-term capital gains tend to be really rich. Really rich people would be less likely to invest if they had to pay regular taxes on the money they earned for putting their money at risk to get more money back by letting other people do things with it. This is in stark contrast to rich people who put their money at risk by owning and operating businesses that do actual things and produce goods and services, who pay higher tax rates because they're chumps.

So, the corporation pays corporate taxes, and then when it pays out dividends to stockholders, the stockholders pay taxes on the money they receive. This happens because the government taxes realization events - when a person actually receives money they didn't have before. The corporation pays 35%, at least technically, and then the stockholder pays 15%. Most people, when confronted with this, would think that the stockholder pays 15%. This is because most people are subliterate, thanks to government schools. 

In reality, the stockholder pays 50%, because corporations aren't people and only people pay taxes. The stockholder is thus double taxed, because the legally distinct entity that paid taxes on its profits and wasn't necessarily obligated to pay the stockholder anything when it earned those profits could have paid the tax money out to stockholders and didn't, because, again, the food stamps.

Frequently Asked Questions

Didn't Mitt Romney say that corporations are people?

Corporations are only people in terms of buying political ads. At all other times, they are simply legal fictions necessary because the government won't absolve participants in capitalism of legal responsibility for killing people.

If double taxation exists, then what's Mitt Romney's actual tax burden?

Romney pays 35% in corporate taxes, plus 15% in capital gains taxes. He donates about 13% to charity, which also counts as taxes because...well, I don't have an explanation for that one. He pays about 10% in state and local taxes, let's say. He pays the 30 to 35% embedded tax on everything he consumes. He will be leaving an estate worth hundreds of millions to his family, so let's put in the 35% estate tax rate that he'll pay even though he'll be dead and his children will be the people actually writing the check for the property they inherited.

All told, Mitt Romney's tax rate is 143%. No wonder he does his own laundry

Okay, folks. That's it for our first installment!

------

Registration is now required! We're still in the process of getting it all squared away, so for the moment don't forget to Login or Register using the links in the upper left menu before starting to write your comment.

Posted by Jesse Taylor on 06:37 PM • (15) Comments

On a somewhat tangential note, Mitt Romney profits off illegal foreclosures in Florida. God forbid he gets taxed on those profits! http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2012/01/25/409804/romneys-profited-foreclosure-florida/

Comment #1: curiouscliche  on  01/25  at  07:44 PM

president of taxes

And thousands of secessionist Texans just got really excited for a minute before going back and reading that phrase again.

Also tangentially related: assuming Romney and family were using that laundry-doing moment as a photo op in an attempt to demonstrate what a totally real real-world real-ass real guy Mitt Romney is, which seems likely, they flubbed it pretty badly. The caption is particularly telling: “Nothing like the glamorous life on the road”? Romney can’t even fake being normal, because he thinks that doing his own laundry counts as roughing it. For most of us, what he’s doing in that picture is called everyday reality, not an occasional hardship that comes with being on the road.

Comment #2: Triplanetary  on  01/25  at  07:44 PM

As my imaginary southern aunt would say, “Jesse, you are a treasure.”

Comment #3: Sarah TX  on  01/25  at  08:05 PM

“All told, Mitt Romney’s tax rate is 143%”

...well hell, we should be paying Willard just for being willing to remain an American citizen, and being willing to live here with the rest of us moochers and leeches.

I’d sure hate to see him leave and live in some other country with lower taxes…and take all those wonderful jobs he’s created with him…

Comment #4: MikeEss  on  01/25  at  08:21 PM

I always thought the double taxation part took care of itself: After all, if the shareholder has to pay tax on the dividend, that’s balanced out by when they have to contribute the negative dividend to the corporation if it doesn’t make a profit, so they can apply that against their taxes. Right?

Comment #5: fuyura  on  01/25  at  08:46 PM

You gave yourself away when you called it the estate tax instead of the death tax.  The liberalfascist doctrine is so insidious!

Comment #6: ganews_  on  01/25  at  10:57 PM

Double taxation?  You mean like how wage-earners pay income taxes on top of payroll taxes, and then pay sales taxes on top of that when they want to buy luxuries like clothing?

Comment #7: BABH  on  01/26  at  01:00 AM

And when wingnuts whine about how “half of American households pay no taxes” point them to Keith Hennessey, GWB economic adviser, for the answer to that: http://keithhennessey.com/2010/04/15/off-the-rolls/ Child tax credit and Earned Income Tax Credit, both of which were supported by conservatives, are the two main drivers in the growth of the number of households paying no federal income tax. As Hennessey says, rolling back either is “highly unlikely”.

Comment #8: DonnaDiva  on  01/26  at  02:18 AM

This actually kind of drives me nuts as a mathematics issue.  15% + 35% = 50% of the original 100%.  35% on 100 = 65, 15% on 65 = 9.75, thus the accumulated rate is 44.75.  Of course this is on the premise that some how Mitt Romney is the singular owner of Bain Capital and is thus entitled to all profits and assets of the business.  I find the double dip argument incredibly funny if only for that fact that regular wage earners aren’t counted against corporate taxes because it is a negative on the company’s books while a capital gain is well…a capital gain, it’s a positive on the books of the company that is a reward for success.  The problem with taxes is that they’re a nuanced concept and soar over the heads of most people.  It’s sort of how the gold standard and Ron Paul’s talking points work on those stupid enough to not understand.

Comment #9: Xeranar  on  01/26  at  03:37 AM

@ #2:  Besides which, who does their laundry on vacation anyway?  When I was on a tightly scheduled two-week trip to South Africa, I used the handy hotel tag to have my laundry done while I was going to all my meetings and seminars and working lunches.  I mean, really.

Comment #10: speedbudget  on  01/26  at  09:26 AM

Xeraner - yeah, I caught that, too, and it does happen all the damn time, and yeah, drive me nuts too.  I hate really bad basic math.  It’s not so bad when it’s something really complicated, but percents of remainders?  God.
Speedbudget - I travel a lot for work.  Less more recently.  I have to justify my expenses to a middle manager.  If I’m on the road for more than 2 weeks and it isn’t a meeting type trip (where I would need dry cleaning or pressing) but a construction or construction inspection type (where I am wearing work gear, often of heavy cloth), I will often try to stay somewhere that has guest laundry facilities.  Many of my co-workers try to find services outside the hotels that do laundry by volume or weight.  For non-executives, this is more the reality for those who travel for work in the construction and contracting fields.  None of this would apply to Romney, but that is who he would likely be trying to appeal to.

Comment #11: helen w. h.  on  01/26  at  09:43 AM

Romney pays 35% in corporate taxes, plus 15% in capital gains taxes.  He donates about 13% to charity, which also counts as taxes because…well, I don’t have an explanation for that one.  He pays about 10% in state and local taxes, let’s say.  He pays the 30 to 35% embedded tax on everything he consumes.  He will be leaving an estate worth hundreds of millions to his family, so let’s put in the 35% estate tax rate that he’ll pay even though he’ll be dead and his children will be the people actually writing the check for the property they inherited.

All told, Mitt Romney’s tax rate is 143%.

Not for nothing but I think you just wrote the wingnuts an issue ad for this campaign season.  There’s no shortage of American voters dumb enough to believe exactly this.

Comment #12: GSDavis  on  01/26  at  12:33 PM

I did once have a girlfriend whose mother was in the exceptional situation of paying more in taxes than she made in income. (Not to the tune of 143% or anything, I don’t think.) As far as I could discern this was a result of shitty accounting and the fact that she kept an LLC around without it actually doing any business.

But the thing is, she didn’t have such an enormous (relative) tax burden because she was rich. Quite the opposite. She was fuckin’ broke.

A rich person doesn’t even need to try to avoid high taxes - Warren Buffet once stated that he doesn’t try to exploit any loopholes, he simply pays exactly what the Internal Revenue Code requires, and he still ends up paying a lower percentage of his income than any of his non-billionaire employees.

Of course, even that’s not enough for many rich people, who use fancy accountin’ and offshore accounts to avoid the vast majority of their taxes.

Comment #13: Triplanetary  on  01/26  at  01:10 PM

“This is a thing that was in his head, and he didn’t immediately go, “Well, wasn’t that a strange thought,” and reject it.”

If he was any sort of normal person then he would have rejected it and immediately forgotten about even thinking it.  As a politician (especially in the Reichwing) his thought sequence probably went something like this:

1. I wonder if anybody’s ever eaten a fetus.
2. What do they taste like?
3. I bet the rubes would get upset if they thought there was fetus in their food.
4. But I have no evidence there is fetus in anybody’s food…
5. Evidence?  Since when do I need evidence for something I want to believe?
6. I bet I can turn this into an issue that will help get me re-elected, and if I’m lucky, some Democrat will come out on the short end for arguing about it.
7.  A law!  There has got to be a law to prevent this horrible possibility from ever happening!
8. The rubes are gonna love me!

9. I will now erase from my memory all of this cynical political calculation so I can work myself into an outrage over what “Science” and Liberals and FemiNazis and Coastal Elites are doing to this great country.  God-damned liberals, I hate ‘em!…

Comment #14: MikeEss  on  01/26  at  08:50 PM

Corporations earn money, and pay taxes on their profits. Individuals are allowed to invest in companies by purchasing stock in them.

Incorrect. Corporations pay taxes on their top-line revenue. We learned that from Joe The Plumber a few years back.

Comment #15: catfood  on  01/27  at  07:28 AM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.